Re-use isConcrete checking in match types for NamedTuple.From #20947
+75
−62
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
odersky
changed the title
- Move isConcrete to a new object `MatchTypes`. We should also move other MatchType-related stuff from Types and TypeComparer here. Type and TypeComparer are already unconfortably big, and MatchTypes are a coherent topic where everything should work together. - Streamline isConcrete a bit. - Re-use isConcrete for a similar test in CheckRealizable. - Re-use isConcrete for evaluating NamedTuple.From Fixes scala#20517
sjrd
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2024
smarter
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MatchTypes. We should also move other MatchType-related stuff from Types and TypeComparer here. Type and TypeComparer are already unconfortably big, and MatchTypes are a coherent topic where everything should work together.Fixes #20517