Skip to content

Paper lane: ext-20260928 receipt (broker-reconciled), committed reconciliation, dashboard paper row - #501

Merged
seathatflowsinourveins merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/paper-ext-20260928-receipt
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

seathatflowsinourveins merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/paper-ext-20260928-receipt

Conversation

@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

This is roadmap move P-NOW-1: a sanitized receipt for the 2026-09-28 extended-hours mover series ext-20260928 on paper account 2, plus the grand-dashboard paper row.

  • 8 attempts, 2 passed (trials 3 and 8).
    • Attempt 1 was refused at check: the gain unit mismatched (G20 in the scan against G0.20). It was fixed from attempt 2 on.
    • Attempts 2 and 4-7 were refused at preflight with benchmark_quotes_not_ready: no SPY quote within 3 s after hours. None sent an order.
  • 10 orders (5 entries, 5 exits), all limit, day and extended hours, all filled. 23 fills. Realized P&L −8.91 USD. No rejects, cancels, engine errors or recoveries. The account was flat at the end of every attempt.
  • Broker reconciliation. It ran read-only on 2026-09-29, through the pointer $PAPER_ENV_FILE_2. 23/23 engine fills match broker fill activities on quantity, price and execution id; 10/10 orders agree; broker-derived P&L is −8.91; 0 positions and 0 open orders. The tool (reconcile_ext_series.py) and its stdout are committed with sha256, exit code and pointer-form argv.
  • Committed alongside: sanitized engine receipts (mover-paper-2..8.json, only broker order refs withheld), the freeze frozen-3058b237.SHA256SUMS, the run consoles, and a per-field provenance map (asserted, single-source, derived, literal).
  • Code: main 3058b237. The 60 frozen-hash files match it, as does every hashed adaptive-paper source.
  • Dashboard: the paper row now carries this series and a dated account-1 status: the 401 blocker was resolved on 2026-09-28, and a regular-hours series is frozen for 2026-09-29.

Limitations

  • The run came from a volatile scratch checkout. This is metadata plus broker-reconciled evidence, not a frozen gate run.
  • Account 2's designated role. The forward protocol (incentive-monitor/forward-protocol-v1.json:63) and docs/secret-storage.md designate account 2 as the isolated incentive-study account. This mover series traded on it, with its own engine state root. Referred to the forward-protocol owner, the trading lane.
  • Residual: tool hash timing. tool_sha256 equals the committed tool, but it was recorded at commit time. The tool was edited during the builder session around its 07:29Z run, so run-time byte identity is asserted by the builder rather than independently re-proven. The coordinator's read-only re-run was blocked by secret_path_guard (environment_dump false positive, reported to the guard owner). The committed stdout's totals are independently consistent with the engine's receipts.

Review

  • An Opus evidence-reviewer returned changes-needed (2 medium, 6 low, 5 gaps), all repaired in this commit.
  • The verifier stage ended without a verdict: it hit its turn limit, not a refusal. The coordinator re-checked: validate.py passed, evidence_manifest --check passed, receipt sha256s match their files, gitleaks is clean, and the private-detail scan found 0 hits (fingerprints, host paths, lock names).
  • No GPT-6 round: the Codex weekly window was at 94%.

Lane

lane:shared, because the change alters a shared hot file's text (the state.json paper row). The author holds the trading lane, and the foundation lane is asked for an acknowledgement. The hot-file protocol was applied on origin/main 703b2bd7.

SOTA sources

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:shared Touches files owned by both lanes; needs both lanes' acknowledgement label Sep 29, 2026
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Foundation lane acknowledgement (docs/lanes.md:149-150) at head 10cdd8c6, from the foundation-lane session native-agent-stack-76.

Scope of this acknowledgement: only the two shared hot files this PR changes.

  • observability/grand-dashboard/state.json: recorded_at_utc and the paper lane row's title, state and evidence_ref. No foundation lane, worker or gate row changes, and the new evidence_ref (blueprints/us-equities/adaptive-paper/trials/ext-20260928/README.md) exists in the PR.
  • manifests/evidence.json: registrations for the new ext-20260928 files and the new hash of state.json. I checked all 17 other changed files against the registered sha256 and bytes at this head: no mismatch and none unregistered.

Not reviewed: the trading content under blueprints/us-equities/adaptive-paper/trials/ext-20260928/ and the paper figures quoted in the row. No foundation path is touched. The merger still reads the required checks before merging (gh pr checks 501 --required: 8 required, some pending when I looked).

@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Residual closed. The coordinator re-ran the committed reconcile_ext_series.py (sha256 50b9da4c…) read-only at 08:11Z, through the pointer $PAPER_ENV_FILE_2: exit 0. Its output matches the committed reconcile-ext-series.stdout.json on all 26 keys, apart from the timestamp and interpreter-version fields: 0 differences. So the committed tool reproduces the committed reconciliation. The earlier guard block was a false positive: set( in inline heredoc Python reads as the set builtin. The comparison now runs from a file.

@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the claude/paper-ext-20260928-receipt branch from 10cdd8c to 55abf9a Compare September 29, 2026 08:11
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Rebased onto main under the hot-file protocol, now at head 55abf9a6. manifests/evidence.json was taken from main and re-registered. The state.json diff against main is unchanged from the foundation-acknowledged head 10cdd8c6: recorded_at_utc and the paper row only. validate.py and evidence_manifest --check pass. Auto-merge is armed, guarded to this head.

@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins enabled auto-merge (squash) September 29, 2026 08:11
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the claude/paper-ext-20260928-receipt branch from 55abf9a to 3b41d36 Compare September 29, 2026 14:28
…ized engine receipts and field provenance

Sanitized receipt of the 2026-09-28 extended-hours mover series ext-20260928 on the second
Alpaca paper account: 2 of 8 attempts passed, 10 orders filled, -8.91 USD, broker-reconciled flat.
Mechanics-only; no gate row changes.

Review fixes:
- Reconciliation tool committed with its byte-identical stdout. The ledger path is now an
  argument and is read before any broker request. Re-run once, read-only, through the pointer
  form (exit 0). receipt.json records the tool and stdout sha256 and the pointer-form argv.
- Sanitized copies of the seven engine receipts (broker_order_ref withheld), the freeze
  SHA256SUMS and the four series consoles, each scanned and hash-bound to its private source.
- field_provenance names asserted, single-source, derived and literal fields. New asserts cover
  23 of 23 fills at the reference quote, notional, per-leg P&L, and the ledger's realized P&L,
  gross loss and cash delta.
- Corrected wording: retry timing, the mark-to-market peak, the narrowed checkout claim, the
  freeze's open trial count, the unfrozen series scripts (deviation), the journal exit-record
  query, and account 2's incentive-study designation, referred to the trading lane.
- The grand-dashboard paper row keeps account 1's dated status.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the claude/paper-ext-20260928-receipt branch from 3b41d36 to 40375e1 Compare September 29, 2026 14:28
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

CI fix and rebase, now at head 40375e1e. The required validate check failed on tests.test_order_throughput.EvidenceFileTests. Its scanner walked every trials/*.json and asserted the fixed 2026-09-24 totals, so this PR's committed engine receipts moved a dated record.

rate_limit_evidence.py now reads the 14 trial files that the committed rate-limit-evidence-20260924.json lists (DATED_TRIAL_FILES), instead of every trials/*.json. A new test, test_a_later_trial_receipt_does_not_change_the_dated_evidence, adds a later trial with rate-limit headers and asserts the totals stay the same. It fails on the old code (AttributeError, with the existing test failing on the moved totals).

  • tests.test_order_throughput: 76 OK.
  • rate_limit_evidence.py --check: passed.
  • validate.py and evidence_manifest --check: passed.

The scanner file sits in two historical trials' frozen SHA256SUMS, as a record of that run; no test enforces those lists against HEAD. The hot-file protocol was reapplied on main. The state.json diff is unchanged from the foundation-acknowledged content.

@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins merged commit df41236 into main Sep 29, 2026
25 checks passed
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins deleted the claude/paper-ext-20260928-receipt branch September 29, 2026 14:53
seathatflowsinourveins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2026
…cord

#501 (df41236) made rate_limit_evidence.py read a fixed DATED_TRIAL_FILES
set, so that a trial committed later cannot move the 2026-09-24 totals. That
set was built on main, where this branch's two mover trials were not yet
merged. They also ran on 2026-09-24, and this branch's record already counts
them (1693 trading and 16 data headers). After the merge, --check reported
the record stale and test_rate_limit_evidence_is_current_and_matches_brief
failed (705/14 built vs 1693/16 committed).

- Append trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-a/mover-paper.json and
  trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-c/mover-paper.json to DATED_TRIAL_FILES.
  `--write` reproduces the committed record byte for byte, and `--check`
  passes.
- test_a_later_trial_receipt_does_not_change_the_dated_evidence: expect
  the dated totals with the mover trials (16 and 1693). A later trial
  still does not move them.

rate_limit_evidence.py is outside the brief's path list, so this change is
a separate commit. To drop it, revert this commit and restore main's
rate-limit-evidence-20260924.json, its order-throughput/README.md row and
the test_order_throughput.py totals line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2026
…the partial-fill precision fix (#205)

* Mover mode's first paper run (Mac) and the partial-fill precision fix

Trial mover-mac-20260924a ran the mover trial mode against Alpaca paper for the
first time: five scanner-selected entries and three X2 exits filled, then GRML's
exit filled in parts at 15.00 and 15.01. Alpaca's six-decimal cumulative average
(15.000833) made the native adapter derive 15.009996 and stop with
cumulative_fill_precision_requires_reconciliation. Forced recovery sold the rest;
the account reconciled flat, P&L +0.87 USD, recover proof passed. The trial record
and its offline verifier are under trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-a/.

native_adapter.execution_price takes each fill's own execution price from the
trade-update event when its quantity equals the new shares and it agrees with the
reported average; otherwise it rounds the derived price only when the average's
reporting bound is under half a price unit. Anything else still stops the adapter.
The new native tests reproduce the run's arithmetic and fail on the previous adapter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Register the Mac mover trial record and re-registered sources in the evidence manifest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add the mover trial's decision stream (events.jsonl is ignored by *.jsonl; force-added like the stop drill's)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Count the mover trial's rate-limit headers in the order-throughput evidence (1149 trading, 14 data)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Re-register the order-throughput evidence in the evidence manifest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Resolve fills on the notional grid in one shared module, for the adapter and the ledger

An independent pre-merge review (Codex, a different model family) found the first
version too narrow: rounding assumed one price per snapshot delta, the tolerance came
from the normalized string's exponent, an exactly representable derived price was
accepted without an ambiguity check, a contradictory execution event was replaced by a
derived price, and the ledger's limit check still halted on rounded averages at the
limit (1 x 100.00 then 2 x 100.01 at 100.01 derives 100.0100005).

fills.resolve_execution now accepts an execution event only when its price is on the
grid and agrees with the average (else fill_event_price_requires_reconciliation), and
otherwise requires the new shares' notional to be the only whole number of ticks
strictly within filled x 0.000001 of the report, dividing into an on-grid price per
share. It computes in its own decimal context. The ledger's limit check halts only on
a violation that is certain within fills.incremental_notional_bound. Each counterexample
from the review is a test; the ledger test fails on main's safety.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Re-register the fill-resolution sources and tests in the evidence manifest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Keep the ledger's limit check unchanged; track its rounded-average false halt separately

The delta review of the previous commit found that loosening the ledger's limit check
by the rounding bound lets a real one-tick violation pass on large 4-decimal orders
(buy limit 0.9354, 99 x 0.9354 then 1 x 0.9355, reported 0.935401). A correct check
needs grid resolution of both cumulative notionals, fractional-share handling and a
chosen trade-off between false halts and missed violations, which belongs in its own
change. safety.py is back to main; the guard test that a certain violation halts stays
(it passes on main). The adapter's fill resolution (fills.py) is unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Re-register the reverted ledger sources in the evidence manifest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Record mover trial C (Mac, 2026-09-24 14:52 ET): X1 blocked by stale quotes, needs_attention, not flat

The second broker run of the mover mode (engine at d7a11b3, the first fill-fix version;
no partial fills occurred): four entries filled at the quoted ask; GCTK was skipped.
After a market-data websocket reconnect at 15:49, PFSA and SRZN quotes stayed stale,
the transport's 3 s required-symbol freshness froze it, and X1 at 15:58 never sent.
The hard flatten latched at 16:01:22 and GRML's sell was attempted but never reached
Alpaca (client-ID 404). Recovery fails closed on that ambiguous intent ("owned intent
absent from complete snapshot"), and after-hours quotes are too sparse for the
freshness rule even at the 30 s maximum. Four paper positions remain open pending an
operator decision. The verifier now separates integrity checks from reported outcomes,
and the order-throughput evidence counts the new headers (1629 trading, 15 data).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Register mover trial C and the recounted order-throughput evidence in the evidence manifest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Drop fills.py, its tests and the adapter hook; #221 books each execution

#221 (8bd4ca7, merged 2026-09-25) books each trade_updates fill as its own
execution and closes fill gaps from GET /v2/account/activities/FILL, so the
adapter never derives a price from a cumulative average. That supersedes
fills.py's inference (trading-lane proposal on PR #205, step 1).

- Remove blueprints/us-equities/adaptive-paper/fills.py and
  tests/test_adaptive_paper_fills.py.
- Restore native_adapter.py, tests/test_adaptive_paper_native.py and
  README-mover.md to the merge base, so the merge takes main's versions.
  The native test changes exercised fills.py's price recovery from rounded
  averages (dropped). The same-quantity average-correction test duplicates
  main's test_same_quantity_with_a_changed_average_still_freezes (dropped).
- Keep tests/test_adaptive_paper_safety.py's
  test_a_certain_limit_violation_still_halts: main's ledger still books a
  cumulative-only observation from the averages, with a rounding tolerance,
  and this is the only test that a certain violation still halts there.
- source-hashes.json: the base copy, re-pinned for the kept safety test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Count the 2026-09-24 mover trials' headers in the dated rate-limit record

#501 (df41236) made rate_limit_evidence.py read a fixed DATED_TRIAL_FILES
set, so that a trial committed later cannot move the 2026-09-24 totals. That
set was built on main, where this branch's two mover trials were not yet
merged. They also ran on 2026-09-24, and this branch's record already counts
them (1693 trading and 16 data headers). After the merge, --check reported
the record stale and test_rate_limit_evidence_is_current_and_matches_brief
failed (705/14 built vs 1693/16 committed).

- Append trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-a/mover-paper.json and
  trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-c/mover-paper.json to DATED_TRIAL_FILES.
  `--write` reproduces the committed record byte for byte, and `--check`
  passes.
- test_a_later_trial_receipt_does_not_change_the_dated_evidence: expect
  the dated totals with the mover trials (16 and 1693). A later trial
  still does not move them.

rate_limit_evidence.py is outside the brief's path list, so this change is
a separate commit. To drop it, revert this commit and restore main's
rate-limit-evidence-20260924.json, its order-throughput/README.md row and
the test_order_throughput.py totals line.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Re-register this branch's files in the evidence manifest (hot-file protocol)

docs/lanes.md hot-file protocol, merge path. The merge took main's
manifests/evidence.json unchanged. This commit registers, through
scripts/host_receipts.register_file:
- the changed files main's manifest already lists:
  adaptive-paper/source-hashes.json, order-throughput/rate_limit_evidence.py,
  tests/test_adaptive_paper_safety.py and tests/test_order_throughput.py;
- the 37 new trial-record files this branch registered
  (trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-a/ and trials/mac-2026-09-24-mover-c/).

Not re-added: order-throughput/README.md and
rate-limit-evidence-20260924.json. They are changed, not new, and main's
manifest does not list them. fills.py and tests/test_adaptive_paper_fills.py
are gone, and main's manifest never listed them.

scripts/component_matrix.py --write and scripts/new_host_grand_list.py
--write left their reports unchanged. scripts/validate.py passed
(8669 hashed files), and scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check passed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: seathatflowsinourveins <234074349+seathatflowsinourveins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Scout <scout@local>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lane:shared Touches files owned by both lanes; needs both lanes' acknowledgement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant