Instruction core: trim the always-loaded text of both clients; trading rules load only where they apply by seathatflowsinourveins · Pull Request #836 · seathatflowsinourveins/native-agent-stack

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-07T19:22:24Z

Scope

What this PR changes, in one or two sentences: trims the text every session loads at startup to a core (root AGENTS.md from 10,959 to 7,499 bytes; Claude's startup scope from 23,896 to 19,885 bytes and Codex's from 20,101 to 15,983), keeping every remaining rule sentence's wording, and moves the trading trigger out of the root file into a path-scoped rule that loads only for trading paths (.claude/rules/trading.md) and the existing subtree pointer.
Base commit: 475127d43c1cce70dba5cd31238af4e078fa17eb
Lane: lane:shared (root AGENTS.md is a shared hot file in docs/lanes.md; the trading lane's acknowledgement is asked before merge)
Owned paths touched: root AGENTS.md; examples/claude-native/CLAUDE.md; adoption/templates/codex.AGENTS.template.md; new .claude/rules/trading.md; the two regenerated carriers adoption/new-wsl/{claude,codex}-user-instructions.md; adoption/scaffold/AGENTS.md; examples/claude-native/workflows/README.md; tests/fixtures/harness-context-moves/ (12.txt, 13.txt, contracts.json, README.md); tests/test_install_claude_profile.py; tests/test_codex_worker_lane.py; new docs/decisions/2026-10-07-instruction-core.md and dated addenda in three earlier records; manifests/evidence.json (registry, last). Root CLAUDE.md is byte-identical; nothing under catalogs/ or blueprints/ changes.

SOTA sources

Claude Code documentation, Memory, https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory (read 2026-10-07): keep each CLAUDE.md under about 200 lines; longer files cost context and reduce adherence; path-scoped rules in .claude/rules/ with paths: load only when Claude works with matching files; nested files load on demand.
Claude Code documentation, Best practices, https://code.claude.com/docs/en/best-practices (read 2026-10-07): for each line, ask whether removing it would cause a mistake; if not, cut it.
OpenAI Codex documentation, AGENTS.md discovery, https://developers.openai.com/codex/guides/agents-md (read 2026-10-07): one file per directory from the root to the working directory, concatenated, under a byte cap; a subtree file carries that subtree's rules.
Anthropic, Effective context engineering for AI agents, https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents (published 2025-09-29): the smallest set of high-signal tokens.

Evidence-class table

Claim	Evidence class	Command / receipt
Startup scopes 23,896 to 19,885 bytes (Claude) and 20,101 to 15,983 (Codex), re-measured at the landing head with `startup_files()`	local_integration	`tests.test_install_claude_profile.PortableTopRuleTests` measurement at this head
The two carriers equal their filtered sources	local_integration	`tools/adoption/new_wsl_client_config.py --write-blocks`; `tests.test_new_wsl_client_config`
No user-level file on this host changes in this PR	source_review	the diff: only repository files; the host's own files change only in a later tools window

Local commands run

$ python -m unittest tests.test_install_claude_profile tests.test_codex_worker_lane tests.test_new_wsl_client_config tests.test_scaffold_repo tests.test_adoption_docs_consistency
513 ran, 0 failed, 14 skipped (12 need NAS_CODEX_INTEGRATION, 1 needs CONTEXT_MODE_SECURITY_JS, 1 is data-dependent); exit 0
$ (25 further modules that name a changed path)  1,602 ran, 0 failed, 13 skipped; exit 0
$ node --test (the two workflow JS suites) and the envelope and mutation scripts: 254/254 and 74/74 passed
$ python3 scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check   exit 0 (10,533 files)
$ python3 scripts/validate.py   exit 0
$ whole suite in CI form   11,557 ran, 12 failed, 1,080 skipped; the same 12 ids fail at the base commit in the same environment (host baseline)

Decision record

docs/decisions/2026-10-07-instruction-core.md: the change, what each moved block's new home is, the alternatives (a new harness kit repository, which the owner approved separately for later; leaving the files as they are), and what would overturn it.

Contract changes

contract-changes= tests.test_install_claude_profile.StandingRuleSurfacesTests.test_the_three_surfaces_carry_the_same_standing_sentences (kind 4: the surface list loses root AGENTS.md; kind 3: the first standing sentence loses its vendor example) · tests.test_install_claude_profile.PortableTopRuleTests.test_each_relocated_passage_is_byte_bound_to_its_destination_section (kind 4: relocation contract 01 retired with its heading; 01.txt kept as history; two new contracts 12 and 13 added) · tests.test_codex_worker_lane.TemplateTests.test_top_rule_is_pinned_and_rendered_rtk_is_the_unchanged_pinned_source (kind 3: both pins recomputed) · tests.test_install_claude_profile.PortableTopRuleTests.STARTUP_BUDGET_BYTES (tightened: 24,458 and 20,103 to 20,880 and 16,783). Each is named in the decision record with what it supersedes; the command center rules the kind 4 rows by name.

Host evidence

Not applicable: nothing under evidence/hosts/ changes.

Checklist

New/changed GitHub Actions are pinned to a full commit SHA with a version comment: not applicable, no workflow or action changes.
New/changed workflows declare top-level permissions: {}: not applicable, no workflow changes.
No secrets are printed, logged or committed; no new required secret.
No new paid hosting, subscription or billing surface.
Peer-owned untracked files and worktrees were preserved.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…e displaced rules to their triggers The owner asked on 2026-10-07 for the always-loaded instruction files to be cut back to a curated core that keeps the research-first, upstream-as-source-of-truth philosophy, with displaced rules such as the trading rules moved to where they apply. The command center ruled the changed expectations the same day. Decision record: docs/decisions/2026-10-07-instruction-core.md. Sources - AGENTS.md: a shorter top rule, a "Where things are" pointer index and the repository's own rules (10,959 -> 7,294 bytes, 57 -> 34 lines). The standing sentences that both user-level blocks carry leave the root file, and its copy of the Codex routing paragraph becomes a pointer. - examples/claude-native/CLAUDE.md: four on-demand items leave, three pointers to one README anchor become one, and the Codex block's token-lane sentence is added as one bullet (11,905 -> 11,145 bytes, 59 -> 55 lines). - adoption/templates/codex.AGENTS.template.md: the web-research and queue-timing lines leave and the courier recipe moves to the workflow README behind one pointer (8,076 -> 7,418 bytes compact, 9,142 -> 8,484 rendered). - .claude/rules/trading.md (new): the root trading trigger, word for word, scoped by paths: to the trading lane's paths. - The Alpaca example leaves the first standing sentence on every surface. - Root CLAUDE.md is unchanged. Derived - Both carriers regenerated with tools/adoption/new_wsl_client_config.py --write-blocks (0 units left out; 55 of 55 and 72 of 72 lines stay). - adoption/scaffold/AGENTS.md takes the template's "Prefer..." line. Destination and contracts - The workflow README's mechanics section gains the courier recipe (12.txt, 485 bytes) and the upstream-practice citation sentence (13.txt, 319 bytes). - Contract 01 leaves contracts.json; 01.txt stays as its October 5 snapshot. Changed test expectations (five, each named in the decision record) - StandingRuleSurfacesTests: SURFACES loses root AGENTS.md (relaxed); the first standing sentence loses its example (changed). - PortableTopRuleTests relocation contracts: contract 01 removed (relaxed). - TemplateTests: TOP_RULE_SHA256 and PRE_RTK_SHA256 recomputed (changed). - STARTUP_BUDGET_BYTES: 24,458/20,103 -> 20,445/16,567 (tightened). The scopes, measured with the test's own startup_files, fall from 23,896 to 19,471 bytes (Claude) and from 20,101 to 15,778 (Codex); each ceiling is the measured scope plus 5%, rounded upward. Records: the new decision record with its SOTA sources, dated addenda in the 2026-10-05 budget decision and the 2026-09-30 rule-text record, and the regenerated instruction inventory at the tail of the 2026-10-02 record. No host file changes. manifests/evidence.json follows in the next commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…e.json Hot-file protocol of docs/lanes.md: the base commit's manifest, then scripts/host_receipts.register_file for each changed file the manifest already lists (12), and for four new files: .claude/rules/trading.md, docs/decisions/2026-10-07-instruction-core.md and the passage fixtures 12.txt and 13.txt, following the registration of the instruction surfaces, of the 2026-10-06 record and of its dated fixtures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ng lane's change request) Paper and broker operation, data acquisition and trading research mostly run outside the repository's paths, so a path-scoped rule does not load in the sessions that operate paper. The root file's Subtree rules line now says, for every session, that each coordinator unit names the north-star action it serves and that trading work of any kind reads blueprints/us-equities/AGENTS.md first, wherever it runs. The path-scoped rule stays for sessions working in the trading paths. Registry re-registered last. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…aded trading prerequisite Closes the test half of finding 1 of the cross-family read at 311e614: StandingRuleSurfacesTests gains a check that root AGENTS.md keeps the maintainer sentence, the clause that each coordinator unit names the north-star action it serves, and the sentence that trading work of any kind reads blueprints/us-equities/AGENTS.md first wherever it runs, and carries none of the dropped clauses. Registry re-registered last. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-07T23:54:00Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-08T00:07:57.368330Z	`bcc9f67`	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bcc9f6778c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

…e (review thread P2) The ceilings were measured scope + 5% from a first draft (19,471 and 15,778 bytes). The landing head measures 19,885 (Claude: block 11,411 + AGENTS.md 7,499 + CLAUDE.md 975) and 15,983 (Codex: block 8,484 + AGENTS.md 7,499) with the test's own PortableTopRuleTests.startup_files(), after the restored trading sentence and #833's CLAUDE.md pointer line. The ceilings become 20,880 and 16,783 (+5%, rounded up), and the decision record's table, totals and contract row 5 follow, with a note on why the figures moved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-08T01:28:02Z

Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: landing at head 5022617178714f97d45991e7ad67d500fc0bfd08. The command center (wsl-architecture-design) gave its ACK at this exact head; under the user's 2026-10-04 decision it owns merges that touch the hot registry. The read-only cross-family review (GPT-6.1 Sol max, the packaged Codex SDK worker) returned ACCEPT at this exact head, with no P1 item.

Observed main 36654a8174b5cad1380bd13ed1fffc0f135aac2c. coordination/merge_tree_landing_check.py (sha256 a11649fcf2e5844c…) exit 0:

main 36654a8174b5cad1380bd13ed1fffc0f135aac2c head 5022617178714f97d45991e7ad67d500fc0bfd08 base 36654a8174b5cad1380bd13ed1fffc0f135aac2c merged-tree 2c0ca892fe80f721b667d93b1df8557d49e0cd6f merge-tree-exit 0
ok   1: clean three-way merge
ok   2: merged-vs-main paths 19, outside PR-owned 0 []
ok   3: main drift 0 paths, overlap with PR-owned inputs (registry excluded) []
ok   4: registry foreign rows equal True, order preserved True, PR-owned rows 16, unowned top-level keys differing []
ok   5: merged files[] sorted by path with no duplicates: True (10560 rows)
LANDABLE
condition 5: merged files[] sorted and unique (tree 2c0ca892fe80f721b667d93b1df8557d49e0cd6f)

Required checks at this head: 7 pass . Unresolved review threads: 0.

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-08T01:28:08Z

Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: post-merge observation. Landed as ffd4b8508ae2494bf5bf7ed9df1932537dbb7ecf (parent 36654a8174b5cad1380bd13ed1fffc0f135aac2c), tree 2c0ca892fe80f721b667d93b1df8557d49e0cd6f. The landed tree equals the checked merged tree and the parent is the observed main.

…heck (#838) ### Scope The required Linux test job runs serially and blocks each landing for roughly half an hour. This change runs native unittest discovery as eight module shards and keeps one final required check named `validate`, which fails on any unsuccessful dependency or incomplete module coverage. - Base commit: `b16cb8cf7cb8e37bf0d0edb9924502beb3e6a276`. - Lane: `lane:shared`; the command center requests trading acknowledgement for the one promotion workflow-contract method. - Owned paths: validate workflow, shard helper/weights, its fixtures, declared workflow-contract tests, the decision/receipt and the final registry commit. - Landing path: exact-head co-op cross-family read after the draft's hosted timing run; command-center ACK; 5f lands after #833/#836 and before #820/#829/#776, per GO-RELAUNCH230713Z and RULING203309Z. The draft stays draft until that read. Critical-path cap allowance confirmed by item191739Z; all25kind3rows accepted by name in203309Z subject to their stronger-assertion condition. - #706 relation: this final summary supersedes G-6 (serial suite counts); G-1 (PR-metadata workflow work) stays in #706 for its rank38 turn. ## SOTA sources - [GitHub matrix strategies and failure handling](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-what-workflows-do/run-job-variations), read 2026-10-07. - [GitHub needs result](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/contexts#needs-context) and [always](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/expressions#always), read 2026-10-07. - [Skipped jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-when-workflows-run/control-jobs-with-conditions) report success even when required; [required status checks](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches#require-status-checks-before-merging) accept skipped statuses. This final job always runs and explicitly rejects skipped/cancelled/failed dependencies. - [CPython v3.12.3 native discovery](https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/v3.12.3/Lib/unittest/loader.py#L109), [load_tests protocol](https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/unittest.html#load-tests-protocol) and [TextTestRunner](https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/unittest.html#unittest.TextTestRunner). The helper supplies assignment and receipt glue; unittest runs the tests. - `native-agent-stack@b16cb8c:.github/workflows/validate.yml:147-250`: the unchanged provisioners and diagnostics. - Same pin, `docs/decisions/2026-10-03-suite-parallelism-trial-outcome.md:24-27`: the superseded Linux serial instruction; failed pool-trial evidence and macOS instruction preserved. - Existing pinned download/upload artifact actions are reused; no requirement file or other workflow job changes. ### Evidence-class table | Claim | Evidence class | Command / receipt | | --- | --- | --- | | Historical timing weights | source_review of retained native output | run37653671981/job112905135751, log SHA b1d2d43e; 17 failures retained | | Native discovery and assignment | local_integration | Current tree discovery-only sample:272owners/11607cases, no bodies; predates final fixture set | | Focused contracts and fixtures | local_integration; synthetic fixtures remain synthetic | 368tests/95.067s with one retained serial-binding failure; its authorized class delta3tests/0.874s passes; final new-module13tests/3.383s passes | | Syntax/integrity | local_integration | actionlint0; offlinezizmor0/findings[]; py_compile0; diff--check0; validate.py0 | | Hosted timing and exact module/count union | pending | The draft's actual run supplies this; historical estimates are not acceptance | Expected first-run limitation: this branch is still based on b16cb8c, while main28327acc carries #837's new frozen-lock exceptions. The first osv-scanner check is expected red for that base; it is refreshed only at the command-center landing cue's single rebase. No exception or requirement change is added here, and a local check never substitutes for the landing head's hosted result. ### Local commands run ```text nice -n 19 ionice -c3 actionlint -color .github/workflows/validate.yml exit0 nice -n 19 ionice -c3 zizmor --offline --no-config --no-ignores --format json .github/workflows/validate.yml exit0, [] python3 -I -B -X pycache_prefix=<ignored-owned-path> -m py_compile <helper and five touched test modules> exit0 nice -n 19 ionice -c3 <activated Python3.12.3> -I -B -X faulthandler <stdlib unittest bootstrap> -q --durations 50 selected: test_validate_shards, test_workflow_hardening, test_shell_parser_ci, test_landscape_sweep_skills, test_workflow_security_coverage, test_promotion_gate, test_adoption_docs_consistency exit1, 368ran/95.067s/onefailure/fiveskips (retained) Only failure: the promotion class's serial-command binding. Authorized delta: that class exit0, 3ran/0.874s; other36method ASTs and surrounding bytes preserved. New fixture deltas:12ran/3.407s and13ran/3.383s, both exit0. No full-suite phase or hidden baseline waiver. nice -n 19 ionice -c3 <activated Python3.12.3> -I -B scripts/validate.py exit0, components69/hashed_files10559/profiles4/receipts226. git diff --check exit0 ``` The local environment has Python3.12.3/PyYAML6.0.3 and real Node24.21.0/npm11.19.0 bins before generic PATH. It is a focused environment, not full hosted-image parity. Every hosted cell keeps the current installer and promotion/parser/NodeYAML provisioners; non-test checks execute once in cell zero. ### Contract changes Each listed existing test deliberately replaces the serial whole-suite binding with complete module-shard coverage under `docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md` (kind3). Provisioning, history, timeout/faulthandler and native failure controls remain. The one promotion method additionally runs the tiny native aggregate fixture; neighboring and numeric assertions remain byte-identical. The trading lane's conditional acknowledgement, ledger row `report-native-agent-stack-5f-20261007T200005-shardack`, binds that promotion method to three conditions: 1. Every shard runs the promotion provisioner with `--require-hashes` on `blueprints/us-equities/data/requirements.lock` and exports `REQUIRE_PROMOTION_GATE_VENV=1` before testing, including the shard assigned this module. 2. Module coverage comes from live native discovery, with each module's executed suite exactly once. Weights are scheduling estimates, not a separate test inventory. 3. Final `validate` runs under `if: always()` and passes only on successful shards; cancellation, skipping and timeout fail the gate. The trading lane checks these again on this PR before merge. | Test ID | Kind | Record | | --- | --- | --- | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.WholeSuiteJobsCheckOutFullHistory.test_whole_suite_jobs_set_fetch_depth_zero` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.WholeSuiteHeadroomAndDiagnostics.test_every_whole_suite_job_names_its_suite_step` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.WholeSuiteHeadroomAndDiagnostics.test_each_suite_lists_its_50_slowest_tests_with_faulthandler_on` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.WholeSuiteHeadroomAndDiagnostics.test_linux_suites_abort_five_minutes_before_the_job_limit` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.WholeSuiteHeadroomAndDiagnostics.test_validate_uploads_its_verbose_log_even_when_the_suite_fails` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.ValidateSuiteStepTracesAHang.test_a_hang_prints_the_hung_test_traceback_and_fails_the_step` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_workflow_hardening.ValidateSuiteStepTracesAHang.test_control_without_faulthandler_the_hang_leaves_no_traceback` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_provisioning_step_exists_in_the_validate_job` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_provisioning_step_precedes_the_unittest_step` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_step_command_is_derived_from_the_pin_file` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_step_exports_the_directory_through_github_env` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_step_cannot_be_skipped_or_ignored` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_the_provisioning_job_is_the_job_that_runs_the_suite` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningStepTests.test_every_whole_suite_job_provisions_the_parser_or_is_a_recorded_gap` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningControls.test_each_mutant_is_reported_in_its_category` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.ProvisioningControls.test_a_scratch_copy_of_the_workflow_without_the_step_fails_the_structure_tests` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.RealRatchetControls.test_the_real_workflows_pass` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.RealRatchetControls.test_a_new_whole_suite_job_in_a_real_workflow_is_reported` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.RealRatchetControls.test_provisioning_a_recorded_gap_job_is_cleared_by_deleting_its_entry` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_shell_parser_ci.RealRatchetControls.test_a_step_that_only_names_the_pin_file_is_judged_by_the_structure_checks` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_landscape_sweep_skills.SkillsYamlProvisioningTests.test_the_validate_job_provisions_the_yaml_pin_before_the_suite` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_landscape_sweep_skills.SkillsYamlProvisioningTests.test_every_whole_suite_job_provisions_the_yaml_pin_or_is_a_recorded_gap` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_landscape_sweep_skills.SkillsYamlProvisioningControls.test_each_mutant_is_reported_in_its_category` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_landscape_sweep_skills.SkillsYamlProvisioningControls.test_the_ratchet_reports_a_new_whole_suite_job_and_a_gap_that_now_provisions` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | | `tests.test_promotion_gate.WorkflowProvisioningContract.test_unittest_step_runs_the_full_suite` | 3 | docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md | ### Failed attempts and limits The failed unittest-parallel trial remains unchanged. The historical weighting run failed17 tests. Worker fixture-authoring attempts (one missing-helper error; then one failure/one error among12cases) remain disclosed separately; later root runs do not replace them. An early validate returned1 for pending registry hashes, and an incorrect register_file CLI probe returned2 before the documented Python API was used. The source critic's two fixture gaps (global zero discovery and a package hook invoking nested discovery) are covered by the passing native delta fixtures. Shared fixture origins trigger an explicit serial fallback; that preserves native semantics and must be reported as a performance constraint. Actual hosted latency, skips and complete module coverage remain pending. ### Decision record `docs/decisions/2026-10-07-validate-module-shards.md`; scoped observations in `evidence/artifacts/validate-module-shards-20261007/preparation.json`. The final commit changes only `manifests/evidence.json`. ### Host evidence No host receipt, platform-status change, install or setting change. ### Checklist - [x] Changed actions pinned to full SHAs with version comments. - [x] Top-level permissions empty; each job grants contents:read only. - [x] No credential value or new secret. - [x] No new billing surface. - [x] Peer worktrees preserved. - [ ] Trading acknowledgement before merge (command center requests it). - [ ] Hosted timing/coverage receipt and exact-head cross-family read.

seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:shared Touches files owned by both lanes; needs both lanes' acknowledgement label Oct 7, 2026

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2026

ci: shard validate with native unittest coverage and a strict final check #838

Merged

5 of 7 tasks

seathatflowsinourveins and others added 4 commits October 7, 2026 19:50

seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the cc/instruction-core-20261007 branch from 6650f41 to bcc9f67 Compare October 7, 2026 23:53

seathatflowsinourveins marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2026 23:53

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Oct 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tests/test_install_claude_profile.py Outdated

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2026

Haiku 5.5 takes cheap exact extraction: record the 2026-10-07 repeat trial (land after 2026-10-08T17:18Z) #840

Open

5 tasks done

seathatflowsinourveins merged commit ffd4b85 into main Oct 8, 2026
27 of 30 checks passed

seathatflowsinourveins deleted the cc/instruction-core-20261007 branch October 8, 2026 01:28

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Instruction core: trim the always-loaded text of both clients; trading rules load only where they apply - #836

Instruction core: trim the always-loaded text of both clients; trading rules load only where they apply#836
seathatflowsinourveins merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cc/instruction-core-20261007

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 8, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 8, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Scope

SOTA sources

Evidence-class table

Local commands run

Decision record

Contract changes

Host evidence

Checklist

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 8, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 8, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading