Track revisions for tracked-fields only #709
Merged
+33
−25
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for salsa-rs canceled.
|
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #709 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
MichaReiser
commented
Feb 21, 2025
MichaReiser
force-pushed
the
avoid-tracking-revisions-for-untracked-fields
branch
from
027db45 to
779e138
Compare
MichaReiser
changed the title
MichaReiser
force-pushed
the
avoid-tracking-revisions-for-untracked-fields
branch
from
779e138 to
cc5baaf
Compare
MichaReiser
force-pushed
the
avoid-tracking-revisions-for-untracked-fields
branch
from
cc5baaf to
e1884ba
Compare
Veykril
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on #708
Avoid tracking revisions for untracked fields (all tracked fields are covered by the tracked struct's
created_atfield). This should reduce memory consumption of tracked structs because it avoids tracking unused revisions for untracked field.Closes #672