This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 24, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mgreter, (since I don't have definite proof with steps of reproduction, so I don't want it to create an issue for it): Sometimes, I get a debug info printed on the screen where we are setting
sass_option_set_option_path, sometimes it happens on setting the next option. So do we need to guard it with condition:if(output)like here? Don't we have these conditional guards on libsass side, as we pass nullptr for every empty option string we receive to libsass?PS: Sometimes == extremely occasional (probably when I am doing some random testing and debugging some weird scenarios, I am unable to draw definite pattern for it till now)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably taken over from previous code!
It should be protected in libsass itself, but the code line above actually has some different meaning, since it would overwrite the previous output path in that case. You also did not include which debug info gets printed!?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I will capture it next time. It was invalid instruction or SIGILL (and the first line mentioned
glibc). I will try to capture it next time.Thanks for the clarification on settings! 👍