Skip to content

Conversation

@odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Mar 17, 2021

When typechecking a new expression, we cannot reliably tell what the actual underlying
type is since this might depend on type inference that still has to happen at this point.

Fixes #11781

odersky added 2 commits March 17, 2021 12:20
When typechecking a new expression, we cannot reliably tell what the actual underlying
type is since this might depend on type inference that still has to happen at this point.
Copy link
Contributor

@liufengyun liufengyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@liufengyun liufengyun merged commit f267f91 into scala:master Mar 17, 2021
@liufengyun liufengyun deleted the fix-11781 branch March 17, 2021 13:35
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Aug 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression: new <type alias> should compile

3 participants