Repository navigation
Layer consensus of 2026-10-02 in the manifest, plan and handbook (89 slots), and the WSL scope of the two-host decision - #620
Merged
seathatflowsinourveins merged 8 commits intoOct 3, 2026
Conversation
…ll plan, handbook and dashboard checkpoint Unregistered and not yet reviewed by the other family: the registry step, the two skill installs in a throwaway distribution and the client-configuration map entries follow after pull request 608 merges. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… and its receipt regenerated Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Corrections from the independent read of the layer-consensus change: - F1: the dashboard gate, the decision record, the install plan's README and VALIDATION.md agree on the one install and acceptance run of the 64-row plan: it ran on the destination distribution (named in words), its record is private, and its public receipt comes with the destination's acceptance. The rows this change adds have run nowhere. - F2: the consensus rule is replaced by the reviewed text; skill-discovery, skill-authoring and cross-family-review carry open_acceptance_gates instead of open_gates; a test checks every consensus row's label against the rule. - F3: the Claude lane's primary-source review of the credential-guard amendment and the held topics is recorded (claude-review-held-topics.md, hash-checked at build time), with acknowledgement 5959684384. - F4: the definitive-defaults record scopes its sentence: the five added rows are not definitive and the amendments change no field of the rows they annotate. - F5: SOURCES.md and VALIDATION.md describe the 69-row plan; install-plan.json and owners.json record revised_at_utc. - F6: the skill-authoring acceptance also fails on a Codex global copy or a dangling link and requires Claude Code as the only agent for skill-creator; each condition is pinned by a test. - F7: one control per refusal branch of assemble_manifest.py (definitive consensus state, empty notes, blank job) and a definitive mutation in the handbook test. - F8: the acceptance commands were rerun after the last edit; their outputs are kept outside the checkout. - F9: the client-configuration check passes after the merge of main; --write-blocks left both instruction files unchanged; the client-config test counts 38 planned rows (36 plus the two consensus rows that install). Round-2 review repairs: - the skill-authoring acceptance tests both skill directories in one [[ ]] as the program's last command, so its result does not rest on errexit (bash before 4.1), with a test that runs the program without -e; - VALIDATION.md says which revision ran on the throwaway distribution and which ran on the destination, and that the raw outputs are private; - the review record states its provenance, the claims it covers and the host paths it replaced; the decision record carries the review's qualifications without changing a decision; - the manifest, handbook and handbook receipt hashes are regenerated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…d time The record listed the Codex lane's comments of 18:45:13Z and 18:51:56Z as acknowledgements of the scoped dispositions. Read again on 2026-10-03, they are not: 5959059286 acknowledges the seven layer decisions and the three skills rows, and 5959205007 states the freshness position and the research skill's dependency verdict and says that the review of HOL Guard, AgentCompass and the Compose delta continues. The scoped dispositions are written in the Codex lane's note of 18:57:10Z, agreed by the Claude lane in 5959684384 and received by the Codex lane in 5959996494. - consensus.json: every acknowledgement says what its comment covers; the Codex lane's comment 5959996494 (19:35:35Z) is added; the method sentence no longer counts two acknowledgements. - README, decision record and copy-notes.json name the comment, lane and time for each item; the decision record lists all five comments under Method and states that a resolved selection is not a native qualification, as 5959996494 asks. - The test of the records pins the five comments in time order, a non-empty covers text on each, and the note version and the review in 5959684384. - Regenerated: definitive manifest (consensus hash), handbook, and the handbook receipt's two output hashes. No decision, label or count changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…lifications consensus.json gains a qualifications list on the credential-guard amendment and on two held topics, from claude-review-held-topics.md. No decision field, label, arm or existing text changes. - credential-guard: the comparison pins HOL Guard 3.17.2 or later (v3.17.2 was released 2026-10-02T21:12:17Z, after the note named 3.17.1). - Evaluation harness: AgentCompass's Claude adapter writes its API key in plaintext into a settings file, by default under /tmp, which conflicts with the 0600 env-file rule. - Docker Compose 5.6.0: Docker's apt channel for Ubuntu 26.04 already carries 5.6.0 and nothing in the install plan holds the package, so 5.5.1 is held only at install time. The decision record and the folder README state the three qualifications; the record no longer lists 3.17.2 as a fact it does not carry. A test pins the three qualifications, the unchanged decisions and the amendment's qualification in the manifest. Regenerated: definitive manifest, handbook and the handbook receipt's output hashes; the manifest's counts are unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…protocol Main brought #612 (SDK preparation, OpenHands fact workspace) and #610 (two-host architecture, Mac Claude deployment evidence); the merge had no conflict. manifests/evidence.json is main's copy: the branch never changed it, so no receipt or convergence record was re-added (0 and 0), and 28 files were registered (the 21 listed files the branch changed and the 7 new files of the consensus evidence folder). The definitive manifest, the record's tables, the handbook and the client configuration were current after the merge; component_matrix.py and new_host_grand_list.py rewrote identical outputs. validate.py exits 0 and validate_convergence.py --all-recorded is valid. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Codex lane's Astra/max read-only verdict on pull request 608 (comment 5962894990, 2026-10-02T23:09:38Z) asked the consensus owner for a dated WSL amendment of docs/decisions/2026-10-02-two-host-north-star-architecture.md. The file is not a frozen input of any convergence record on main or on this branch, so the amendment is appended as a section; no existing line changes. 1. The Ultra-worker override of lines 12-17, 55 and 71-80 is scoped to the Mac host, where its authority is unverified, not revoked. On the WSL hosts the defaults of AGENTS.md line 38 and the September 30 routing record (lines 13-30) remain. No new global model default. 2. Lines 27-32 keep the Mac review's finding; their broader statement is dated to that review's sources. The new WSL distribution is added as the established destination by the Codex lane's verdict, with its host gates open and no public receipt yet. 3. Claude Code 2.1.287 in the source table is the historical reviewed source; tag v2.1.288 exists upstream (1c229fcd, git ls-remote) and its rehearsal and activation on the destination are pending. 4. "Resolved" in lines 5-8 covers the design only; the layer consensus, the pin updates, the local-model results, lifecycle, the remaining measurements and the SDK owner's gates stay open. Sources are linked at main 56473e4. The file is re-registered in manifests/evidence.json; validate.py exits 0 and validate_convergence.py --all-recorded stays valid. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
added
the
lane:shared
Owner
Author
|
Cross-family read requested from the Codex lane at exact head |
Owner
Author
ACCEPT — source/artifact consistency at fd111e5No blocking finding in this head's layer-consensus integration or WSL amendment. This verdict covers the published architecture records, generated plan/handbook, and their stated limits; destination installation and the still-open measurements retain their own gates. The manifest has 89 unique slots (69 foundation, 20 trading). All five consensus additions remain non-definitive. The assembler guards preserve the original decision fields in the six amendments. The two new plan installs remain explicitly unrun; the other three additions install nothing (execution limits). The WSL amendment preserves Sol/ultra coordination and Sol/max workers, scopes the Ultra-worker override to the Mac, and leaves destination acceptance gates open. The original lane acknowledgements were read directly. Independent upstream reads confirmed both skill-folder tree/blob bindings, the skills CLI's full-commit fallback, Codex's embedded system-skill cache, and Claude Code tag An independent reader ran these checks in an isolated export of this exact head; the coordinator inspected the retained command/result records:
The earlier combined full three-module run timed out at 60 seconds; its terminal exit is unknown and it is not counted as passing. Its record is retained alongside the selected-test results. These checks are structural/local integration and synthetic fixture evidence, not unchanged upstream suites or destination acceptance. Helper-session provider routing was not exposed and is not attested by this comment. The coordinator re-read the public PR head as |
…yer-consensus-20261002
Owner
Author
|
ACCEPT of the bounded source carryover, exact HEAD Actual full comparisons56473e4b→fd111e59 anddcae68bd→e7a83d49 both contain the same32 PR-owned paths and identical ordered added/removed lines per file:3,536 additions/141 removals, no binary paths. All31 non-registry owned blobs are unchanged. The current registry preserves main's9409 rows, with22 existing owned updates/seven owned additions yielding9416 and no removed main rows. All187 receipts and26 convergence records are identical to main. All92 newly present retirement rows are retained identically, including the retirement receipt registration. The unmerged626 SDK receipt is absent from both main and this candidate, so it is not a lost landed record. Root directly resolved the exact current PR head/base by native API0; the independent bounded original-source/diff comparison also returned0. Primary source is the immutable current tree. No new source behavior or default selection was introduced by this merge. Reported402 local tests/validator/generated checks remain the owner's current-head evidence; this read executes no tests, installs or provider/GPU tasks. Required hosted CI and fresh head/main/shared-path guards continue to govern merge. This verdict does not qualify destination installation, full SDK roles or the unresolved wave2/D3r2 preregistration conditions. Those retain their separate verdicts and owner repairs. Native sign-ins stay native; no credential/auth file or active client configuration was read or copied, and no Claude-owned source path was edited by root. |
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
Owner
Author
Trading lane shared-path ACK for PR #6202026-10-03T07:44Z: ACK at exact head e7a83d4, base dcae68b, in response to the architecture owner's request. Reuse the bounded current-head source ACCEPT and the retained The layer consensus and two-host decision's dated WSL amendment retain the trading selection and its separate measured acceptance gates. This ACK authorizes no broker write, credential transfer, destination migration or qualification claim. NativeStack2604 migration still waits for the architecture lane's explicit installed-foundation handoff. No new local tests, installations, native provider or broker runs, shared-path edits or credential reads were performed. Owner-reported checks remain owner/hosted evidence. Current required checks, exact head/main and thread guards, and the agreed merge order govern landing. The three Monday order-writing timers remain held independently. |
seathatflowsinourveins
deleted the
foundation/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002
branch
October 3, 2026 07:58
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
seathatflowsinourveins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
…uide is on main The skill-lifecycle bullet pointed to adoption/skills/lifecycle.md "(lands with unit F3)". F3 landed in 3361b34 (#553) and the guide is on main, so the parenthesis is stale. Shared hot file (docs/lanes.md): AGENTS.md and its manifests/evidence.json re-registration are this branch's only commit, rebuilt on main d2777ee (#619, #620) with AGENTS.md byte-identical to the acknowledged head 1283e4e. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
Hot-file protocol (docs/lanes.md): the branch's last commit, on main d2777ee (#619, #620). The PR's own diff, without this registry, is byte-identical to the cross-family-accepted head f6a2f68's diff against its base. scripts/validate.py passed; validate_convergence --all-recorded valid (26 records); the verdict review gate passed against origin/main. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
…-16 cause, authority and review date Round 3 of PR #635, answering the reviews of round 2: - tests/test_frozen_macos_variant_no_use.py is now a tripwire for direct references. It matches the artifact directory's name (the parent of variant/) in every file git ls-files lists except the record classes (*.md, evidence/**, manifests/evidence.json, catalogs/**, blueprints/**/*.json), and scans configuration and scripts inside those classes too (package.json and other workspace manifests, .devcontainer/**, *.toml, *.yml, *.yaml, script suffixes, build files, shebangs, executable modes, symbolic links). Whole-file allowances are replaced by 31 pinned lines in 15 files (sha256 of each stripped line, the module's own constant included); a new referencing line fails anywhere, and a pinned line that is no longer found fails too, so a broken scope rule cannot drop a pinned file. git ls-files failing is a failure, not a skip. OS metadata files are ignored in the variant directory, and an absent variant passes. Its docstring states the limit: a route that never spells the name (inventory loop, glob, fragments, Markdown recipe) is not caught. - Mutation checks in a scratch clone: the reconstructed round-2 mutants, the five round-3 mutants and eight added checks fail; the four stated limits and the two allowed cases pass; the unmutated tree passes. The results are retained in the receipt's guard_mutation_checks. - evidence/receipts/dependabot-alert-16-dismissal-20261003.json and the closure record's alert-16 note: Dependabot alerts come from the dependency graph (manifests, lock files and submissions; GitHub Docs read 2026-10-03), so the alert is independent of the OSV exception's scope; the dismissal was made at the user's request of 2026-10-03 under section 8's not_used practice (alerts 7-15); it has no expiry and is rechecked when the frozen OSV exception (ignoreUntil 2026-12-24) is renewed, changed or removed, or when the tripwire fails; the live recipe lock pins next 16.3.8 (the frozen config's 16.3.6 clause predates #587 and is left unedited). The branch is rebased onto main 652c15a (#620, after #639), and the receipt's checked_commit moves to it; the files the receipt cites are identical at e88d59e and 652c15a. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
4 tasks done
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
…log-freshness report (#634) * Track GPT runtime workers, SDKs and agents in the daily catalog-freshness report The daily catalog-freshness report covered the foundation stack and the trading pins only. The GPT-route runtime workers, agent SDKs, the GPT gateway, the evaluation harnesses and coding agents such as pi were not compared with upstream at the pins their runtime records install, so the foundation the trading north star runs on could fall behind without notice. extract_layers.py gains RUNTIME_PIN_SOURCES, 12 pins read at extraction time from the new-WSL install plan rows by slot (a composite row by part), the OpenHands runtime-worker recipe pin record and the native SDK constraints (PEP 503 name match), and RUNTIME_WATCH_SOURCES, 7 watch-only upstreams that a file on main names but no record on main pins (pi, oh-my-pi, the OpenAI Agents SDKs, Crawl4AI, Deep Agents and codex-action). Both resolve into runtime-pins.json. A malformed declaration raises. A record that moved or changed shape yields an entry with "pin": null and an error built only from the declared path and locator, so the daily job keeps its foundation and trading report. github_freshness.py fetches these repositories. build_manifest.py --runtime-freshness-out writes the report-only runtime-freshness.json; the manifest and the trading sidecar stay byte-identical. freshness_propose.py renders it as a separate drift.md table that never sets drift-status.txt and that the propose job never reads. The workflow writes and uploads the sidecar and prints its counts. These rows stay out of TRADING_PIN_SOURCES, whose pins must not repeat a selected card's repository (openai/codex, OmniRoute, inspect_ai and deer-flow are cards) and must sit in a trading taxonomy layer. tests/test_catalog_freshness_runtime.py covers extraction against the checked-in records, the resolver on synthetic records, the fetch, build and report stages and the workflow wiring, with no network. scripts/validate.py reports SHA-256 and byte-count mismatches for the six registered files edited here; they are re-registered in the branch's last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Withhold only the runtime sidecar on a leak-gate trip and tighten the runtime tests Resolves the round-2 review findings on 6bc1199 (none blocking or major). F1: build_manifest.py catches LeakDetected around the runtime sidecar's gate only. A runtime upstream whose own data trips the gate (a third-party tag containing APCA, say) no longer fails the build step and so loses the workflow's diff step and drift report: the sidecar keeps its schema and keys with no entries, every count 0 and the fixed "gate_error": "leak_gate_tripped" (never the matched text or the exception message), the step prints {"runtime_freshness": {"gate_error": "leak_gate_tripped"}} and exits 0. The manifest's and the trading sidecar's leak checks stay fatal. freshness_propose.py renders that document as the runtime heading and one withheld line with no table, and returns runtime_unresolved ["leak_gate_tripped"], so the workflow's counts line shows it. F2: the install-plan test asserts each entry's declared slot and, for the two research-harnesses parts, the part_repository slug at its position. The codex and codex-sdk-and-codex-exec-app-server rows carry identical values, so a swapped slot passed before. F3: watch-only now means no install or runtime record on main pins the upstream (a catalog card may record an evaluated version). The alternative openai-agents-sdk card records v0.22.3 for openai/openai-agents-python, which no table compares. The comments, the build docstring, the README and the drift.md intro say so, and that the stack.json and selected (default/conditional) card pins stay in the other tables. F4: the synthetic constraints give openai-codex-cli-bin 9.9.9, so the PEP 503 test proves the openai_codex line matched. F5: the README says an unresolved row carries its upstream and dormancy only when it has a repository; one without has an empty upstream and the not_fetched dormancy. F6: a test runs extract_layers.main with a call-through spy on resolve_runtime_pins and checks that reserved_ids holds hftbacktest (a trading pin), nautilustrader (a trading card) and codex (a foundation component). F7: an unresolved row without a repository is no longer also listed as unfetched; the unresolved line reports it. A row that kept a declared repository is still listed when it was not fetched. Mutation runs in a scratch copy fail each new assertion on its target defect; the base test file passed the F2 slot-swap and F4 prefix-match mutants. scripts/validate.py reports SHA-256 and byte-count mismatches for the same six registered files as 6bc1199; they are re-registered in the branch's last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Record the GPT runtime tracking decision and log the coverage-claim correction - docs/decisions/2026-10-02-gpt-runtime-tracking.md: the gap by row kind, the tracked entries and their pin records, ownership (the Codex maintenance task owns upstream detection; this table is a report) and the relation to open #633's runtime-job catalog, the search-first sweep (wf_21fc37c5-123: extend the existing job; updatecli, Renovate and nvchecker trialed on copies of the records), the first local run against live GitHub metadata, verification, limits and follow-ups (tag-only rows, registry versions, advisories through OSV-Scanner). - docs/harness-defaults.md: anti-pattern row for stating what a catalog job tracks from where a repository's name appears, inserted at the top of the log table (open #619 appends at its end). - tests/test_catalog_freshness_runtime.py: the leak-gate test also captures stderr and checks that neither stream carries the matched text or the exception message; the reserved-id test checks that each id belongs to exactly one report kind. Both review nits; the stderr check fails when the caught exception is printed (mutation run). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Compare tag-only runtime upstreams by declared tag patterns Inspect AI publishes no GitHub release and its first tag in name order is release/2025-11-28, so new-wsl:inspect-ai was not compared although its newest version tag is 0.3.276 against the pin 0.3.273. watch:codex-action (tags only) and watch:deepagents (a monorepo whose latest release can be another package's) relied on name order or on whichever package released last. - extract_layers.py: an optional "tags" declaration {prefix, pattern} on a runtime pin or watch source, checked at declaration time (a literal prefix, a pattern anchored with ^ and $ that has exactly one capture group), declared on new-wsl:inspect-ai (every tag), watch:codex-action (v) and watch:deepagents (deepagents==); each entry carries it or null. - github_freshness.py: one "gh api repos/{slug}/git/matching-refs/tags/{prefix} --paginate" call per declared prefix, tag names stored under matching_tags; a failure is a partial error that never aborts the batch, and a record without a list for a declared prefix stays pending. - build_manifest.py: build_runtime_freshness takes the highest version among the names the pattern fully matches (the capture as an integer tuple, never name order) as upstream.latest before the pin is compared, with latest_source and matching_tag_count; otherwise tag_pattern_unmatched or tag_pattern_unfetched. - freshness_propose.py: marks a matching-tag latest "(tag)" and lists the unmatched or unfetched rows in one line after the runtime table. References: nvchecker v2.22 nvchecker_source/github.py (use_max_tag with include_regex), Renovate's github-tags datasource, GitHub REST "List matching references"; gh v2.102.0 pkg/cmd/api/pagination.go (paginatedArrayReader). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Keep failed runtime tag lists out of partial errors and unpair matching tags from releases Fixes for the round-3 review findings on 0dadeab7 (no blocking or major defect): - G1: github_freshness.py records a failed matching-refs call under the record's matching_tags_errors ({prefix: reason, cut to 160 characters}) and counts it at the document level as matching_tags_errors, never in partial_errors. A partial error makes freshness_propose.py blank the repository's drift and trading rows (Inspect AI is a selected trading card) and holds the propose job. A record carrying it stays pending; the resume is per repository, so the next run fetches the whole repository again (the contract's permitted fallback). build_runtime_freshness gives that row tag_pattern_unfetched with compute_upstream's other fields, and the report blanks nothing. The fetch's last line also prints the new count. - G2: a matching tag sets released_at and prerelease to None and drops latest_flag; they describe the repository's latest GitHub release, which in a monorepo can be another package's. Dormancy still reads the repository's activity. - G3: the decision record's first-run table shows Inspect AI compared against the matching tag 0.3.276 and behind (round-3 local live run on 2026-10-03, 05:29Z to 05:30Z: 488 repositories, 0 errors; 19 entries, 4 behind, 7 not compared) and keeps the 6bc1199 run as the earlier observation. Verification gives 86 runtime tests, the four registered files of the round-3 hash failure and the round-3 and round-4 mutation runs; Limits says what a failed call does and that the list is read with --paginate within the per-call timeout. - G4: DOTTED_VERSION_RE and the declared pattern compile with re.ASCII, so a tag in fullwidth digits cannot rank; a missing or uncompilable pattern gives tag_pattern_unmatched instead of raising; at most 5,000 names are stored per (repository, prefix), with matching_tags_truncated when a list is cut; the tag-miss sentence and the stale releases/tags/commit text are corrected. Tests: 86 runtime tests (6 new, 8 changed). Mutation check: 29 mutants against the 14 new or changed tests; all 41 mutant/test pairings killed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Correct the round-4 record sentence and the review's wording nits - docs/decisions/2026-10-02-gpt-runtime-tracking.md: in the observed run, Deep Agents' released_at and prerelease came from its own release of the selected tag, so G2's nulling removed correct values there; it guards the monorepo case. Adds the independent live run at the round-4 code (488 repositories, 0 errors, 4 behind) and the forced tag-list failure check. - README and github_freshness docstring: the resume rule names matching_tags_errors and the per-repository refetch. - freshness_propose: the tag-miss sentence says both reasons keep the release or tag listing as latest; the runtime intro says the last-release and last-commit columns describe the repository's activity, not the tag in the latest column. The report test follows the sentence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Keep runtime-only fetch failures out of the propose gate, withhold cut tag lists and check pointer syntax Fixes for the cross-family review of 2d28e04 (gpt-6-astra at max through native codex exec, read-only sandbox), which returned BLOCK: - X1 (major): github_freshness.py knows, per repository, whether a working file other than runtime-pins.json names it (collect_runtime_only_slugs, compared by normalized slug). The top-level errors and partial_errors, which hold the propose job through freshness_propose.py's upstream-errors.txt and upstream-partial-errors.txt and which saturation_ledger.py reads as the freshness input's completeness, count only those repositories (and any retained record that no working file names), as before runtime-pins.json existed. The failures of the runtime-only repositories (five today) count in the new runtime_only_errors and runtime_only_partial_errors, and runtime_only_repositories lists their slugs. Per-record fields and the resume are unchanged. drift.md's runtime section names, in one line, the rows on a runtime-only repository whose fetch failed; nothing in the drift or propose path reads the new counts. The fetch's last line prints them. - X2 (minor): build_manifest.apply_tag_declaration reads matching_tags_truncated. latest_source becomes tag_pattern_truncated, the selected tag stays the latest (compute_upstream's latest when none matched), and a pinned row is not_compared with reason tag_list_truncated; watch-only and unresolved rows keep their reasons. The tag-miss line names the row with its latest_source, and the "(tag)" marker is not shown for it. The flag is per record, so it applies to every declared prefix of that repository. - X3 (minor): extract_layers.py checks pin_pointer, repository_pointer and a row's array against RFC 6901 (JSON_POINTER_RE) when the declaration is checked, so "tag" for "/tag" raises instead of reading as a moved record. - X4 (nit): the decision record's limits say the runtime rows never trigger a proposal, set drift-status.txt or name receipt component ids, but appear in the committed drift.md; its Decision, Verification and Limits sections cover round 5. The README describes the counters and the cut-list rule. docs/github-automation.md's runtime-table paragraph says that a runtime-only failure does not hold the propose job. Tests: 99 runtime tests, 13 of them new; _fake_gh_api can now fail a repository's primary or releases call. Mutation check: 32 mutants against the 13 new tests; all 57 mutant/test pairings killed. Replay at the reviewed head: a runtime-only 503 wrote 1 to upstream-errors.txt (primary call) or upstream-partial-errors.txt (releases call); with round 5 both say 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Say which repositories the runtime-only counters cover The runtime-only counters cover a repository that only runtime-pins.json names (no foundation, trading, trading-pin or star-candidate working file does), not every repository the runtime table is the only table for. The drift sentence and docs/github-automation.md now say that (round-5 review, minor). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-register the seven edited registered files in manifests/evidence.json Hot-file protocol (docs/lanes.md): the branch's last commit, on main d2777ee (#619, #620). The PR's own diff, without this registry, is byte-identical to the cross-family-accepted head f6a2f68's diff against its base. scripts/validate.py passed; validate_convergence --all-recorded valid (26 records); the verdict review gate passed against origin/main. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Scout <scout@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 tasks done
seathatflowsinourveins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
meaning now names this checkpoint's one added gate, gpt-native-lifecycle-convergence, and carries main's 2026-10-02T22:57:25Z meaning verbatim, as 652c15a (#620) does for its predecessor. The previous text appended a sentence after the quoted 2026-10-01 meaning and so misdated both gates. recorded_at_utc is refreshed from date -u. The gate row equals ab628da's, and every other entity equals main's: dropping the gate and restoring main's two metadata fields rebuilds main's bytes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
#620 changed the manifest (three repositories added to the targets, a new role table and not-audited list), so --check failed against main. Re-collected 2026-10-03T13:27Z: 59 repositories, 556 requests, 0 fetch errors; the record's results block regenerated from --results. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
…round's records from blind checkouts The decision record states the result against #602 (and unchanged against #620): agree 22, contest 7, nominates 4, memory cross-check, pin agree 1, pin conflict 1, not settled 7. It frames the contests as slot-level picks that did not weigh job overlap with the installed stack, and discloses the unequal live web evidence (the GPT judges' searches through the gateway returned nothing), amendment 4 and the adjudicator-anonymity limit. run-notes.json carries the timeline, the ordering that kept a family's decisions away from the other family's deciders, and usage. blind_checkout.py withholds the round's top-level records and its decision record; the dossiers stay. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
#620 changed the manifest (three repositories added to the targets, a new role table and not-audited list), so --check failed against main. Re-collected 2026-10-03T13:27Z: 59 repositories, 556 requests, 0 fetch errors; the record's results block regenerated from --results. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
row_kindconsensus, never definitive or measured), the install plan (69 rows), the handbook and the dashboard checkpoint. It also adds a dated amendment that scopes the two-host decision to the Mac host for its worker override, as the Codex lane asked (608#5962894990).56473e4b840f(origin/main, merged in by the hot-file protocol)lane:shared; the Codex lane's read at the exact head is the other lane's acknowledgementevidence/artifacts/new-wsl-layer-consensus-20261002/(new),evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-definitive-defaults-20261001/(assembler step and outputs),evidence/artifacts/new-wsl-install-plan-20261002/(rows, scripts, validation),docs/decisions/2026-10-02-new-wsl-layer-consensus.md(new),docs/decisions/2026-10-01-new-wsl-definitive-defaults.md,docs/decisions/2026-10-02-two-host-north-star-architecture.md(appended amendment only),docs/new-wsl-handbook.*,observability/grand-dashboard/state.json, tests, andmanifests/evidence.json(registrations only)The rule the record states, acknowledged by the Codex lane (608#5959996494): a recorded consensus may add or amend a row; it is never definitive or measured, carries explicit labels, and never replaces a default, a state, a definitive row or a measured result. A "resolved selection" is kept distinct from native qualification.
SOTA sources
The full list, with pins, is in
docs/decisions/2026-10-02-new-wsl-layer-consensus.md("Sources"). The main ones:skill-discovery: vercel-labs/skills7407f389find-skills, installed with skills 1.7.0.skill-authoring: anthropics/skills8a1541c4skill-creator; Codex keeps its embedded skills (rust-v0.160.0).research-skill: GPT Researcher's skill0957c301with gptr-mcp63884773; activation held until its gate returns.cross-family-review: Claude Code local review and the Codex CLI; PR-Agent v0.47.0 only as a comparison.credential-custody: HASP v1.0.43 against the repository's runner and guard, measured.docs/decisions/2026-09-30-sol-primary-quality-defaults.mdlines 13-30 at main56473e4b840f.Evidence-class table
assemble_manifest.py --check,render_tables.py --check,check_plan.py,build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check: exit 0controls.py: exit 0, "all files restored"consensus.jsonand the recordW1-skills-plugins.txt); their acceptance checks have not run anywhereLocal commands run
The change was built, reviewed (four defects, the worst a bash-4.1 errexit dependency in the skill-authoring check), repaired, independently re-verified with no failures, then committed with the provenance and amendment steps by a separate builder.
Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-10-02-new-wsl-layer-consensus.md(new); the two-host decision gains "Amendment 2026-10-03: WSL scope".Host evidence
None in this PR. The destination's stage-1 receipt is a separate PR.
The required
osv-scannercheck is expected to fail on main's frozen historical lock (GHSA-vfj7-8cjw-p6xm,braces3.0.3; issue 384). This PR touches no OSV input; the root lane is preparing the retirement of that replay.🤖 Generated with Claude Code