-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MergeSamFiles accept SO:UNKNOWN #1069
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -552,12 +552,6 @@ public Object[][] tagCorrectlyProcessData() throws IOException { | |
"@RG\tID:0\tSM:Hi,Mom!\n" + | ||
"E\t147\tchr1\t15\t255\t10M\t=\t2\t-30\tCAACAGAAGC\t)'.*.+2,))\tU2:Z:CAA"; | ||
|
||
final String SOTagCorrectlyProcessTestData = | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. why is this removed? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thank you for your reply and sorry for the delay. We've removed this test case since as @a-filipp0v said, it's redundant after our implementation. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. not sure I understand...if it's just "Redundant" but not exactly equals, I'd ask that it be left in. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This case does not pass now, since we no longer treat SO:NOTKNOWN as error as test expects. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. got it |
||
"@HD\tVN:1.0\tSO:NOTKNOWN\n" + | ||
"@SQ\tSN:chr1\tLN:101\n" + | ||
"@RG\tID:0\tSM:Hi,Mom!\n" + | ||
"E\t147\tchr1\t15\t255\t10M\t=\t2\t-30\tCAACAGAAGC\t)'.*.+2,))\tU2:Z:CAA"; | ||
|
||
final String GOTagCorrectlyProcessTestData = | ||
"@HD\tVN:1.0\tGO:NOTKNOWN\n" + | ||
"@SQ\tSN:chr1\tLN:101\n" + | ||
|
@@ -568,7 +562,6 @@ public Object[][] tagCorrectlyProcessData() throws IOException { | |
{E2TagCorrectlyProcessTestData.getBytes(), SAMValidationError.Type.E2_BASE_EQUALS_PRIMARY_BASE}, | ||
{E2TagCorrectlyProcessTestData.getBytes(), SAMValidationError.Type.MISMATCH_READ_LENGTH_AND_E2_LENGTH}, | ||
{U2TagCorrectlyProcessTestData.getBytes(), SAMValidationError.Type.MISMATCH_READ_LENGTH_AND_U2_LENGTH}, | ||
{SOTagCorrectlyProcessTestData.getBytes(), SAMValidationError.Type.HEADER_TAG_NON_CONFORMING_VALUE}, | ||
{GOTagCorrectlyProcessTestData.getBytes(), SAMValidationError.Type.HEADER_TAG_NON_CONFORMING_VALUE} | ||
}; | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In
setSortOrder()
the code uses.name()
instead of.toString()
which I think is clearer; either way the code should be consistent.Also, it seems odd that
setSortOrder()
setssortOrder
to non-null, if the argument is a validSortOrder
, but this method sets it tonull
. Maybe this method should just callsetSortOrder()
whenkey
isSORT_ORDER_TAG
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pshapiro4broad that's how the old implementation also does it...it let's the super-class deal with it...take a look at htsjdk.samtools.SAMFileHeader#getSortOrder, I think that might clarify things up (and note that this.sortOrder is private)