Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cubeSize + padding for non-mag1 ad-hoc meshes #7799

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fm3
Copy link
Member

@fm3 fm3 commented May 14, 2024

URL of deployed dev instance (used for testing):

Steps to test:

  • Create volume annotation with very coarse mags only. Brush some, load ad-hoc mesh
  • Should load a fully closed complete mesh

Issues:


@fm3 fm3 marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2024 12:47
@fm3 fm3 requested a review from philippotto May 14, 2024 12:47
Copy link
Member

@philippotto philippotto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome, thanks for fixing this 🙏 I suggested two var extractions.

frontend/javascripts/oxalis/model/sagas/mesh_saga.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
frontend/javascripts/oxalis/model/sagas/mesh_saga.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fm3 fm3 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 14, 2024 13:06
@fm3 fm3 merged commit 3ab7382 into master May 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@fm3 fm3 deleted the adhocmesh-cubesize branch May 14, 2024 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ad hoc meshing does not work for segmentations with mags >= 64
2 participants