-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reimplement support for type aliases in SAM types #18317
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
trait Sam1: | ||
type T | ||
def apply(x: T): T | ||
|
||
trait Sam2: | ||
var x: Int = 1 // To force anonymous class generation | ||
type T | ||
def apply(x: T): T | ||
|
||
object Test: | ||
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = | ||
val s1: Sam1 { type T = String } = x => x.trim | ||
s1.apply("foo") | ||
val s2: Sam2 { type T = Int } = x => x + 1 | ||
s2.apply(1) |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if I'm asking for too much but I thought it would be nice if the type member of a SAM type could be inferred based on an explicitly provided type in a lambda, which led me to suggesting 2 additional test cases:
bar
works as expected but the application offoo
doesn't compile:Would it be a big deal to make
foo
work?Otherwise LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should definitely not make more things work in this space. What this PR "fixes" is already off-spec, because it is not legal to put a refinement type in an
extends
clause. It happened to work in 3.3.0 by accident, and so we're preserving the status quo in the name of backward compatibility within a patch series. But we should in fact make it an error in 3.4.x.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I wouldn't want to add more than this and definitely not in a PR that fixes a regression