Skip to content

Conversation

@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #182

Copy link
Contributor

@MaximeKjaer MaximeKjaer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks good. But do we risk running into the same kind of issue with the other operators? Or what is it that is unique about && that caused the issue — is it that it could be a legal identifier it wasn't already a logical operator? These are perhaps questions that could be addressed in a comment in the TS file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

&&& not highlighted correctly

2 participants