Repository navigation
Stack manifest: the omniroute row describes the 2026-09-30 builds (held for the trading lane's acknowledgement) - #531
Merged
Conversation
7 tasks done
…42a9ac1 with #13788 and the affinity patch), upstream's v3.8.51 release and the 20129 compression state Text of one row only (upstream_sources, freshness, command_scope); the component pin stays npm 3.8.50 until the published 3.8.51 package has its own isolated install and boot check (a separate change to this row). Shared hot file, so this is its own lane:shared change; the decision record and evidence are in the lane:foundation PR #530 (docs/decisions/2026-09-30-omniroute-rebuild.md). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
force-pushed
the
res-omni-stack-row-20260930
branch
from
September 30, 2026 04:43
2398b64 to
be65860
Compare
Owner
Author
|
Trading lane acknowledgement (
No objection. Merge with this head pinned and 8/8 required checks in bucket |
seathatflowsinourveins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2026
Main contradicts the three "first published" claims. PR #425 (f6e5a03, on main since 2026-09-28T22:57:18Z) already labels 045aa81f3 as 20128's build, and PR #531's stack row (0a41bf8) states the patch on 20128 about eleven minutes before the rebuild record (b4056a3). The record, the routing README addendum and the roadmap update now say only that the rebuild record has the patch running on 20128 in ae5539a56. Cite the PR #425 labels as a coordinator's labels on a source read (the repair round made no gateway request). Note that, read as the running build, they conflict with the rebuild record's account (:30-31, :135-136). Keep 2026-09-29 00:42Z and 2026-09-30 00:03:00Z as upper bounds only: the record neither asserts nor rules out an earlier date. Add 045aa81f3 and its git log -S hits to the [^rebuild] search statement. Narrow the 81c9b6da sentence to the basis, citing the roadmap :51 report of the gateway owner's rebuild in progress. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 of 7 tasks
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2026
#656) * docs: retire the gateway A/B R02 preregistration draft Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: register the R02 retirement record and refresh reports Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: repair the R02 retirement record after review Date the end of the R02 freeze from the rebuild record's own account: 20128 ran 5fc47d970 at 81c9b6da since 2026-09-29 00:42Z, so it had left dd6e9607e by then. The 2026-09-30 rebuild is the first published record of the affinity patch, and part (ii) of the approved patch stays open. Cite the #445 PR description, an author report, for the review rounds, the ninth defect and the test runs, in place of a private file. Restate the owner line from the #445 timeline. Limit the no-run claim to the records, quote the plan's cost-independent adopt-max rule, and name the rebuild file in the roadmap update. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: re-register the repaired R02 retirement documents Re-register the retirement record, the routing README addendum and the roadmap update after the review repair. Both generators left the four reports byte-identical. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: drop the first-published claims from the R02 retirement Main contradicts the three "first published" claims. PR #425 (f6e5a03, on main since 2026-09-28T22:57:18Z) already labels 045aa81f3 as 20128's build, and PR #531's stack row (0a41bf8) states the patch on 20128 about eleven minutes before the rebuild record (b4056a3). The record, the routing README addendum and the roadmap update now say only that the rebuild record has the patch running on 20128 in ae5539a56. Cite the PR #425 labels as a coordinator's labels on a source read (the repair round made no gateway request). Note that, read as the running build, they conflict with the rebuild record's account (:30-31, :135-136). Keep 2026-09-29 00:42Z and 2026-09-30 00:03:00Z as upper bounds only: the record neither asserts nor rules out an earlier date. Add 045aa81f3 and its git log -S hits to the [^rebuild] search statement. Narrow the 81c9b6da sentence to the basis, citing the roadmap :51 report of the gateway owner's rebuild in progress. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: re-register the R02 retirement documents after the re-check Re-register the retirement record, the routing README addendum and the roadmap update after the re-check fixes. Only those three rows changed. Both generators left the four reports byte-identical. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: record the overtaken R02 freeze as a failed condition with its rule Review thread on #656 (P1): the record documented the freeze conflict but named no failed condition or prevention rule. The roadmap's F-WK-3 record "goes in the rebuild's receipt PR" and lists "the user's R02 freeze release" (roadmap :185-188 at 9b0b8d6); the rebuild record, the published account that replaced the 81c9b6da package (:30-32), carries no release; the freeze held "with no end date" (decisions.json:33). Add a "Failed condition" paragraph: it assigns no fault, states the rule (search a host's recorded freezes and ordering conditions before a restart or build switch, and record each release in the switch's own record) and the recovery (record an overtaken freeze in fact, supply no release, carry open items forward). The anti-pattern log row (AGENTS.md:5, docs/harness-defaults.md:85) is outside this retirement's paths and is left to a foundation follow-up. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: re-register the R02 retirement record after the failed-condition paragraph Registry only: the record's files[] row takes its new sha256 and bytes via host_receipts.register_file. The generated reports were re-run with --write and did not change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: qualify the after-R02 trigger as dormant while the retirement stands (root finding at 447f70b) Line 145 said the trigger can no longer occur, but the reopen conditions allow R02 to reopen, and a completed reopened run would satisfy the original after-scored-run predicate (decisions.json:38). Part (ii) of the occupancy patch stays open with its own acceptance gates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-register the R02 retirement record (hot-file protocol, last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Restore main's registry before the last-commit re-registration (hot-file protocol) manifests/evidence.json returns to main 1a64e8f's copy so that the next commit, the branch's last, carries every owned registry row. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-register the R02 retirement record (hot-file protocol, last commit) register_file on main 1a64e8f's registry for the three owned files: the omniroute-routing-20260928 README, the resolved ecosystem roadmap and the R02 retirement record. component_matrix and new_host_grand_list --write changed nothing. The tree equals the merge commit's tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Roadmap: follow the file's same-date heading convention ("<date>, later, main <short sha>") The 2026-10-03 update merged after main's own 2026-10-03 section, so its heading takes the ", later," form the roadmap already uses for a second same-date update (2026-09-29, later, main 16f3c7f), with the short SHA. No anchor link in the repository targets the old heading. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Hot-file protocol: reset manifests/evidence.json to the merge base before the final registry commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Register this branch's files on the merge-base registry (hot-file protocol: every registry edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Hot-file protocol: reset manifests/evidence.json to the merge base before the final registry commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Register this branch's files on the merge-base registry (hot-file protocol: every registry edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Scout <scout@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
manifests/stack.json, theomnirouterow (upstream_sources,freshness,command_scope): it still describes the 2026-09-27 builds. It now says which builds run since 2026-09-30 (upstreamrelease/v3.8.51at2f42a9ac1with the open upstream PR #13788 on both gateways and a local affinity patch on 20128; BUILD_SHAae5539a56on 20128 and87c4c488don 20129; upstream'scheck:pack-booton both tarballs, the 20129 tarball on its third attempt), that both units announce Codex 0.159.1 while the installed Codex is 0.157.1 (sogpt-6.1-solis listed), upstream's own release of 3.8.51 after the rebuild (tagv3.8.51, created 2026-09-30T01:41Z with the same tree as the build base2f42a9ac1; npmomniroute@3.8.51published 02:54Z), and the 20129 compression state (master on; ten of the twelve shipped engines at upstream's per-engine settings, which is not upstream's shipped state; headroom off in the engines map but still running where a stored combo names it; omniglyph off; headerless plansession-dedup, ccr, lite; lossy engines only on a header or combo opt-in; 20128 keeps its master off withcodex/*excluded). The component pin stays npm 3.8.50 until the published 3.8.51 package has its own isolated install and boot check (the row says so; moving the pin is a separate change to this row); no other row, and no code, changes.docs/lanes.mdmakes a change to what a shared hot file sayslane:shared, and it needs the other lane's acknowledgement. The decision record and the evidence for every claim in the row are in thelane:foundationPR OmniRoute rebuild 2026-09-30: decision record, evidence artifacts, owner-record script, unit templates (records what runs; compression on 20128 not applied) #530 (docs/decisions/2026-09-30-omniroute-rebuild.md), which does not touch this file.be91e1f8(main, after SocratiCode 1.16.0: qualification receipt and dated decision update (the Linux pin stays 1.15.0) #523).lane:shared.manifests/stack.json(shared hot file),manifests/evidence.json(its registration through the hot-file protocol; same commit, the last).SOTA sources
release/v3.8.51at2f42a9ac19d1a247ec9ce5473b790843724b3061; carried #13788 (24bbadbad,6c7990058); upstream fixes in the base #14886 and #14812. The row's newupstream_sourcesentries are those commits and pull requests.2f42a9ac1, the live model catalog forgpt-6.1-sol) are listed in PR OmniRoute rebuild 2026-09-30: decision record, evidence artifacts, owner-record script, unit templates (records what runs; compression on 20128 not applied) #530's body and decision record.Evidence-class table
evidence/artifacts/omniroute-rebuild-20260930/receipt.json, claims C1-C11)Local commands run
Only the
omnirouterow differs from main (69 components before and after; the other 68 rows are equal).Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-09-30-omniroute-rebuild.mdin PR #530 (it lists this change under "not in this change" and says why).Host evidence
This PR touches no
evidence/hosts/file and no receipt.scripts/validate.py(exit 0 above).lane:shared), as a comment or review on the head.platform_statuschange.Residuals
Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code