Preserve OmniRoute feature research and settle October 3 remeasurement promises by seathatflowsinourveins · Pull Request #423 · seathatflowsinourveins/native-agent-stack

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-09-27T18:31:36Z

Scope

Preserve the 2026-09-27 research record for all 55 OmniRoute features and its 98 evidence files, then append an October 3 settlement of every remeasurement promise. Restore the account-pool record's dated historical text and add one October 3 closure update; register the owned records and evidence through the existing hot-file protocol.

Base: main 4ced2923063db6a6dcafa9f25af5ee05a4153c75, merged in at eb548e51d during the review round. The custody merge (7e22f1445) was against 9b0b8d6d25f9e3fb8f71770500e774170423315e, and the status section's repository citations stay pinned there; main's only later commit changed AGENTS.md and its registry row, and the section cites neither.
Head: 3716acfd984cf521415b0c4f8b48bae040a521d1.
Lane: lane:foundation.
Owned paths touched: docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-feature-resolution.md, docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-account-pool.md, the 71 files under evidence/artifacts/omniroute-features-20260927/, the 27 files under evidence/artifacts/qmd-scope-embed-20260927/, and manifests/evidence.json.
The four matrix/grand-list reports were regenerated with their supported --write commands and kept unchanged bytes.

Main was merged into the branch rather than rebased: main already cites the original record and verdict at e2e048053b151ac9c2ba269864cb4adf035058d3, and the no-force-push path preserves that commit as an ancestor. The record's lines 1-2 and 4-146, its verdict JSON, all 98 evidence files, and its failed-attempt/usage records are byte-identical. Line 3 retains its old text as a prefix. The frozen qmd README's incorrect Amendment 3 claim is corrected in the appended record. The account-pool record matches main plus one dated sub-bullet. No evidence sanitization was demanded or made.

History note (review finding 5): contract step 2 asked the custody merge to take main's account-pool record before committing. Merge commit 7e22f1445 still carried the PR's in-place rewrites of that record's lines 102 and 489; the next commit, a60d8c10d, restored main's text. The final tree and the squash result are unaffected.

SOTA sources

The settlement follows pinned repository records and direct upstream sources, with every claim re-read. The issue/PR GETs and the destination-owner comment were stamped in the same command at 2026-10-03T10:34:43Z; the v3.8.51 tag was peeled at 10:35:05Z, and the replacement comment/source read was stamped at 10:35:45Z. The destination build and posture are reported, not independently observed by this builder. These are the sources cited by the appended status section:

The registration/generation workflow is native-agent-stack at the base SHA, docs/lanes.md:94-141, using scripts/host_receipts.py's register_file, scripts/component_matrix.py and scripts/new_host_grand_list.py. The secret-scanner pin is gitleaks/gitleaks v8.30.1, commit 83d9cd684c87d95d656c1458ef04895a7f1cbd8e, as recorded in blueprints/convergence-practice/wsl-native-tools/pins.json; the installed version read matches 8.30.1.

Sources added by the review round, cited in the status section's rows a, b, d, e and f. The repository files are read at the same 9b0b8d6d2 pin. The two contents GETs, together with the codex.ts reads at both commits, were stamped by date -u in the same command at 2026-10-03T12:58:08Z-12:58:11Z.

Evidence-class table

Claim	Evidence class	Command / receipt
Dated upstream and repository settlements; destination owner's reported build/posture	`source_review`	Pinned citations above and stamped GitHub GETs; historical receipts are reread, with no new model/gateway run
Frozen record spans, line-3 prefix, 98 evidence files and ancestor preserved; account-pool is main plus one dated bullet	`local_integration`	Exact diff/ancestor commands below, on head `3716acfd9`
Registry, generated reports and repository evidence/catalog/convergence integrity	`local_integration`	Existing repository validation commands below, on head `3716acfd9`; structural consistency only
Full repository unittest suite	`local_integration`	Not repeated in the review round. The builder's sandboxed run on the prepared `9b0b8d6d2` merge exited 1 (9,919 tests, 484 failures, 194 errors, 863 skips). That the sandbox caused this stays unproven until CI `validate`, which runs `python3 -m unittest` (`.github/workflows/validate.yml:219`), passes on the final head
Changed-text privacy scan	`local_integration`	0 emails, UUIDs, home paths and host user names across the 28,781 added lines of `origin/main...3716acfd9`
Secret scan	`local_integration`	Local `gitleaks dir` was not run in the review round; the builder's attempt was blocked before scanning. The pre-commit gitleaks 8.30.1 staged scan reported no leaks on each of the round's three commits. CI `secret-scan` on the final head is the full scan

Local commands run

Run in the review round on head 3716acfd984cf521415b0c4f8b48bae040a521d1, with TMPDIR set to the session's test directory; output capture paths are private and omitted. Numbers 1-11 and 14 refer to the contract's acceptance commands.

1. git merge-base --is-ancestor e2e048053b151ac9c2ba269864cb4adf035058d3 HEAD
   exit 0; no output
2. git diff --exit-code e2e048053b151ac9c2ba269864cb4adf035058d3 HEAD -- evidence/artifacts/omniroute-features-20260927 evidence/artifacts/qmd-scope-embed-20260927
   exit 0; no output
3. diff of sed -n '1,2p;4,146p' over the record at e2e04805 and at HEAD (both read with git show)
   exit 0; no output; the new line 3 begins with the old line 3: True
4. git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD   (origin/main = 4ced2923063db6a6dcafa9f25af5ee05a4153c75)
   exit 0; 101 paths: the 98 evidence files, the two records and manifests/evidence.json;
   docs/foundation-stack.md, manifests/stack.json and AGENTS.md absent
5. python3 scripts/validate.py
   exit 0; {"components": 69, "hashed_files": 9519, "profiles": 4, "receipts": 187, "status": "passed"}
   Integrity and scope checks only; no live provider or GPU execution.
6. python3 scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check
   exit 0; {"files": 9519, "status": "passed"}
7. python3 scripts/host_receipts.py validate
   exit 0; {"receipts": 182, "status": "passed"}
8. python3 scripts/validate_convergence.py --all-recorded --root . --json
   exit 0; 26 records, aggregate valid true, no record with errors; no rebinding needed
9. python3 scripts/component_matrix.py --check
   exit 0; {"rows": 32, "status": "checked"}
   python3 scripts/new_host_grand_list.py --check
   exit 0; {"status": "passed", "layers": 32, "winners": 66}
10. python3 scripts/build_ecosystem.py --check
    exit 0; status passed, bytes 15087700, 8 architecture_pin_drift rows
11. python3 scripts/validate_catalogs.py
    exit 0; {"beyond_star_catalog_repositories": 102, "models": 20, "public_stars": 357, "repository_entries": 154, "starred_catalog_repositories": 46, "unique_catalog_repositories": 148}
    python3 scripts/validate_foundation.py --root . --json
    exit 0; ok true; layers 20, decisions 54, foundation_components 61, domain_components 7, evidence_receipts 84, candidates 3, errors []
14. value-free changed-text scan over git diff origin/main...HEAD
    exit 0; 28,781 added lines: emails 0, UUIDs 0, home paths 0, host user names 0
git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
    exit 0; no output
python3 -B -m unittest (the three pre-push registry test methods; zizmor 1.30.1 on PATH)
    exit 0; Ran 3 tests, OK, no skips
git push origin HEAD:claude/omniroute-feature-resolution-20260927
    exit 0; 81f3bcf2e..3716acfd9, fast-forward; the pre-push hook ran the three registry tests on 3716acfd9: OK

Registration, in the last commit 3716acfd9: manifests/evidence.json is main's copy at 4ced29230. The documented host_receipts.register_file one-liner then registered the two records and the 98 evidence files, and both --write generators exited 0 ({"flip_rule_violations": 0, "rows": 32, "status": "written"} and {"status": "written", "layers": 32, "winners": 66}), leaving the four reports byte-identical. Against main, 99 rows were added and the account-pool row changed; receipts[] and convergence_records[] are unchanged, no other row changed, files[] is sorted, and every owned row's sha256 and byte count match its file.

Acceptance 12 (full suite) and 13 (local gitleaks dir) were not repeated in this round; see the evidence-class table. Acceptance 15 follows this edit.

Checks

Local acceptance 1-11 and 14 pass on 3716acfd9, with the frozen content preserved and the privacy scan clear. Two items remain with CI: the full unittest suite, which only the builder's sandboxed run exercised (exit 1), and the full secret scan. CI validate, validate-macos and secret-scan on 3716acfd9 decide them. A description edit restarts validate.yml, so the merging session reads gh pr checks 423 --required after this edit and merges only on 8 required checks, buckets: pass (docs/lanes.md:157-174).

The builder's failure triage stays as context: parsing all 678 failure/error blocks found no direct reference to either owned record or either owned evidence directory. That is triage, not a baseline comparison.

Review round

One independent Opus review at max effort, cross-family to the GPT-6.1 Sol builder, read head 81f3bcf2e and returned repair: three should-fix findings and three minor ones. One repair round under 0c's custody (Claude Opus 5.5) merged main 4ced29230 at eb548e51d, repaired the records at ff336b66d and re-registered at 3716acfd9.

#	Severity	Finding	Disposition
1	should-fix	Row e put D03 on unit D3's A/B. The routing record names only D04, D06 and D11, and its line 95 says unit D3 "is not #423's feature D03"	Applied. The unit-D3 hold names D04, D06 and D11. D03 joins R02, L01, L02, L04, S01 and S04 as open with its consuming lane, under original lines 56 and 136, and the row cites the routing adjudication's P4 hold, which defers it to a D03 combo A/B
2	should-fix	Row d's "now assigns" implied an effort-cap change at v3.8.51	Applied. Contents GETs stamped 2026-10-03T12:58:08Z-12:58:11Z return blob `627f2a339fb0c3ddd5d26c35056842684dd8e1a1` for `reasoningSuffix.ts` at `a58000c7` and at the peeled `v3.8.51` commit `c1e30b76`; a content diff exits 0, and the `MAX_EFFORT_BY_MODEL` and `clampEffort` blocks of `codex.ts` diff identical. The row now says the effort-cap trigger did not fire and the condition fired on the re-pin. GPT-6.1 Sol is in neither alias set, so `clampEffort` caps it at `xhigh`; `max` reaches the wire through the PR 15167 carry on 20128 (`cf6748d04`; rebuild record line 126)
3	should-fix	Rows a, b and f treated the published `post_apply_checks.py` as the definition behind the 36-check aggregates	Applied. The rows cite the 00:40:42Z rewrite and the unretained 36-check version (rebuild record lines 172-176 and 187-189), the printed `checks=40` and the differing check names (recorded outputs lines 18-19 and 56; script lines 206, 240 and 277). The 20129 handoff flag stays printed (line 14), and both 20129 flags cite the routing lane's 2026-09-28 read-back (`decisions.json` lines 136-137). The 20128 flags, the 20129 emergency-fallback flag at the apply and the armed exact cache at `2f42a9ac1` are settled as inferred, not printed. The last printed cache read is the `dd6e9607e` route map (`route-mapper-final.json` lines 159-160). The section-C elimination argument is not used, because the contract's "never write passed" instruction stands until 0c lifts it
4	minor	The account-pool quote dropped the retained code span	Applied. It now reads "release-green again at `a58000c76`", byte-exact to `last_comments[2].body` in `upstream-issue-14866.json`
5	minor	Merge commit `7e22f1445` carried the in-place account-pool rewrites	Noted; no content repair, as the review advised. The history note is under Scope
6	minor	Verification gaps	(1) The required-check read follows this edit, and the merging session owns it. (2) The full suite was not re-run; CI `validate` on `3716acfd9` decides it. (3) Acceptance 5-11 were re-run on `3716acfd9` and all exit 0. (4) Main `4ced29230` was merged through the hot-file protocol, with the registry in the last commit. (5) The negative search was re-run by identifier at `9b0b8d6d2` for D03, R02, L01, L02, L04, S01 and S04. Its OmniRoute hits are holds and plans: routing record line 95, adjudication P4, `route-mapper-final.json` lines 114 and 406, and the R02 freeze in `decisions.json`. Its other hits are unrelated labels (trading, CodeQL, RTK). Row h's searches were not repeated. (6) The builder's 10:34:43Z-10:35:45Z stamps stay as recorded; the reviewer re-read the same states at 12:39Z

Re-review scope: git diff --stat 81f3bcf2e 3716acfd9 over the two records and the two evidence directories reports only the two records (13 insertions, 6 deletions: rows a, b, d, e and f, seven new link definitions and the quote). The evidence directories are unchanged. The other paths changed since 81f3bcf2e are main's AGENTS.md line, through the merge, and manifests/evidence.json.

Residuals: CI validate (with the full suite), validate-macos and secret-scan on the final head, and 0c's decision on the section-C reading.

Decision record

docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-feature-resolution.md, appended Status on 2026-10-03 section. It preserves the dated verdict, settles each promise, names the remaining owners and directs the next sweep toward later-build mechanisms, per-lane quality/token A/B, zero-reasoning quality, search recall, structured output and qmd qualification on the new E2E baseline. A new matching measured run, rather than the existence of a newer build or a structural check, closes a measurement promise.

Host evidence

Not applicable: this change adds no evidence/hosts/ receipt or platform-status change.

Checklist

No workflow changes; the pinned-workflow and top-level-permissions requirements are unaffected.
No secrets are printed or committed, and no new required secret is introduced.
No new paid hosting, subscription or billing surface is introduced.
Peer-owned files and worktrees are preserved.
Full local acceptance is green.
Independent Opus/max review is recorded, with at most one repair round and residual findings listed.
Final committed head is ready, with all 8 required checks in the single pass bucket after the last push/body edit.

… review of #423) - States are recommended dispositions. The record now separates observed state: UNIVERSAL_CONTEXT_HANDOFF_ENABLED and OMNIROUTE_EMERGENCY_FALLBACK are on by default, inert today, and turning them off is a new top action. - The verdict carries each refutation's material findings (refutation_findings, 38 features), which override the proposal's descriptive text where they conflict. - Session affinity corrected: without a header the key falls back to body ids, prompt_cache_key, then a first-input hash (sessionAffinityPin.ts L197-221); session_tag is a tracked conversation id (conversationTracker.ts), not per request. - The categorical "no per-lane opt-in" is narrowed. Exact-model exclusions leave suffixed variants eligible (exclusions.ts L50-70): an untested selector. - Retained the observations that were only quoted: the effort read-back, account-spread counts, probe returns (as .json; *.jsonl is ignored), the cognee structured-output receipt, tool counts, synth-r1 error events, the #14866 closure and the qmd model identity. - machineId masked in the snapshot and in the sanitizer; the lite.ts path, compression counts, preamble condition and combo effort tier corrected; qmd medians recomputed as true medians (7.8 s, 119.65 s); a known model-count error annotated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-09-27T18:49:47Z

Cross-family review, one repair round.

GPT-6 (gpt-6-astra, effort max) reviewed head a27e4e9c through the packaged landscape-sweep lane. Verdict: request_changes, with 6 medium findings, 10 low and 1 nit. It reproduced claims with the pinned helpers. The repair is 94d122cb, then 59033c92, where manifests/evidence.json is re-registered.

Medium

States read as applied configuration. The record now calls the states recommended dispositions and separates the observed state: the UNIVERSAL_CONTEXT_HANDOFF_ENABLED and OMNIROUTE_EMERGENCY_FALLBACK flags are on by default and inert. Turning them off is a new top action.
The final verdict kept refuted descriptive claims. Each corrected or refuted feature now carries its material refutation_findings (38 features), which override the proposal's text.
Measured claims were uncommitted. Now retained:
- probe returns as .json (*.jsonl is git-ignored);
- the effort read-back and account-spread counts;
- the cognee structured-output receipt;
- tool counts, synth-r1 error events, the #14866 closure (gh api) and the qmd model identity.
machineId in the redacted snapshot. Masked, and added to the sanitizer.
Session affinity was wrong. Without a header, the key falls back to body ids, prompt_cache_key and then a first-input hash (sessionAffinityPin.ts L197-221). session_tag is a conversation id tracked across turns, not a per-request id.
"No per-lane opt-in" was too categorical. Exact-model exclusions leave suffixed variants eligible, which is recorded as an untested selector.

Low and nit: the compression counts (17 hold, 3 N/A, 1 enabled) and the lite.ts path; the preamble measurement limited to requests without a system message; the combo effort tier per role; qmd medians recomputed as true medians (7.8 s, 119.65 s); the merge input layout documented; and the known RH5 model count error annotated.

Checks: validate.py passed (7,439 files), evidence_manifest.py --check passed, gitleaks found no leaks, and my own leak scan found 0 emails, UUIDs or private paths.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-09-27T19:56:27Z

Correction: Codex CLI effort claim (3fb6e2b, registered in 95e0a26)

Top action 2 said Codex CLI lanes "already pass model_reasoning_effort=max and logged max/max". A read-only call_logs measurement on the shared gateway disproves that for part of their traffic (probes/codex-effort-coverage-20260927.json, from scripts/codex_effort_coverage.py.txt):

Totals, 12:00–20:00Z (codex/gpt-6-astra on /v1/responses): 616 rows carried no effort, and each had 0 reasoning tokens; 3,809 ran at max/max.
They are full task turns, not auxiliary calls: median input 28k tokens (p90 118k), median output 190.
Per gateway conversation: 72 start with one no-effort row, 89 mix them in otherwise, and 94 multi-row conversations are all max. So the cause may depend on how a lane sets its effort. It is being traced at rust-v0.157.1.
Rollout matching: token-save-practice-gpt6 matched rows to rollouts and found the first request of a codex exec session and every spawn_agent request without effort.

Changes:

Top action 2 now tells Codex lanes to use the -max suffix too. The suffix sets effort at the gateway whatever the client sends.
New limitation: some turns of this run's own GPT-6 dives and refutations may have run without reasoning. Job windows overlap other lanes, so no row is attributed to a job.
The final verdict and build_verdict.py.txt carry the same corrected text. The interim verdict and prompts/synth.md keep the original wording as historical inputs, noted in the README.

scripts/validate.py and evidence_manifest.py --check pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-09-27T20:04:02Z

Withdrawn: the earlier "no effort" correction (22e2df2, registered in 48dff7e)

The earlier correction (3fb6e2b) read blank call_logs effort columns as missing effort. That was wrong. call_logs fills reasoning_effort_requested and reasoning_effort_upstream only when the response carries encrypted reasoning (src/lib/usage/callLogs.ts L646-653). A turn that returned no reasoning logs blank, whatever was sent.

What was sent (probes/codex-sent-effort-20260927.json, stored request bodies read through the gateway's own detail API, tallies only): 541 of 541 no-reasoning rows that kept a body carry reasoning.effort=max; 77 kept no body. The executor applies the effort on both the native and the translated path (open-sse/executors/codex.ts L1425-1464).
What came back (probes/codex-effort-coverage-20260927.json, 12:00–20:00Z, codex/gpt-6-astra on /v1/responses): 617 turns returned 0 reasoning tokens and 3,825 reasoned. The zero-reasoning turns are full task turns (median input 28k tokens, median output 190), concentrated on first and spawn_agent turns. A -max request shows the same.
Consequence: this is upstream behaviour at max, not a transport defect, so the gateway has nothing to fix. Top action 2, the limitation, the verdict text, build_verdict.py.txt and the README now say this.

token-save-practice-gpt6 confirmed the column semantics from the installed source and retracted the claim to the other lanes. Its lane PR records the anti-pattern: acceptance must not rely on blank effort columns.

scripts/validate.py and evidence_manifest.py --check pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…PT-6 cross-family refutation; qmd scope and embeddings evidence - docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-feature-resolution.md: 32 hold, 7 enabled and verified, 9 per-lane after an A/B, 7 not applicable. Every compression engine and guard is hold at this pin (lossy for Codex/extraction content, and no per-lane opt-in exists: exclusions beat headers and CX/FW share codex/*). The legacy semantic cache is armed with no global switch. Measured today: FW calls without effort run at medium; -max gives max, also with tools; json_object and strict json_schema need client-side fixes through the gateway. Research verdict only; gateway enactment stays with its owner. - evidence/artifacts/omniroute-features-20260927/: the Claude and GPT-6 dives, every GPT-6 refutation, the deterministic merge (final verdict), per-job GPT-6 usage, the failed first attempt's Claude usage, probes, redacted live reads, prompts, schemas and scripts. - evidence/artifacts/qmd-scope-embed-20260927/: the named catalog index gained vectors and the adoption/ and docs/ collections; E1's scope failure and a frozen 10-query A/B (hybrid 10/10 hit@5, vector 9/10, raw-question lexical 1/10). - docs/foundation-stack.md points at the new record; the account-pool record notes that #14866 closed at 08:46:47Z. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

… review of #423) - States are recommended dispositions. The record now separates observed state: UNIVERSAL_CONTEXT_HANDOFF_ENABLED and OMNIROUTE_EMERGENCY_FALLBACK are on by default, inert today, and turning them off is a new top action. - The verdict carries each refutation's material findings (refutation_findings, 38 features), which override the proposal's descriptive text where they conflict. - Session affinity corrected: without a header the key falls back to body ids, prompt_cache_key, then a first-input hash (sessionAffinityPin.ts L197-221); session_tag is a tracked conversation id (conversationTracker.ts), not per request. - The categorical "no per-lane opt-in" is narrowed. Exact-model exclusions leave suffixed variants eligible (exclusions.ts L50-70): an untested selector. - Retained the observations that were only quoted: the effort read-back, account-spread counts, probe returns (as .json; *.jsonl is ignored), the cognee structured-output receipt, tool counts, synth-r1 error events, the #14866 closure and the qmd model identity. - machineId masked in the snapshot and in the sanitizer; the lite.ts path, compression counts, preamble condition and combo effort tier corrected; qmd medians recomputed as true medians (7.8 s, 119.65 s); a known model-count error annotated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…measurement Top action 2 said Codex CLI lanes already pass model_reasoning_effort=max and logged max/max. A read-only call_logs measurement on the shared gateway (12:00-20:00Z) disproves it for part of their traffic: - 616 codex/gpt-6-astra /v1/responses rows carried no effort, each with 0 reasoning tokens; 3,809 ran at max/max. - The no-effort rows are full task turns: median input 28k tokens. - Per gateway conversation: 72 start with one no-effort row, 89 mix them in otherwise, and 94 multi-row conversations are all max. token-save-practice-gpt6's row-by-row rollout matching found the first request of a codex exec session and spawn_agent requests without effort. Changes: - Codex lanes also use the -max suffix. - New limitation: some turns of this run's own GPT-6 jobs may have run without reasoning. - The verdict and the merge script carry the same corrected text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

… some turns return no reasoning The previous correction read call_logs' blank effort columns as missing effort. call_logs fills reasoning_effort_requested and reasoning_effort_upstream only when the response carries encrypted reasoning (src/lib/usage/callLogs.ts L646-653). The stored request bodies, read through the gateway's own detail API, show reasoning.effort=max on 541 of 541 no-reasoning rows that kept a body. So Codex CLI lanes do send max. 617 of their turns in 12:00-20:00Z returned 0 reasoning tokens, against 3,825 that reasoned. That is upstream behaviour at max, not transport; a -max request shows the same. Changes: - Top action 2, the limitation, the verdict text, the merge script and the README say this. - New probes/codex-sent-effort-20260927.json with its script. - The coverage capture now states the column semantics. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Of the 617 zero-reasoning turns, 464 completed; 148 were client-closed (499) and 5 failed upstream (502/503). All 3,825 reasoning turns completed. So 464 of 4,289 successful turns (10.8%) returned no reasoning. Split from the retained probe's size_profile, raised by token-efficiency-evidence-cards. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…n and qmd scope evidence The earlier registration commits conflicted with main in manifests/evidence.json only; each was resolved to main's side and all 101 files this PR changes are registered again with host_receipts.register_file. No content change: the records still describe the 2026-09-27 builds (a58000c7 + #14904 + #13788, dd6e9607e); a 2026-09-29 delta re-verification against the rebuilt gateways (81c9b6da) follows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

… effort and enforcement point Consolidates the routing rules of the workflows README (dispatch by role, Sonnet 5.5 fan-out units, role routing), the model-currency record, the Sonnet 5.5 dispatch record and the max-default effort record into one table, and names where each route is enforced today: agent frontmatter, workflow stage, CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, client settings, Codex config, lane code or instruction only. No route changes. States that no automatic router exists; OmniRoute D04 singleton combos, D06 lane aliases and the task-aware router (D11) stay off until the promptfoo A/B of wave unit D3. gpt-6.1-sol is listed only as pending unit D4 qualification. Open PRs #423 and #508 are cited at their head commits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…s; task-to-model routing record (unit A4) (#540) * Codex user template: standing rule clauses, skills, models, routing and token lanes Adds the 2026-09-30 standing clauses to the top-rule block of adoption/templates/codex.AGENTS.template.md: skill discovery (search-first, find-skills, skill-creator; implicit invocation from a skill's description and explicit $skill-name, per openai/codex rust-v0.159.2 codex-rs/ext/skills/src/catalog_prompt.rs:8), upstream A/B and E2E harnesses, the completeness critic feeding the next landscape sweep, the north-star direction, GPT-6 model routing through the OmniRoute gateway (codex -p omniroute), dated decision records, the startup rule, and a token-lanes line naming each MCP server the Codex config template registers. The RTK upstream text and the exceptions block stay byte-identical, so the F4 block in every Codex role is unchanged. The top-rule pin is re-derived with template_segments(): 455 words, 7b41478f...; a new test requires a lane for every server in codex.config.template.toml and the standing phrases. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Portable Claude template: superset of the user-level rules plus the standing clauses examples/claude-native/CLAUDE.md becomes the single managed source of the operator's user-level file. Step 1 of the top rule takes the user-level paragraph (research and record, reference implementations, popularity guides discovery) and the skill-discovery clause (search-first, find-skills with `npx skills find`, skill-creator); the core rule takes the rules only the user-level file held (short plan, pins and reasons, relevant layers, reviewer agreement is not proof), the north-star direction, the upstream A/B and E2E harnesses and the completeness critic; token practice takes the startup rule; the worker section takes GPT-6 routing through the OmniRoute gateway. Every worker, model, Ultracode and agent-team rule is kept word for word. PortableTopRuleTests gains a phrase check for the clauses and the user-level rules (it failed on the unedited template with 29 phrases missing, 8 of them rules the user-level file held) and re-baselines the word budget to 1,656. @RTK.md stays the host's own import (recipes/claude-native-profile.md:134). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Decision record: standing rule text in every instruction layer; divergence log row docs/decisions/2026-09-30-rule-text-every-layer.md supersedes the 2026-09-28 top-rule record's "the operator's user-level file is the operator's own" at the user's 2026-09-30 request: the portable template becomes the single managed source of that file. It maps the six clauses to each surface, records the alternatives (a UserPromptSubmit carrier, per the hooks reference, adds its context beside every prompt; leaving the file unmanaged produced the divergence; per-agent copies are unit F2's; pointers measured as the fallback), the o200k sizes from token_manifest.count_files, the overrun of the unit's 200-token budget with its floor and fallback, and the overturn conditions. docs/harness-defaults.md logs the host/template divergence, naming only the check seen failing on it (the new PortableTopRuleTests phrase check). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * AGENTS.md: the six standing clauses on the four named lines; re-register hashes Hot files last (docs/lanes.md hot-file protocol). AGENTS.md takes the standing clauses by amending, not appending, the lines the brief names: - line 3, the top rule: skill discovery (search-first, find-skills with `npx skills find`, skill-creator; manifest skills model-invocable in both clients) replaces "with the installed research and skill-discovery skills", and A/B and E2E on upstream harnesses, never a self-written runner; - line 7: the north-star R&D direction; each unit names its action; - line 18: the completeness critic feeding the layer's next landscape sweep; - line 28: GPT-6 through the OmniRoute gateway (astra max, sol medium, 6.1 sol pending qualification), Codex CLI as the second native client, and "no audits, trials or network at startup" with the daily currency timer's due-file line (record lands with unit A2) replacing "Do not rerun the full audit or model trials at startup". manifests/evidence.json re-registers the six changed files already listed, with scripts/host_receipts.py register_file; component_matrix and new_host_grand_list --check pass unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Rule-text record and log row: nine user-level rules, not eight The phrase check's committed form (with "from the selected source revision", the user-level file's own wording) finds 29 phrases missing from the unedited template, 9 of them held only by the user-level file; the record, its Checks section and the anti-pattern row said 8 (from a run before that phrase changed). The record also states the two non-verbatim worker lines exactly: "Quality comes first" is one line with an identical word sequence, and the sizing line keeps every user-level word and adds "to its task". Re-registers docs/harness-defaults.md (hot file, last commit). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Codex user template: Sol-primary routing and skill matching folded into the standing lines Folds the two lines the main checkout's uncommitted changes added inside the top-rule block (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established), merged with this unit's lines instead of carried beside them: - the Models line now states the Sol-primary routing of docs/decisions/2026-09-30-sol-primary-quality-defaults.md (gpt-6.1-sol at ultra for coordination and at max for workers, gpt-6-astra at max after the recorded escalation triggers), replacing the superseded astra/sol-medium wording and "gpt-6.1-sol waits for qualification"; the OmniRoute gateway clause stays; - the skills line takes the skill-matching rule (read each selected SKILL.md, follow its native workflow, load references only when needed) next to implicit and $skill-name invocation. The phrase test failed first on the unedited block with five phrases missing (exit 1). Pin re-derived with template_segments(): 496 words, 2d3107a2...; the RTK text and exceptions block are unchanged (test_codex_agents 18 OK). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Portable Claude template: Sol-primary Codex routing; skill matching kept inside "Keep context small" - The GPT-6 bullet follows docs/decisions/2026-09-30-sol-primary-quality-defaults.md: Codex CLI is the second native client, gpt-6.1-sol at ultra coordinates and at max runs workers, gpt-6-astra at max takes the recorded escalation triggers; cross-family research, review and sweep votes run through the OmniRoute gateway. It replaces the superseded astra/sol-medium wording and "gpt-6.1-sol pending qualification". - Folds the skill-matching wording of the main checkout's uncommitted change (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established) into the token-practice bullet. The change as observed replaced "Keep context small", a rule the operator's user-level file holds; the merged bullet keeps both. The phrase check failed first on the unedited template with four phrases missing (exit 1); it now also requires "Keep context small", which the observed version lacks (mutant check: 31 phrases missing there, that one included). Word baseline 1,656 -> 1,680. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * AGENTS.md: fold the skill-lifecycle and Codex-defaults bullets; one model-routing sentence set Folds the two bullets of the main checkout's uncommitted AGENTS.md change (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established). Neither was on origin/main at 11227bf (the file's blob there equals e45328d's) nor on any other unit branch: - the token-practice bullet on matching skill descriptions, reading each selected SKILL.md and adoption/skills/lifecycle.md (which unit F3 adds); - the Codex defaults bullet (gpt-6.1-sol / ultra coordinator, gpt-6.1-sol / max primary workers, Astra/max on the recorded triggers, the Sol-primary record that unit D4 adds), merged with this unit's clause: Codex CLI is the second native client, and cross-family research, review and sweep votes run through the OmniRoute gateway. The startup bullet keeps only the startup clause, so the model routing is stated once. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Convergence guide and token handbook: Ultracode decoupled from effort; Sol worker command Folds the true delta of two files from the main checkout's uncommitted changes (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established), taken as a three-way merge onto origin/main so main's own later edits stay: - docs/convergence-architecture.md: Claude Code 2.1.284 decoupled Ultracode from effort; xhigh (saved fallback) and max (launcher) are separate choices, not measured quality gains. Source: the tagged anthropics/claude-code v2.1.285 CHANGELOG.md line 206 ("it no longer forces xhigh effort and stays on at any effort level", under 2.1.284), read 2026-09-30. - docs/token-session-handbook.md: the Codex worker command names gpt-6.1-sol, matching the stack-worker profile and recipe that unit D4 changes in the same batch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Anti-pattern log: ten folded rows and six Codex runtime lane rows Ten rows are folded byte-for-byte from the main checkout's uncommitted docs/harness-defaults.md (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established), at the top of the table where that change placed them. Only the true delta against origin/main is taken: main's newer login-shell row and the four terminal-lane rows of #532 stay; the "Sol-primary quality defaults" paragraph belongs to unit D4. Six rows were requested by the Codex runtime lane (relays codex-runtime-anti-pattern-owner-handoff-20260930 and codex-f1-source-correction-handoff-20260930), one mistake / correction / check each, citing that lane's published sources at full SHAs: PR #535 head 00aa6c2 (the cited files are byte-identical to the earlier head 6a7b164, which no remote ref holds any more), SDK branch head 404b821 and OpenHands software-agent-sdk dcf401af build.py lines 581 and 925. The GitHub Actions job conclusions the rows cite were re-read through the REST jobs API on 2026-09-30 (run 36695388851: jobs 109821999811 and 109821999568 cancelled, all steps success; run 36690153586: job 109805172026 validate-macos failure). UpstreamVerificationSectionTests: 3 OK. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fold the 2026-09-30 native practice finalization record, attributed docs/decisions/2026-09-30-sota-native-finalization.md is folded unchanged from a read-only snapshot of the main checkout (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established; tracked diff sha256 314bd1b260da0939). One attribution paragraph after the title states that provenance and which linked evidence is not published with it: evidence/artifacts/sota-finalization-20260930/ has no assigned owner, the native-skill-finalization artifacts land with unit F3 and the codex-01592-qualification artifacts wait on unit D4. The body is byte-identical to the snapshot (12,956 bytes); the privacy scan found no host path, home directory or host user name in it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Rule-text record: rebuilt base, Sol-primary clause (a), folded items, lane rows and guards, re-measured sizes - Base moves to origin/main@11227bfd (the three surfaces are byte-identical to e45328d's). - Clause (a) follows docs/decisions/2026-09-30-sol-primary-quality-defaults.md (unit D4); the brief's first wording and its 04:35Z "Astra at ultra for complex workflow tasks" relay are recorded as superseded by that later, more specific user selection. - Lists every item folded from the main checkout with the provenance sentence, the snapshot hashes, the three-way-merge method and what was not folded (recipes/README.md is on D4's branch; the finalization evidence directory has no owner). - Records the six Codex runtime lane rows (relays and what was verified) and the three relayed guards: #543 not described as published without a native gh lookup that exits 0, the 07:34Z/06:46Z actor unknown, a historical OSV pass not current after #546. - Sizes re-measured with tools/token-report/token_manifest.py count_files (gpt-tokenizer 4.0.0): AGENTS.md +323, portable template +363 (sum +686 against the 200 budget: +139 folded text, +547 clauses and user-level rules), Codex template +507. - Limitations updated: clause (c) against F3's settings, cross-unit references, unpublished evidence, older Codex pins, A3's scaffold copy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Codex routing on all three surfaces: Astra/Ultra coordinates a complex workflow, Astra/Max takes a single consequential judgment Follows the coordinator's decision and unit D4's refined Sol-primary record (claude/sota-defaults-d4-codex-0159-20260930 at 9dd4ebe), which splits the escalation by the Codex catalog semantics it documents (Ultra: proactive delegation with the model's xhigh reasoning; Max: the highest reasoning effort) and quotes the user's 2026-09-30 selection ("astra ultra when tasks needed suitable for complex workflow"): - gpt-6-astra at ultra when a complex workflow needs Astra to coordinate it; - gpt-6-astra at max for a single consequential judgment (conflicting primary evidence, consequential architecture, complex changes across systems, or a failure unresolved after one bounded Sol repair). AGENTS.md's folded Codex bullet, the portable template's Codex bullet and the Codex block's Models line now state the split. Both phrase checks failed first with four phrases missing each (exit 1). Codex pin re-derived with template_segments(): 515 words, d1195686...; portable word baseline 1,697. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * One-pass tightening of the added rule text (no rule removed) The coordinator accepted the growth over the 200-token budget and asked for one pass that cuts words carrying no rule, limited to text this branch adds: - AGENTS.md Codex bullet: the Astra split as two clauses and the contract pointer in parentheses (2,742 -> 2,733 o200k tokens); - portable template: "(registry: `npx skills find`)" -> "(`npx skills find`)" (2,436 -> 2,433); - Codex block: implicit/explicit invocation in one clause, "use the `search-first` skill" -> "use `search-first`", the registry label, and "the paired benchmark of Claude's `skill-creator` plugin" -> "Claude's `skill-creator` paired benchmark" (1,360 -> 1,346). Every phrase of both phrase checks still holds. Codex pin re-derived with template_segments(): 507 words, 97bbeb8c...; portable word baseline 1,696. Counts: tools/token-report/token_manifest.py count_files, gpt-tokenizer 4.0.0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fold the finalization record's evidence: 18 of the 19 files of evidence/artifacts/sota-finalization-20260930/, unchanged Allowed-path amendment by the coordinator. The files are copied byte-for-byte from the read-only snapshot r2 of the main checkout (pre-existing uncommitted changes observed in the main checkout; original author not established); sha256sum -c against the snapshot passes. Sanitization: nothing needed stripping and no file was changed. - validate.py --scan-file over all 19 snapshot files: {"scanned_files": 19, "status": "passed"} (UUID, personal home path, Windows user path and token patterns). - A wider scan found no personal home path, host user name, /tmp/claude-* path, session UUID, e-mail, IP address or token. The one "/home/" string earlier reported as a home path is the literal placeholder "/home/example" inside claude-review.json's prose, which validate.py's pattern exempts. Replacing it with <home> would alter the retained review without removing any host data, and would break the sha256 pin that the lane's convergence record holds for that file, so the file stays byte-exact. The config-key hits in convergence.json are recorded codex exec command lines already redacted to <private-path>; the three "~/." strings are generic install locations. Held back: convergence.json. It is a kind "convergence_experiment" record whose frozen inputs and observations pin five files of native-skill-finalization-20260930 (unit F3; all five pins match F3's branch) and three of codex-01592-qualification-20260930 (on no branch yet) by path and sha256. validate_convergence.py --all-recorded, which CI runs, fails discovery for an undeclared hash-listed record and fails validation for a declared one with missing files, so it can be folded, declared in convergence_records, only after F3 lands and D4 publishes those three files unchanged at those paths. The folded record's attribution paragraph says so; its links and the four folded log rows into this directory resolve. Hash registration follows in the last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Rule-text record: Ultra/Max split, accepted budget miss with its overturn condition, evidence fold and sanitization, post-A3 step - Base is origin/main@8fc86119 (rule surfaces byte-identical to 11227bf and e45328d). - Clause (a) records the split from unit D4's refined record (9dd4ebe): gpt-6-astra at ultra when a complex workflow needs Astra to coordinate it, at max for a single consequential judgment, with the catalog semantics and the user's 2026-09-30 words as relayed. - Measured size: AGENTS.md 2,392 -> 2,733 (+341), portable template 2,051 -> 2,433 (+382), Codex block 829 -> 1,346 (+517); budget sum +723 against 200, accepted by the coordinator because the clauses are the user's explicit directive. Composition: fold +139, split +49, tightening -12. Overturn condition: a rerun of the 2026-09-29 user-prefix A/B showing no rule-following gain for the added cost brings back the pointer fallback. - The finalization record's evidence: 18 of 19 files folded unchanged; the sanitization section gives the scan and corrects the first handoff (19 files, not 21; the one "/home/" string is the /home/example placeholder, kept byte-exact, also because the lane's convergence record pins its sha256). convergence.json is held back: a convergence_experiment record pinning F3 and D4 files that CI's validate_convergence --all-recorded would reject on this branch whether declared or not. - Known residual links: seven targets, four from F3 and three from D4 (the Sol-primary record and two codex-01592-qualification files). - Post-A3 step: after #545 merges, whichever lands second copies the top-rule block into adoption/scaffold/AGENTS.md; not created here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Rule text: conditional skill discovery on the three surfaces; the growth waiver and the provenance wording cited to the brief's amendments find-skills (npx skills find) runs only when no listed skill fits the task, so a measured child with a fitting listed skill makes no extra Skill or Bash call (the Gate A owner's note); search-first stays before custom code or a tool choice. The record cites the coordinator's dated brief amendments for the accepted +723 o200k growth and for the neutral fold provenance (a process census of file writes does not establish authorship; the Codex runtime lane asked for the wording). Codex top-rule pin re-derived: 514 words, fecf92dc...; portable baseline 1,703 words. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Standing rule text: one wording on the three surfaces, coordinator-scoped (Gate A owner's review of #557) Applies DECISION 2 of the Gate A owner's ACCEPT-WITH-CHANGES review on AGENTS.md, examples/claude-native/CLAUDE.md and the Codex block, with the same sentences on all three (the Codex block names a bounded worker where the Claude surfaces name a delegated child in the skill sentence): (a) "A coordinator, not a delegated child, invokes `search-first` before custom code or a tool choice; when no listed skill fits the task, it discovers one with `find-skills` and verifies or A/B-tests it with `skill-creator`." (b) Sol/Astra routing kept for unpinned work; added: where a launch pins the model and effort (`-m`, `-c model_reasoning_effort`), children inherit that pin and a spawn call names neither; a coordinator, never a delegated child, starts a cross-family lane. (c) Dropped "every manifest skill stays listed for model invocation in both clients" (false at this head: find-skills, grill-me and improve-codebase-architecture are user-invocable-only, find-skills has codex_enabled false) and the bare `npx skills find`. (d) The north-star, completeness-critic, trigger/acceptance and dated decision-record imperatives are a coordinator's. (f) AGENTS.md's lifecycle pointer says "(lands with unit F3)"; the currency-notice (A2, in the stack below) and Sol-primary (D4, on main) citations stay. The harness and startup sentences take one wording too. Post-A3 step done: adoption/scaffold/AGENTS.md carries the final top-rule block byte for byte (tests.test_scaffold_repo passes). Tests: StandingRuleSurfacesTests (new) asserts the shared sentences on all three surfaces and the dropped clause on none; it failed first with 21 failing subtests (exit 1). Both phrase lists failed first (exit 1). Codex pin re-derived with template_segments(): 538 words by Python str.split(), 9565217f...; portable baseline 1,750; comments now name str.split(), not wc -w (review point (e)). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Token handbook: the Sol worker command is marked "after D4"; the sealed E2E route keeps gpt-6-astra at max Review point (g) of the Gate A owner: the sealed Gate A E2E runbook launches Codex workers with `-m gpt-6-astra -c model_reasoning_effort="max"` (evidence/artifacts/token-adoption-e2e-20260926/RUNBOOK.md:371; README.md:266), so the handbook's `-m gpt-6.1-sol` command is marked as the post-D4 default and names the sealed route beside it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Rule-text record: the Gate A owner's decisions (window-W guard, coordinator scoping), corrections, sources and numbers at final content - DECISION 1 (record only): B1 applies neither user-level template; ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md (managed block) and ~/.codex/AGENTS.md stay byte-identical until the last Gate A window closes, F1's templates apply after window W. Why: the Codex block's line 16 names seven lane tools and every Codex arm reads the global AGENTS.md; the sealed design appends no LANES block (E2E README:188) and arm N is "config-free, not guidance-free" (README:275); Amendment 4 seals the pre-change hashes of both files. The guard covers window W only. - DECISION 2: one wording on the three surfaces, coordinator-scoped imperatives, the pinned-launch rule (seed-binding-4, E2E README:157), the dropped "every manifest skill ..." clause (false at head) and why. - Corrects the previous "makes no extra call" claim: the conditional wording gated only find-skills; search-first stayed ungated. - Sources (point (f)): the pinned discovery command (skills-1.7.0 `skills find` with DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1, skills-agents-layer README:90, adoption/skills/manifest.json:22); the completeness critic cites Anthropic's evaluator-optimizer workflow and the multi-agent research system's completeness criterion; the north-star clause records "no upstream source; checked both pages, 2026-09-30". - Numbers at final content (token_manifest count_files, gpt-tokenizer 4.0.0, base main 1f2cdce): AGENTS.md 2,392 -> 2,812 (+420), portable 2,051 -> 2,506 (+455), sum +875 against 200 (+723 accepted by the coordinator; +152 is the review's required text); Codex block 829 -> 1,397 (+568); scaffold 373 -> 941. Words are Python str.split() counts. - Post-A3 step marked done; six residual links listed (four F3, two D4). docs/harness-defaults.md logs the proven mistake the review found: stating a rule or a measurement for the head from an earlier state. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Rule-text record: attribute the Amendment 4 seal to the Gate A owner's review The amendment text is not in this repository, so the record states the seal on the two user-level files' pre-change hashes as the review's statement, not as a fact verified here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Task-to-model routing record: one table of task class, client, model, effort and enforcement point Consolidates the routing rules of the workflows README (dispatch by role, Sonnet 5.5 fan-out units, role routing), the model-currency record, the Sonnet 5.5 dispatch record and the max-default effort record into one table, and names where each route is enforced today: agent frontmatter, workflow stage, CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, client settings, Codex config, lane code or instruction only. No route changes. States that no automatic router exists; OmniRoute D04 singleton combos, D06 lane aliases and the task-aware router (D11) stay off until the promptfoo A/B of wave unit D3. gpt-6.1-sol is listed only as pending unit D4 qualification. Open PRs #423 and #508 are cited at their head commits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * token-practice: point to the task-to-model routing record Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Test the routing record against the enforcement points it quotes Every value the record's table quotes from a file must still be on the cited lines, every cited line must exist, frontmatter rows must name the model they quote, every task class must have a row, gpt-6.1-sol must stay listed only as pending and routed nowhere, and docs/token-practice.md must point to the record. Integration checks of the repository's own record, not upstream acceptance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record: name the client's content-based fallback guards "No automatic router exists" now also names Claude Code's own content-based fallback and the two keys that switch it off in the project settings and the user-settings template (switchModelsOnFlag false, CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_REFUSAL_FALLBACK=1), with the model-currency addendum's note that their coverage is unverified and that availability fallback chains are a separate mechanism. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record: cite #508 line 90 alone for the run-shape levers #508's token-stack record says the run-shape levers, role dispatch among them, are "owned by the Gate A owner after #381 closes" (line 90). Its line 93 ("Gate A per-row results decide any change") is about the on-demand members of line 92, not the levers, so the Context paragraph and the Sources entry now cite line 90 only (review finding, low). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record and test: hold quoted values per file, not per line; Codex rows name no version Six sibling units of this wave may edit files that the record quotes by line: landscape-sweep (A1), bootstrap-linux.sh (A3), .claude/agents and the settings template's hooks entry (F2), the settings template and the Codex template (F3), codex_roles.py (F4) and the model-currency record (D4, an addendum over the region of its line 284). None of them may edit this record or its test. An exact-line check fails their pull requests on any inserted line, even when no route changes. - The record now states every line number as read at e45328d. tests/test_task_model_routing.py counts each quoted value in its whole file and requires at least one copy for each distinct line quoted, so a pure line shift passes and a changed model or effort fails. - Two values have more copies than the record cited. It now also cites the template's modelSettings xhigh for claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5 (:303, :306) and review-changes.js's recheck-stage scout binding (:78), so a change to any cited copy fails. - model-currency.md:284 is cited without a CI-checked quote. D4 may rewrite that sentence. - The Codex rows' Client cell says "Codex CLI". The preamble records that manifests/stack.json:297 pins 0.157.1 at e45328d, so D4's pin move leaves no stale version string (review finding, low). - The GPT-6.1 check matches a model binding (a model key or constant, or -m/--model with an optional gateway prefix), not any mention. F1 may write prose naming gpt-6.1-sol into adoption/templates; a real binding, such as D4 switching the Codex template default, still fails. Controls, each run in a fresh copy of the files the test reads: 16 of 16 as expected for both the old and the new test. Pure line shifts (codex template, model-currency.md, sweep.js) and an F1-style prose mention fail the old test and pass the new one. Changed frontmatter, one of two identical sweep bindings, and a gpt-6.1-sol template default fail both. Changing the :306 per-model xhigh or the :78 recheck binding passes the old test and fails the new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * token-efficiency profile: accept the selection, carry the three code-navigation tools The profile's label drops "Drafted, not accepted" for a dated acceptance of the selection, citing the routing record, which joins recipe_paths so the profile resolves only while the record is present. jcodemunch-mcp, codebase-memory-mcp and ast-grep join component_ids and required_commands: the SubagentStart carrier names them as task-appended lanes and the code-navigation layer's current choice names all three (catalogs/landscape/foundation.json). Their versions stay in manifests/stack.json (1.108.319, 0.11.0, 0.45.3); a manifest profile has five keys and carries no version or wiring field, so neither is added. tests/test_adoption_status.py restates the split the profile is checked against: NAVIGATION_CHOICE, asserted against the code-navigation current choice, leaves OPTIONAL, and the Ultracode tool split becomes 13 profile rows and 3 optional rows against 17 component_ids. Failing-first: the restated tests fail against the previous manifest (2 of 3 in TokenEfficiencyProfileTests) and the previous tests fail against this manifest (the same 2, plus ProfileTableTests.test_pin_columns_match_the_pin_files, whose adoption/README.md cells are outside this unit's paths). manifests/evidence.json is re-registered in the branch's last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record: accept the token-efficiency profile, state the three tools' wiring The record no longer says the profile is "not decided here"; it makes the claim that adoption/manifest.json now cites. The Decision gains a dated acceptance that bounds itself to the selection and its routing (structural validation, not a host's acceptance), the pin and the Claude Code and Codex wiring of jcodemunch-mcp, codebase-memory-mcp and ast-grep with the file that carries each, the basis for adding them (the SubagentStart carrier, the code-navigation current choice, the 2026-09-25 Ultracode run), and where #508 differs: it lists ast-grep as the structural-code lane, makes jCodeMunch an owner only once wired and lists codebase-memory-mcp as not a member, so the record does not rest on #508 for those two. Two alternatives (leave the three optional; a new manifest key) and two overturn conditions (#508 or Gate A changes a row; pins arrive) are added, and the Sources name the new files and #508 lines 85, 86 and 103. Every path:line cite in the whole record resolves in this branch (115 cites, 28 bare paths); the record keeps its five sections and one table, which tests/test_task_model_routing.py holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * token-efficiency-stack: restate the optional-row split for the three tools now in the profile Three statements had become false: that jCodeMunch, ast-grep and codebase-memory-mcp are optional rows outside the profile, that the profile has 14 component_ids, and that the Ultracode run's 16 tools are ten profile rows and six optional rows. The profile paragraph now lists the three as the code-navigation layer's task-selected tools (none a layer winner), the optional-row paragraph keeps Context Hub, the viewers and OmniRoute, and adds why client_wiring still checks only Serena, SocratiCode and ai-memory, that the three have no platform pin (so --pinned-versions reports them unchecked) and that a bootstrap refuses the profile until they are named in --allow-unpinned (adoption/bootstrap-linux.sh --help: exit 3). The Ultracode paragraph becomes 17 component_ids, thirteen profile rows and three optional rows, matching tests/test_adoption_status.py. The review of this unit asked for this reconciliation (docs/token-efficiency-stack.md lines 264-270); the file is outside the brief's allowed paths, so it is its own commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Test the token-efficiency profile against the routing record that accepts it The record's Decision says the profile's label accepts it and names the record, that the record is one of its recipe_paths, and that jcodemunch-mcp, codebase-memory-mcp and ast-grep are component_ids and required_commands. The new test in tests/test_task_model_routing.py holds those claims to adoption/manifest.json and requires the record to name each tool. It compares no version: manifests/stack.json owns them, and the record now dates the ones it quotes at e45328d. Failing-first: against the previous manifest the test fails on the label ('Accepted' not found in 'Drafted, not accepted: ...'); against this branch's manifest all 8 tests in the module pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * token-efficiency profile: README pin cells, regenerated grand list and re-registration (companion) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * token-efficiency profile: back to the 14 pinned components; the three code-navigation tools stay optional rows Round 1 (24c8703) added jcodemunch-mcp, codebase-memory-mcp and ast-grep to the profile's component_ids and required_commands. Neither adoption/pins-linux-x86_64.json nor adoption/pins-macos-arm64.json lists them, and both bootstraps fail closed on a selected component with no pin: adoption/bootstrap-linux.sh:169 and adoption/bootstrap-macos.sh:220 print "No pin in <file> for selected component(s)" and exit 3, and adoption/bootstrap-macos.sh:176-190 records that no component is exempted from a pin by default. PR #540's validate-macos job failed on it (3 tests of tests/test_adoption_bootstrap_macos.py TokenEfficiencyPlanTests), reproduced locally at 8ca7895 with `python3 -m unittest tests.test_adoption_bootstrap_macos tests.test_adoption_bootstrap tests.test_adoption_launchd`: FAILED (failures=3, skipped=38). The profile is again the 14 pinned components. It keeps the accepted label and the routing record in recipe_paths. The three tools stay the code-navigation layer's task-selected tools and the carrier's task-appended lanes, installed on demand from their recipes, until each has a reviewed pin on both platforms and a host receipt. tests/test_adoption_status.py returns to main's OPTIONAL set of eight and the (16, 14, 10) Ultracode split, and TokenEfficiencyProfileTests gains test_every_profile_component_has_a_pin_on_both_platforms, so a profile that outruns the pin files fails in this file's own module set and not only in the bootstrap plan tests. tests/test_task_model_routing.py holds the record's claims about the three: outside component_ids and required_commands, unpinned on both platforms, named by the code-navigation current choice and by the carrier's lane ids. Failing-first: with these tests and the round-1 manifest (17 component_ids), 4 of the 12 tests in TokenEfficiencyProfileTests and TaskModelRoutingRecordTests fail, 8 failures counting subtests ("Tuples differ: (16, 17, 13) != (16, 14, 10)", "'jcodemunch-mcp' unexpectedly found in [...]", the pin-file membership checks). With the manifest of this commit all 12 pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * token-efficiency-stack: restore the optional-row split, since the three tools are not profile members This reverts 12a587e. docs/token-efficiency-stack.md is byte-identical to origin/main (11227bf) again: the profile has 14 component_ids, jCodeMunch, ast-grep and codebase-memory-mcp are task-selected options in the code-navigation layer's current choice and stay optional rows, and the Ultracode run's 16 tools are ten profile rows and six optional rows. The statements 12a587e rewrote (three joined the profile on 2026-09-30; a bootstrap refuses the profile until they are named in --allow-unpinned; 17 component_ids, thirteen profile rows) described a profile that adoption/manifest.json no longer has, because both bootstraps fail closed on a component without a pin and none of the three has one. tests/test_adoption_status.py checks the ten/six split against the receipt's tool list. The reasoning is recorded once, in docs/decisions/2026-09-30-task-model-routing.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * adoption README: the token-efficiency row says accepted, and its cells describe the 14 pinned components again d5369cb wrote the row for 17 members: "14 of 17 (all 14 at v2026.09.26.2)" in both pin columns, the three code-navigation tools in the description, and a note that a bootstrap of the profile needs them in --allow-unpinned. The profile has its 14 pinned components again (previous commit), so the description, both pin cells and the note are main's, and only the acceptance wording stays: "Accepted 2026-09-30 as the selection", linking the routing record. The pinned release v2026.09.26.2 covers the same 14 of 14 as HEAD, so tests/test_adoption_docs_consistency.py (ProfileTableTests.cell_errors) asks for no note on that tag; the notes for v2026.09.25.2 and v2026.09.26 are checked against their own tags and hold. Failing-first: with the round-1 row and the 14-component manifest, ProfileTableTests.test_pin_columns_match_the_pin_files fails ("token-efficiency Linux pins: table says '14 of 17', adoption/pins-linux-x86_64.json gives 'all 14'"). With this row the module passes: Ran 37 tests, OK (skipped=1). The one skip is data dependent, not environmental: no profile's coverage differs between the pinned release and HEAD, on origin/main as well as here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record: the three code-navigation tools stay outside the accepted profile, for want of a pin The record accepted the token-efficiency profile and, in round 1, added jCodeMunch, codebase-memory-mcp and ast-grep to it. It now accepts the profile as it is, its 14 pinned components, and says why the three are not members: both bootstraps fail closed on a selected component with no pin (adoption/bootstrap-linux.sh:144-172, adoption/bootstrap-macos.sh:177-223, and the macOS comment at :177-187 that no component is exempted from a pin by default any more), none of the three has an entry in adoption/pins-linux-x86_64.json or adoption/pins-macos-arm64.json, and tests/test_adoption_bootstrap_macos.py:1015-1017 requires the profile's plan to resolve every component with no --allow-unpinned. - Alternatives: leaving the three out is the chosen state; adding them (round 1) is a rejected alternative with its failure (Adoption bootstrap smoke run 36728291629, job validate-macos, step "Gate on the adoption test modules"; reproduced locally at 8ca7895, failures=3) and the reason --allow-unpinned does not rescue it. - Decision: "Three tools join the profile" becomes "Three tools stay outside the profile"; the wiring bullets, which describe how each installs on demand, stay; the "14 of 17" coverage and the exit-3 sentence are gone; "Where #508 differs" becomes "#508's rows": leaving the three out agrees with #508 for jCodeMunch (line 86) and codebase-memory-mcp (line 103), and ast-grep (line 85, the structural-code lane) is out only for want of a pin. - Overturn condition: the follow-up unit that adds a tool once it has a reviewed pin on both platforms and a host receipt for each, with the files it must restate in the same change (adoption/README.md row, token-efficiency-stack.md split, OPTIONAL and CARRIER_TOOLS in the two tests). - Header and Sources: the citations are at e45328d while the branch is based on 11227bf, where examples/claude-native/workflows/README.md has grown by 249 lines; the record says so. The pin-rule files it now cites are unchanged between the two bases. tests/test_task_model_routing.py (previous commit) holds these claims to the files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Test the routing record against D4's Codex routes tests/test_task_model_routing.py predated D4 (#542, merged as 1f2cdce) and failed on the stacked tree (validate job 110072600341): two quoted `model = "gpt-6-astra"` lines and the test that expected GPT-6.1 Sol to be routed nowhere. - A quoted value counts only as a whole value, so `model = "${CODEX_MODEL}"` is not met by the template's `default_subagent_model` line. - GPT-6.1 Sol: the table's Sol rows are exactly the Sol-primary record's three routes (the Codex coordinator at ultra, primary workers and generic children at max), and every file in the routing places (now with recipes/ and adoption/agents/) that binds a GPT-6.1 model, a constant such as CODEX_MODEL_CURRENT included, is cited by a Sol row. __pycache__ and node_modules are skipped: CI flagged prove_codex_lane's bytecode. - The Codex user template is rendered through tools/adoption/render_config.py for every pinned platform, as tests/test_render_config.py's CodexModelTests do, and must give the models and efforts that the coordinator and generic-children rows name. - The task classes add complex-workflow coordination and a single consequential judgment. Fails against the record at this commit (5 failures, 1 error); the next commit restates it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record: restate the Codex rows for D4 (#542) D4 made GPT-6.1 Sol the Codex coordinator (ultra) and primary-worker model (max), with GPT-6 Astra for complex-workflow coordination (ultra) and a single consequential judgment (max): docs/decisions/2026-09-30-sol-primary-quality-defaults.md and the model-currency addendum of 2026-09-30. The record still listed Sol as pending and routed nowhere. - Six Codex rows, read at 1f2cdce: the Codex judgment role carriers (Astra, max); the coordinator and interactive default (the template's ${CODEX_MODEL} at ultra, rendered as gpt-6.1-sol for the Linux pin 0.159.2 and gpt-6-astra for the macOS pin 0.155.1); primary workers (the stack-worker profile, the lane's worker pins and live proof, the recipe's command); generic children; complex-workflow coordination and escalation (instruction only). - Context and Decision state the D4 routing and its dependence on the Codex pin. No automatic router exists, and D04/D06/D11 stay off until the D3 promptfoo A/B, as before. - Overturn: the user's next decision or D4's reopening condition, and a Codex pin crossing 0.159.1 on a platform. Sources: D4's records, the enforcement points and the CI job. The Claude rows are unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Test each GPT-6.1 binding against the Sol rows, by TOML table and command profile The GPT-6 cross-family review of round 2 (901ed76, needs_changes, medium): the "nowhere else" check compared files only, so a `[profiles.security-review]` table with `model = "gpt-6.1-sol"` added to the user template, a file the coordinator row already cites, left all nine routing tests passing. - Bindings are counted one by one: a TOML key by its table (parsed with tomllib: `model`, `agents.default_subagent_model`, `profiles.<name>.model`, on the ID or on `${CODEX_MODEL}`), a key or constant elsewhere (CODEX_MODEL_CURRENT), and a command's `-m`, named with the profile the command selects (`-p stack-worker -m`). - Each binding must be one a Sol row cites by file and name. A quoted TOML key names the one key of that name and value (a quoted `[table]` header scopes it), and a quote that fits two keys is reported. Each cited binding must be one D4 makes: the template's `model` and `[agents] default_subagent_model`, the render constant, the stack-worker profile's `model` and the stack-worker command's `-m`. - Regression: the planted profile, in memory, on the ID and on the placeholder, and then cited by its table from the coordinator row; each variant is reported. Fails against the record at this commit: the stack-worker command's `-m` in the profile's header (line 3) and in the live proof's help (tools/adoption/prove_codex_lane.py:36) are bindings no Sol row cites. The next commit cites them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Routing record: cite the stack-worker command where the profile header and the live proof write it The binding-level check of the previous commit found two GPT-6.1 bindings that the primary-worker row did not cite, both the stack-worker command's `-m`, which D4 routes: the profile's header (adoption/templates/codex.stack-worker.config.toml:3) and the live proof's help (tools/adoption/prove_codex_lane.py:36). The row now quotes both, beside the recipe's command it already quoted. No other row changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-register the changed hash-listed files in manifests/evidence.json (hot-file protocol) The last commit of the branch carries the hot files: the stacking ref's manifests/evidence.json with this branch's changed hash-listed files re-registered, and the regenerated component-evidence matrix and new-host grand list (docs/lanes.md hot-file protocol). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Scout <scout@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-03T08:21:58Z

Custody plan for #423 (Claude session native-agent-stack-0c, 2026-10-03)

No lane has claimed this draft since 2026-09-29: nothing in the coordination folder, on #608 or in repository comments from the last 24 hours. Main already cites its record and verdict at head e2e04805 (docs/decisions/2026-09-30-task-model-routing.md:305-310), so 0c plans to land it:

Merge current main into this branch, with no rebase and no force-push, so e2e04805 stays an ancestor and those links keep resolving.
Keep the record body and the 98 evidence files byte-identical. Append a dated 2026-10-03 status section that settles each remeasurement promise against the 2026-09-30 rebuild (2f42a9ac1) and the destination build (release/v3.8.52 23a11484), and names what stays open and who holds it.
Replace the in-place #14866 edits with one Update 2026-10-03 bullet in the account-pool record. Drop the docs/foundation-stack.md sentence, which the 2026-09-30 rebuild made stale.
Register manifests/evidence.json last and run the validate suite. Then an independent Opus review, before a squash merge pinned to the reviewed head.

lane:foundation. No host, gateway, trading or new-distribution file is touched. Objection window: 2 hours from this comment. If anyone objects or claims the PR here, 0c stops.

Claude session native-agent-stack-0c

…s and the stale foundation-stack pointer take main's version)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…-file protocol Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Main advanced one commit (#636: AGENTS.md and its manifests/evidence.json row) after the custody merge base 9b0b8d6. Merged, not rebased, so e2e0480 stays an ancestor. Per the hot-file protocol (docs/lanes.md:94-141) this merge takes main's manifests/evidence.json; the owned files are re-registered in the branch's last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…rt caps Applies the independent Opus review's findings to the appended section only; record lines 1-2 and 4-146 stay byte-identical to e2e0480. - Rows a, b and f: the published post_apply_checks.py is the 00:40:42Z rewrite and the 36-check version is not retained (rebuild record :172-176, :187-189), so the 20128 flags, the 20129 emergency-fallback flag and the armed exact cache at 2f42a9ac1 are inferred, not printed. 20129's flags cite the routing lane's 2026-09-28 read-back (decisions.json:136-137); the last printed cache read is the dd6e9607e route map (:159-160). - Row d: reasoningSuffix.ts is the same blob 627f2a33 at a58000c7 and at the peeled v3.8.51 commit c1e30b76, and MAX_EFFORT_BY_MODEL/clampEffort are identical, so the effort-cap trigger did not fire (contents GETs stamped 2026-10-03T12:58:08Z-12:58:11Z). - Row e: D03 is not on unit D3's A/B (task-model-routing.md:95); it joins the open-with-the-consuming-lane list, with the routing adjudication's P4 hold. - Account-pool update: the #14866 quote keeps its code span, byte-exact to the retained artifact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Hot-file protocol (docs/lanes.md:94-141), last commit: manifests/evidence.json is main's copy at 4ced292 with the two decision records and the 98 preserved evidence files re-registered through host_receipts.register_file (99 rows added, the account-pool row changed; receipts[] and convergence_records[] unchanged). component_matrix.py --write and new_host_grand_list.py --write left the four generated reports byte-identical; validate.py passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-03T19:51:23Z

Exact-head FINDINGS at 7128ad88666963478152a91dba76bd090cc2e666: bounded publication source reviewed; whole feature/default acceptance withheld. PR423 remains DRAFT. No previous blanket root acceptance was found in the searched complete PR comments and selected retained CODEX files.

Eight of 101 current contexts were read in full and independently Git-verified: two decision documents, two READMEs, interim/final verdicts, the verdict builder and registry. The dated appendix distinguishes owner-reported configuration from unresolved routing/quality qualification. Its source publication supplies no new native authentication, provider attempt, measured outcome or whole-architecture/default acceptance.

All 98 historical evidence Git identities remain exact to original e2e048053b151ac9c2ba269864cb4adf035058d3; 93 artifact bodies were not opened in this read. Identity preservation does not substitute for their content review or authenticate historical private originals. This coverage limit prevents a blanket implementation/feature verdict; the explicit appendix scope and historical attribution remain the available source finding.

The source integration gap is separately cleared for the exact pair. Native prospective Git merge against main 1f5a791b02a230aced670c88bab3d3d0ebcf401a returned 0, tree c8ef0139c514bde5a370fe411b70f42ebaa7c55e. Root derived complete original tree/registry projections: every foreign mode/OID and registry row/order, all 193 receipts, 29 convergence records, metadata and #640 dashboard carry exactly; all 100 owned payload identities and registrations survive. This does not expand the eight-context semantic read. Current CI, ownership and later main/head remain separate.

Source packet manifest SHA256 db4f86b3cefae7bccecf7445c9554817d4b86694bea7dcb977d71cc5c6d91fd9 (50 native0); prospective packet 5d2c9a4244e0ec2c227ce343e6e3cd90a189464ff7a465b226ad38197483b0eb (43 native0, three help129). All source/capture bindings used here were independently verified. No implementation fix, test, model/provider, account, route or credential operation was performed.

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-07T04:23:27Z

Closed with a record by the PR triage of 2026-10-07 (the command center's ruling, item review-ns2604-coop-20261007T023012Z (the command center's PR-triage ruling of 2026-10-07; proposal by github-ci-finalize, triage-20261007.json)). Not merged; the branch claude/omniroute-feature-resolution-20260927 stays on origin at 7128ad8.

What it holds: docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-feature-resolution.md; docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-account-pool.md (modified); evidence/artifacts/omniroute-features-20260927/ (71 files); evidence/artifacts/qmd-scope-embed-20260927/ (27 files)

Superseded by: Overtaken by the 2026-09-30 OmniRoute rebuild b4056a3 (#530): the PR's own status row says its C00-C20 compression holds were superseded by the user-directed 2026-09-30 rebuild on 20129 (7128ad8:docs/decisions/2026-09-27-omniroute-feature-resolution.md:156; docs/decisions/2026-09-30-omniroute-rebuild.md:1). The build it reviewed was replaced; the composition of record is 424b8a7 (#744, docs/decisions/2026-10-05-omniroute-gateway-composition.md:1). Its qmd-scope half landed as 6ac2b60 (#417). (confidence: medium: the flag and cache rows stay open with the destination gateway's owner; main still cites #423 at docs/decisions/2026-09-30-task-model-routing.md:30,305-309)

Reopen trigger: A NativeStack gateway is re-pinned (the first official release carrying #15167), or enabling compression, cache or routing features is proposed; the per-feature dispositions are then re-run at that build from this verdict's open rows. Reopen with gh pr reopen 423.

seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:foundation Foundation lane: Claude/Codex setup, hosts, memory, RAG, research, workers label Sep 27, 2026

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2026

GitHub practice: document the --match-head-commit merge guard; re-require sota-sources #430

Merged

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2026

Gateway A/B R02 preregistration draft: FW effort medium vs max on li26 (not frozen, not run) #445

Closed

4 tasks done

Scout and others added 6 commits September 28, 2026 22:00

seathatflowsinourveins marked this pull request as draft September 29, 2026 02:02

seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the claude/omniroute-feature-resolution-20260927 branch from 95be2d0 to e2e0480 Compare September 29, 2026 02:02

This was referenced Sep 29, 2026

AGENTS.md: embed after qmd update, and name the foundation-adoption and foundation-docs collections #417

Merged

Token-efficiency profile accepted with the three code-navigation tools; task-to-model routing record (unit A4) #540

Merged

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2026

Client configuration for the new distribution: wire only what the definitive manifest installs (map, tool, F9) #608

Merged

5 tasks done

Scout and others added 3 commits October 3, 2026 06:30

Merge origin/main 9b0b8d6 into #423 for the custody landing (hot file…

7e22f14

…s and the stale foundation-stack pointer take main's version)

Settle PR #423 remeasurement promises in a dated October 3 status

a60d8c1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Register PR #423 dated records and preserved evidence through the hot…

81f3bcf

…-file protocol Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins changed the title ~~OmniRoute feature resolution: all 55 gateway features resolved with GPT-6 cross-family refutation; qmd scope and embeddings evidence~~ Preserve OmniRoute feature research and settle October 3 remeasurement promises Oct 3, 2026

Scout and others added 2 commits October 3, 2026 09:05

Scout and others added 2 commits October 3, 2026 09:09

Merge main d2fc380 for the custody merge (hot-file protocol: main's r…

7128ad8

…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2026

[mac-coordinator] memory E2E: clean agentmemory 0.9.29 beside ai-memory, C4/D2h arms and token-efficiency measurement #384

Open

2 tasks done

seathatflowsinourveins closed this Oct 7, 2026

seathatflowsinourveins deleted the claude/omniroute-feature-resolution-20260927 branch October 8, 2026 17:05

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Preserve OmniRoute feature research and settle October 3 remeasurement promises - #423

Preserve OmniRoute feature research and settle October 3 remeasurement promises#423
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
claude/omniroute-feature-resolution-20260927

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 3, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 3, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Scope

SOTA sources

Evidence-class table

Local commands run

Checks

Review round

Decision record

Host evidence

Checklist

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 3, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 3, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading