Repository navigation
macOS arm64 SYN evidence for the adaptive-paper engine and mover trial mode - #176
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…l mode Record the first macOS arm64 run of the us-equities paper engine's synthetic suites with scripts/host_receipts.py (local_integration, stage use, second physical machine): Apple M5 Pro, macOS 26.5.1, hash-locked CPython 3.12.14 runtime with nautilus-trader 2.0.0rc5 and alpaca-py 0.44.0. The pinned runtime passed 732 adaptive-paper, 17 native-faults offline and 28 market-research tests (one designed skip). The mover synthetic trial and the native capacity fixture passed with zero broker connections. Artifacts: the macOS arm64 hash lock and its input (listed for OSV), the invented-ticker scan, both SYN outputs and a summary that keeps the sandboxed attempt (3 loopback-bind EPERM errors). No engine or blueprint source changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This was referenced Sep 24, 2026
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2026
…ine) On macos-m5pro-20260924, from a read-only git archive of main 6f7a77c, in the hash-locked CPython 3.12.14 runtime built from the #176 lock: - Trial a (config-sip.json, 300 s, 1x, SIP, one-share orders) passed. It made 33 submits and 3 cancel-replaces, and got 30 native fills in 15 round trips. It reconciled flat, with realized P&L of -1.51 USD. - STOP drill: the working entry was canceled 115 ms after STOP, with 0 filled, and no order followed. recover passed flat, and STOP was archived with a release record. - Native-faults harness: C01 and C02 passed with native_paper evidence. C04 and C05 are still blocked on #169. - Host receipt alpaca-py/use (native_proven, second physical machine). - Rebuilt the rate-limit evidence for the new trial headers (trading 419 to 641, data 9 to 13) and updated the pinned test totals and README row to match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2026
…ine) (#188) On macos-m5pro-20260924, from a read-only git archive of main 6f7a77c, in the hash-locked CPython 3.12.14 runtime built from the #176 lock: - Trial a (config-sip.json, 300 s, 1x, SIP, one-share orders) passed. It made 33 submits and 3 cancel-replaces, and got 30 native fills in 15 round trips. It reconciled flat, with realized P&L of -1.51 USD. - STOP drill: the working entry was canceled 115 ms after STOP, with 0 filled, and no order followed. recover passed flat, and STOP was archived with a release record. - Native-faults harness: C01 and C02 passed with native_paper evidence. C04 and C05 are still blocked on #169. - Host receipt alpaca-py/use (native_proven, second physical machine). - Rebuilt the rate-limit evidence for the new trial headers (trading 419 to 641, data 9 to 13) and updated the pinned test totals and README row to match. Co-authored-by: seathatflowsinourveins <234074349+seathatflowsinourveins@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2026
Measure the Mac first seen in #176 with scripts/hardware_profile.py --record-host (Apple M5 Pro, 18 cores, 24 GB unified memory, arm64) and record native_proven use-stage receipts for rtk 0.49.0 (rtk git status), worktrunk 0.79.0 (wt list) and gitleaks 8.30.1 (one-commit scan) with scripts/host_receipts.py record. Every command ran outside the Claude Code sandbox, in a scratch clone of main. The receipts await an independent review, and macos-arm64 stays drafted_not_accepted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
seathatflowsinourveins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2026
…runk, gitleaks (#185) * Record macos-m5pro-20260924 hardware profile and foundation use receipts Measure the Mac first seen in #176 with scripts/hardware_profile.py --record-host (Apple M5 Pro, 18 cores, 24 GB unified memory, arm64) and record native_proven use-stage receipts for rtk 0.49.0 (rtk git status), worktrunk 0.79.0 (wt list) and gitleaks 8.30.1 (one-commit scan) with scripts/host_receipts.py record. Every command ran outside the Claude Code sandbox, in a scratch clone of main. The receipts await an independent review, and macos-arm64 stays drafted_not_accepted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Regenerate evidence reports and register macos-m5pro-20260924 evidence Rerun scripts/component_matrix.py --write and scripts/new_host_grand_list.py --write for the new receipts and hardware profile. The manifests/evidence.json entries come from the recording and generation tools. Shared hot-file edits are in the last commit, following the proposed docs/lanes.md hot-file protocol (#180). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add independent reviews to the macos-m5pro-20260924 foundation receipts An independent Claude Code session (a different session identity on the same Mac) reproduced the recorded commands at bc8cee5 and appended step-8 reviews: - rtk use receipt: agree. rtk git status proxies a real command and returns compacted output. - gitleaks use receipt: agree. A real redacted scan of one commit with the repository config. - worktrunk use receipt: needs_changes. Beyond wt --version, the only command is the read-only wt list. Nothing is created, switched or removed, so the worktrees layer's job is not shown. A fresh receipt with a create/list/remove cycle in a throwaway repository with reviewed hooks addresses it. With the reviews, verdict_flip_candidates.py reports untested -> accepted support on macos-arm64 for secrets-credentials/gitleaks, security-supply-chain/gitleaks and token-efficiency/rtk. Recording the flips remains a separate record_verdicts.py step. Regenerated component-evidence-matrix and new-host-grand-list; host_receipts validate (8), validate.py, component_matrix --check (0 flip-rule violations), new_host_grand_list --check, evidence_manifest --check and validate_convergence --all-recorded pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-record macos-m5pro-20260924 worktrunk use receipt with a worktree lifecycle The independent review at cef7a74 marked the worktrunk use receipt needs_changes: it ran only wt --version and the read-only wt list. This fresh recording runs a full lifecycle in a throwaway one-commit git repository under $TMPDIR: wt switch --create wt-probe, wt list (two worktrees), wt remove --foreground wt-probe, then wt list, git worktree list, git branch --list and ls (only main left), and cleanup. All 8 commands exit 0. Worktrunk hooks were inspected first. There is no user config (~/.config/worktrunk absent: no user hooks, approvals or custom worktree-path), no system config, no WORKTRUNK_* override and no project .config/wt.toml. wt ran with stdin from /dev/null and without --yes. The recorder derives the id from host, component, stage and UTC date, so this same-day re-record replaces the file under the same id. The list-only version and its needs_changes review remain in history at cef7a74, and the new receipt says so in its limitations. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Regenerate evidence matrix and re-register the re-recorded worktrunk receipt Rerun scripts/component_matrix.py --write and scripts/new_host_grand_list.py --write (the grand list is unchanged) after the worktrunk re-record. The manifests/evidence.json hashes come from the recording and generation tools. Shared hot-file edits stay in the last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-record macos-m5pro-20260924 rtk, gitleaks and worktrunk use receipts per re-review Address the re-review of 3772eb5 (PR #185 comment 5816561592) by re-recording all three receipts in place. The recorder derives the id from host, component, stage and UTC date, so each same-day re-record reuses its id. The earlier versions and the rtk/gitleaks agree reviews remain in history at cef7a74, and each receipt's limitations say so. - All three: the install and pin sentence is now backed by retained commands. command -v <tool> is recorded with the pin source: the mise global config pin line for rtk (0.49.0) and gitleaks (8.30.1), and the host control plane's manifest.json for worktrunk (0.79.0), read through a CONTROL_PLANE_ROOT environment variable so the private path is not recorded. The limitation now reads "Supports conditional now; accepted needs an independent review." - gitleaks: add a positive control. A throwaway repository commits gitleaks' documented sidekiq-secret test fixture, built at run time from split pieces so the value never appears in the receipt. The same scan exits 1 with exactly one finding, and the wrapper asserts both. The negative controls remain: the scratch clone's latest commit and the throwaway repository's clean commit, both exit 0. - rtk: add a limitation that raw-output and failure-recovery behavior were not exercised. - worktrunk: same lifecycle probe, with the pin evidence and new wording. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Regenerate evidence reports after re-recording the macos-m5pro-20260924 receipts Rerun scripts/component_matrix.py --write and scripts/new_host_grand_list.py --write. The re-recorded receipts start without independent reviews, so the macOS state of rtk and gitleaks returns from host_verified to untested until the requested re-review. The manifests/evidence.json hashes come from the recording and generation tools. Shared hot-file edits stay in the last commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add independent agree reviews to the re-recorded macos-m5pro-20260924 receipts A separate Claude Code session on the same Mac re-reviewed the three receipts re-recorded at 19354be and reproduced every probe from its own session: - rtk: command -v with the mise pin line, rtk 0.49.0, and rtk git status compacted output. Agree. - gitleaks: command -v with the mise pin line, 8.30.1, and both negative controls (no leaks). The sidekiq-secret positive control exited 1 with exactly one finding. Agree. - worktrunk: no user, system, project or environment config, so no hooks and no --yes; the agent-ecosystem manifest pins 0.79.0; and the wt switch --create / list (2) / remove --foreground / list (1) lifecycle ran in a throwaway repository, then cleanup. Agree. The claim text is now evidence-backed, the limitation wording is corrected, and rtk's unexercised raw/failure-recovery behavior is stated. With these reviews, verdict_flip_candidates.py reports untested -> accepted support on macos-arm64 for worktrunk (git-github-automation, isolation, workers), gitleaks (secrets-credentials, security-supply-chain) and rtk (token-efficiency). Recording the flips is a separate record_verdicts.py step by the owning lane. host_receipts validate (8), validate.py, component_matrix --check, new_host_grand_list --check, evidence_manifest --check and validate_convergence --all-recorded pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Record agent-lab-e9's independent agree reviews on the macos-m5pro-20260924 use receipts Independent review from the WSL authoring host (different machine and identity): workflow wf_b3b5c3b4-c85 at bc8cee5 (14 agents, adversarially verified), plus a re-check at cfa7574 of every requested fix: command -v plus mise/manifest pin lines, the gitleaks sidekiq positive control (exit 1, one finding), the worktrunk create/list/remove/list lifecycle, and corrected claim/limitation text. Validators exit 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-record the macos-m5pro-20260924 use receipts from main commit 2d11464 The previous copies recorded catalog_revision 3772eb5, a branch-only commit that stops being reachable once this PR is squash-merged and its branch deleted. host_receipts.py validate would then fail. These copies were re-recorded with the same ids from a detached scratch checkout of main at 2d11464, as adoption/update.md requires, so catalog_revision is a main commit. The commands, claims and limitations are unchanged apart from one sentence appended to each history limitation that records this re-record. The fresh receipts carry only their self entries. The independent agree reviews in cfa7574 and aebc492 were bound to the replaced records, so they are superseded and are not carried over; they remain in PR #185's history. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Hot-file protocol: take main's evidence.json, re-register this PR's evidence, regenerate reports After rebasing onto main 2d11464, manifests/evidence.json is main's copy with this PR's four evidence files re-registered by the repository's register_file tool: the hardware profile and the three re-recorded use receipts. component_matrix.py --write and new_host_grand_list.py --write regenerate the derived reports. register_file serializes with ASCII escapes, so one existing non-ASCII path that main stores literally is re-encoded to the same JSON value. No other entry changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add independent agree reviews to the main-bound macos-m5pro-20260924 receipts The rtk, gitleaks and worktrunk use receipts were re-recorded from main commit 2d11464 so that catalog_revision stays reachable after a squash merge. This independent session (a different identity from the recorder, on the same Mac): - confirmed 2d11464 is an ancestor of origin/main; - found commands, claims and results identical to the ea31d6f copies it reproduced earlier. Only the history limitation gained a re-record sentence; - re-ran the gitleaks probe: the clean commit exits 0, and the sidekiq-secret fixture exits 1 with leaks found: 1. Agree on all three. verdict_flip_candidates.py reports untested -> accepted support on macos-arm64 for worktrunk (git-github-automation, isolation, workers), gitleaks (secrets-credentials, security-supply-chain) and rtk (token-efficiency). host_receipts validate (9), validate.py, component_matrix --check, new_host_grand_list --check and evidence_manifest --check pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-record agent-lab-e9's independent agree reviews on the main-bound macos-m5pro-20260924 receipts The receipts were re-recorded from main 2d11464 (so catalog_revision survives a squash merge), which reset their reviews. Commands, exits, claim, class and host are identical to the copies reviewed at cfa7574; only a history limitation sentence was added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: seathatflowsinourveins <234074349+seathatflowsinourveins@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
First macOS arm64 run of the us-equities paper engine's synthetic suites, recorded with
scripts/host_receipts.py record(evidence classlocal_integration, stageuse, platformmacos-arm64, second physical machine, resultpass). No engine or blueprint source changed; nothing touches a broker, credentials, market data or study data.evidence/hosts/macos-m5pro-20260924/macos-m5pro-20260924--nautilus-trader--use--20260924.jsonevidence/artifacts/macos-syn-e2e-20260924/: the hash lock and its input, the invented-ticker mover scan, the mover SYN receipt, the capacity fixture output, andsummary.json(host facts, per-module counts, the sandboxed first attempt, SYN detail)manifests/evidence.jsonregisters the 7 new files and re-hashes.github/osv-scanner-lockfiles.json. That inventory now lists the new lock for OSV (its.iniscovered_by_lockfile), astests/test_osv_lockfile_coverage.pyrequires. The OSV API returned 0 advisories for the 20 pins on 2026-09-24.component_matrix.py --writeandnew_host_grand_list.py --writeproduced no change (nautilus-traderis not a landscape winner, so no platform status moves).Host and runtime
Apple M5 Pro (Mac17,8), 18 cores (6 Super, 12 Performance), 24 GB, macOS 26.5.1 (25F80), arm64.
CPython 3.12.14 (uv 0.12.18, installed with
--no-bininto the worktree's gitignored.runtime/).uv pip sync --require-hashesinstalled 20 packages, including the lane pins nautilus-trader 2.0.0rc5 (cp312-macosx_11_0_arm64wheel) and alpaca-py 0.44.0, plus the engine recipe's numpy 2.5.3 and pandas 3.0.6. The installed set matches the lock exactly, anduv pip checkis clean.Recorded results
python -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_adaptive_paper_*.py' -v... -p 'test_native_faults_min.py'(native-faults offline cases)... -p 'test_adaptive_market_research.py'mover_runner.py synthetic --scan <artifact scan> --allow-stale-scanbenchmark.pyThe skip is by design:
exchange_calendarsis not in the lane runtime (test_adaptive_paper_sessions). The mover P&L comes frommover_runner.synthetic_path's scripted prices, so it is not an outcome.Sandboxed first attempt. In Claude Code's Seatbelt sandbox, the same adaptive-paper command ran 732 tests with 3 errors, all
PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permittedfromsocket.bindinMetricsHttpServerTests. The sandbox denies local port binding. The rerun, and the recording, ran with the sandbox disabled. Every other command passed inside the sandbox, where~/.config/native-agent-stackwas unreadable.~/.local/state/native-agent-stack(engine STOP, locks, ledgers) did not exist before the runs or after them.Limits
local_integrationonly: the real NautilusTrader LiveNode engine ran against the repository's synthetic ports. It is not paper or live acceptance for Alpaca or IBKR.trading-nautilusprofile listsbwrap, which macOS lacks, so the network-namespaced engine replay is not covered. Nohardware_profile.py --record-hostentry was made; this host has 24 GB, not the 64 GB of the projected macOS host.Checks
validate.py,host_receipts.py validate,component_matrix.py --check,new_host_grand_list.py --check,evidence_manifest.py --check,validate_catalogs.py,validate_foundation.py,landscape.py,validate_convergence.py --all-recorded,build_verdicts.py --checkandbuild_ecosystem.py --checkall passed. With the files staged, the OSV coverage, host receipt, platform status and staleness tests passed (166 OK).gitleaks diron both new directories and on the two modified files found no leaks.The full
python3 -m unitteston this host (system Python 3.14.7, inside the sandbox) ran 3932 tests with 2 failures, 36 errors and 510 skips. I reran the 8 affected modules (350 tests) without the sandbox. That cleared every sandbox error (loopback bind, hard-coded/tmp,ps) and the OSV coverage failure, which was a race: I edited the inventory while the suite ran. Three failures remain, all unrelated to this change:test_adoption_bootstrap_macos.LlamaWrapperQuotingTests.test_install_path_with_shell_syntax_is_data_in_the_wrapperis macOS-specific. SIP stripsDYLD_LIBRARY_PATHfrom the test's#!/bin/shfake server, so the printed value is empty. It passes on Linux runners.test_catalog_freshness_proposesetUpClasserrors happen because this host's global gitleaks pre-commit hook (core.hooksPath) blocks the scratch-copy commit on findings in existing catalog files. CI has no such hook.🤖 Generated with Claude Code