-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add CategoricalMADE
#1269
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add CategoricalMADE
#1269
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1269 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.05% 77.87% -8.19%
==========================================
Files 118 119 +1
Lines 8672 8786 +114
==========================================
- Hits 7463 6842 -621
- Misses 1209 1944 +735
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
…too. log_prob has shape issues tho
…ting mixed_density estimator log_probs and sample to work as well
…rg to categorical_model
Hey @janfb, Currently the PR adds the As far as I can tell all functionalities of The question now is: How should I verify this works? / Which tests should I add/modify? Do you have an idea for a good toy example with several discrete variables that I could use? I have cooked up a toy simulator, for which I am getting good posteriors using SNPE, but for some reason MNLE raises a This is the simulator def toy_simulator(theta: torch.Tensor, centers: list[torch.Tensor]) -> torch.Tensor:
batch_size, n_dimensions = theta.shape
assert len(centers) == n_dimensions, "Number of center sets must match theta dimensions"
# Calculate discrete classes by assiging to the closest center
x_disc = torch.stack([
torch.argmin(torch.abs(centers[i].unsqueeze(1) - theta[:, i].unsqueeze(0)), dim=0)
for i in range(n_dimensions)
], dim=1)
closest_centers = torch.stack([centers[i][x_disc[:, i]] for i in range(n_dimensions)], dim=1)
# Add Gaussian noise to assigned class centers
std = 0.4
x_cont = closest_centers + std * torch.randn_like(closest_centers)
return torch.cat([x_cont, x_disc], dim=1) The setup: torch.random.manual_seed(0)
centers = [
torch.tensor([-0.5, 0.5]),
# torch.tensor([-1.0, 0.0, 1.0]),
]
prior = BoxUniform(low=torch.tensor([-2.0]*len(centers)), high=torch.tensor([2.0]*len(centers)))
theta = prior.sample((20000,))
x = toy_simulator(theta, centers)
theta_o = prior.sample((1,))
x_o = toy_simulator(theta_o, centers) NPE: trainer = SNPE()
estimator = trainer.append_simulations(theta=theta, x=x).train(training_batch_size=1000)
snpe_posterior = trainer.build_posterior(prior=prior)
posterior_samples = snpe_posterior.sample((2000,), x=x_o)
pairplot(posterior_samples, limits=[[-2, 2], [-2, 2]], figsize=(5, 5), points=theta_o) and the equivalent MNLE: trainer = MNLE()
estimator = trainer.append_simulations(theta=theta, x=x).train(training_batch_size=1000)
mnle_posterior = trainer.build_posterior(prior=prior)
mnle_samples = mnle_posterior.sample((10000,), x=x_o)
pairplot(mnle_samples, limits=[[-2, 2], [-2, 2]], figsize=(5, 5), points=theta_o) Hoping this makes sense. Lemme know if you need clarifications anywhere. Thanks for your feedback. |
Hey @janfb, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks a lot for tackling this @jnsbck! 👏
Please find below some comments and questions.
There might be some misunderstanding about variables
and categories
on my side. We can have a call if that's more efficient than commenting here.
epsilon=1e-2, | ||
custom_initialization=True, | ||
embedding_net: Optional[nn.Module] = nn.Identity(), | ||
): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please add docstring with brief explanation and arg list.
categories, # Tensor[int] | ||
hidden_features, | ||
context_features=None, | ||
num_blocks=2, | ||
use_residual_blocks=True, | ||
random_mask=False, | ||
activation=F.relu, | ||
dropout_probability=0.0, | ||
use_batch_norm=False, | ||
epsilon=1e-2, | ||
custom_initialization=True, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please add types.
if custom_initialization: | ||
self._initialize() | ||
|
||
def forward(self, inputs, context=None): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missing types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and short docstring.
embedded_context = self.embedding_net.forward(context) | ||
return super().forward(inputs, context=embedded_context) | ||
|
||
def compute_probs(self, outputs): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add types and short docstring.
# outputs (batch_size, num_variables, num_categories) | ||
def log_prob(self, inputs, context=None): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove inline comment and instead add types, return types and docstring with details on the return dimensions if needed.
self.num_variables = len(categories) | ||
self.num_categories = int(max(categories)) | ||
self.categories = categories |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am confused by the notion of these three variables.
what's the difference between variables and categories here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what type does categories
have?
"this is not the case for the passed `x` do not use this function.", | ||
stacklevel=2, | ||
) | ||
# Separate continuous and discrete data. | ||
cont_x, disc_x = _separate_input(batch_x) | ||
num_disc = int(torch.sum(_is_discrete(batch_x))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please add num_categorical_columns
as input arg to this function to enable users to pass this number. Inferring it from batch_x
should be the fallback with warning.
z_score_y="none", # y-embedding net already z-scores. | ||
num_hidden=hidden_features, | ||
num_layers=hidden_layers, | ||
embedding_net=embedding_net, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pass num_categories
here as well.
elif categorical_model == "mlp": | ||
assert num_disc == 1, "MLP only supports 1D input." | ||
discrete_net = build_categoricalmassestimator( | ||
disc_x, | ||
batch_y, | ||
z_score_x="none", # discrete data should not be z-scored. | ||
z_score_y="none", # y-embedding net already z-scores. | ||
num_hidden=hidden_features, | ||
num_layers=hidden_layers, | ||
embedding_net=embedding_net, | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
more generally, isn't the MLP a special case of the MADE? can't we absorb them into one class?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should eventually be integrated with the MNLE tutorial in 12_iid_data_and_permutation_invariant_embeddings.ipynb
Cool, thanks for all the feedback! A quick call would be great, also to discuss suitable tests for this. Will reach out via email and tackle the straight forward things in the meantime. |
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes
This implements a
CategoricalMADE
to generelize MNLE to multiple discrete dimensions addressing #1112.Essentially adapts
nflows
's MixtureofGaussiansMADE to autoregressively model categorical distributions.Does this close any currently open issues?
Fixes #1112
Comments
I have already discussed this with @michaeldeistler.
Checklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creatingthe PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to
help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging
your code.
guidelines
with
pytest.mark.slow
.guidelines
main
(or there are no conflicts withmain
)