Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/preview-url-secret to v2 #7641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/preview-url-secret to v2 #7641

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 21, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/preview-url-secret (source) ^1.6.1 -> ^2.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/preview-url-secret)

v2.0.0

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • presentation: lower minimum role from Editor to Contributor
Features
  • add /constants export for advanced usage (db83869)
  • add preview link sharing with QR code (#​1994) (3f62247)
  • lower minimum role from Editor to Contributor for creating Preview URL Secrets necessary to start Draft Mode (5e32bdc)
  • presentation: lower minimum role from Editor to Contributor (b4fb0a8)
  • validatePreviewUrl: add studioPreviewPerspective (#​1995) (317d15c)
Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2024 15:16
@renovate renovate bot removed the request for review from a team October 21, 2024 15:16
@renovate renovate bot added the 🤖 bot label Oct 21, 2024
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from ryanbonial October 21, 2024 15:16
@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 21, 2024 3:39pm
performance-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) 💬 Add feedback Oct 21, 2024 3:39pm
test-compiled-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Oct 21, 2024 3:39pm
test-next-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Oct 21, 2024 3:39pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 21, 2024 3:39pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 21, 2024 3:39pm

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-preview-url-secret-2.x branch from 8200fe9 to 7d511ff Compare October 21, 2024 15:22
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Oct 21, 2024 3:28 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 47s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 30s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 38s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 11s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 32s 1 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 45s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 38s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 14s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 8s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 35s 12 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:31:59 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest		 experiment
latency of this branch		 Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 16.1 efps (62ms) 16.9 efps (59ms) -3ms (-4.8%) ✅
article (body) 54.6 efps (18ms) 58.0 efps (17ms) -1ms (-5.7%) ✅
article (string inside object) 18.2 efps (55ms) 18.2 efps (55ms) +0ms (-/-%) ✅
article (string inside array) 14.5 efps (69ms) 14.3 efps (70ms) +1ms (+1.4%) ✅
recipe (name) 30.3 efps (33ms) 31.3 efps (32ms) -1ms (-3.0%) ✅
recipe (description) 34.5 efps (29ms) 34.5 efps (29ms) +0ms (-/-%) ✅
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (7ms) +1ms (-/-%) ✅
synthetic (title) 14.9 efps (67ms) 14.9 efps (67ms) +0ms (-/-%) ✅
synthetic (string inside object) 14.8 efps (68ms) 14.9 efps (67ms) -1ms (-0.7%) ✅

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 62ms 67ms 92ms 215ms 518ms 14.7s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 27ms 235ms 273ms 5.7s
article (string inside object) 55ms 58ms 66ms 106ms 225ms 8.5s
article (string inside array) 69ms 73ms 78ms 176ms 919ms 9.7s
recipe (name) 33ms 36ms 43ms 81ms 45ms 9.4s
recipe (description) 29ms 31ms 35ms 63ms 0ms 5.9s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 27ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 67ms 71ms 78ms 296ms 1260ms 15.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 68ms 72ms 89ms 400ms 1773ms 11.0s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 59ms 64ms 73ms 252ms 411ms 14.3s
article (body) 17ms 21ms 23ms 212ms 291ms 6.0s
article (string inside object) 55ms 57ms 66ms 236ms 278ms 8.5s
article (string inside array) 70ms 74ms 91ms 211ms 976ms 9.8s
recipe (name) 32ms 34ms 36ms 91ms 14ms 9.0s
recipe (description) 29ms 33ms 55ms 138ms 0ms 6.2s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 8ms 9ms 10ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 67ms 70ms 97ms 301ms 1311ms 15.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 67ms 72ms 115ms 470ms 1712ms 10.2s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@stipsan stipsan added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into next with commit 816067e Oct 21, 2024
67 checks passed
@stipsan stipsan deleted the renovate/sanity-preview-url-secret-2.x branch October 21, 2024 16:05
bjoerge added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
@bjoerge
Merge branch 'next' into corel
904c978 
* next:
  v3.62.0
  fix: warnings on React 19 (#7654)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/ui to ^2.8.10 (#7652)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/ui to ^2.8.10 (#7653)
  chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/visual-editing to v2.2.2 (#7651)
  fix(core): inherit readOnly state from ancestors in copyPaste function (#7643)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/mutate to ^0.10.1 (#7650)
  fix(deps): Update dev-non-major (#7649)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/presentation to v1.17.3 (#7648)
  fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.1.5 (#7638)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/presentation to v1.17.2 (#7647)
  fix(deps): Update dev-non-major (#7646)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/presentation to v1.17.1 (#7645)
  chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/preview-url-secret to v2 (#7641)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/presentation to v1.17.0 (#7640)
  fix(deps): Update dev-non-major (#7639)
  chore(cli): update help copy for deploy command (#7624)
  chore(test-studio): add asset types to structure navigation (#7631)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stipsan stipsan stipsan approved these changes

@ryanbonial ryanbonial Awaiting requested review from ryanbonial ryanbonial was automatically assigned from sanity-io/sdk

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🤖 bot 📦 deps ⚠️ major
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@stipsan