-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moving the code from picard to htsjdk #2
Comments
I think your main confusion was that picard was split into two: picard and htsjdk, with net.sf.picard.* staying in picard, while net.sf.samtools.* and org.* going into htsjdk, albeit with package names renamed. Some classes from net.sf.picard were moved into htsjdk. |
fnothaft
pushed a commit
to fnothaft/htsjdk
that referenced
this issue
Sep 6, 2014
Fix compilation (by using single version for depends) and generate sources and javadoc jars
cmnbroad
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2018
Adding LICENSE and initial AUTHORS file
jmthibault79
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2019
# This is the 1st commit message: move Container.setByteOffset() call inside ContainerIO.readContainer() - also ContainerHeaderIO.readContainerHeader() restrict access to setByteOffset() and encapsulate Container.slices # This is the commit message #2: oops # This is the commit message #3: a little unrelated cleanup # This is the commit message #4: oops # This is the commit message #5: better CRAIEntryTest # This is the commit message #6: test improvements and a fix # This is the commit message #7: comment # This is the commit message #8: javadoc # This is the commit message #9: review comments # This is the commit message #10: comments and clarification for CRAMBAIIndexer
yfarjoun
pushed a commit
to yfarjoun/htsjdk
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, I'm currently moving my code from picard1.100 to htsjdk. So far I cannot see how I should now map those 'old' classes:
any hint ?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: