Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Y24-353 Fix for Missing data on edit for ONT runs #1983

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

seenanair
Copy link
Contributor

@seenanair seenanair commented Sep 30, 2024

Closes #1982

Changes proposed in this pull request

Update the 'include' parameter in the 'find' and 'create' method of createRequest so that destructuring of parameters works as in v1

Correct unit test cases to replicate the way it is called from stores

Instructions for Reviewers

[All PRs] - Confirm PR template filled
[Feature Branches] - Review code
[Production Merges to main]
    - Check story numbers included
    - Check for debug code
    - Check version

Copy link
Collaborator

@stevieing stevieing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need an addition to the e2e test for creating and editing an ONT run to ensure the data is shown? This will guard against a similar issue in the future.

@seenanair
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we need an addition to the e2e test for creating and editing an ONT run to ensure the data is shown? This will guard against a similar issue in the future.

I actually tried it, but it didn't work as I expected. Might need bit more time looking into it.

@stevieing
Copy link
Collaborator

Do we need an addition to the e2e test for creating and editing an ONT run to ensure the data is shown? This will guard against a similar issue in the future.

I actually tried it, but it didn't work as I expected. Might need bit more time looking into it.

OK. Let's timebox it and if needed roll it into it's own story. It may well be an issue with the page loading. The ONT run page is very slow to load. We do have a technical debt story somewhere.

@seenanair
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we need an addition to the e2e test for creating and editing an ONT run to ensure the data is shown? This will guard against a similar issue in the future.

I actually tried it, but it didn't work as I expected. Might need bit more time looking into it.

OK. Let's timebox it and if needed roll it into it's own story. It may well be an issue with the page loading. The ONT run page is very slow to load. We do have a technical debt story somewhere.

Ok. Also, it would be good to add similar e2e test cases for Pacbio Pool, Runs etc. for the same reason

@stevieing
Copy link
Collaborator

Do we need an addition to the e2e test for creating and editing an ONT run to ensure the data is shown? This will guard against a similar issue in the future.

I actually tried it, but it didn't work as I expected. Might need bit more time looking into it.

OK. Let's timebox it and if needed roll it into it's own story. It may well be an issue with the page loading. The ONT run page is very slow to load. We do have a technical debt story somewhere.

Ok. Also, it would be good to add similar e2e test cases for Pacbio Pool, Runs etc. for the same reason

I have created a story #1984

@stevieing stevieing self-requested a review September 30, 2024 14:35
stevieing
stevieing previously approved these changes Sep 30, 2024

// Check that the URL is correct
cy.url().should('include', '#/ont/run/2')
cy.get('#flowcell-id-1').invoke('val').should('eq', 'ABC1234')
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Advisory. We should probably change this so it relates to the store data but I suggest we do that at another time and get this story deployed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok 👍

@seenanair seenanair merged commit cb16fe2 into develop Sep 30, 2024
4 checks passed
@seenanair seenanair deleted the y24-353-ont-run-missing-data-on-edit branch September 30, 2024 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Y24-353 - [BUG] ONT - Missing run data on edit
2 participants