Documentation Improvements of Characteristic Classes

[DeRhamSource]

In order to avoid misunderstandings, the term 'genus' was removed in the documentation. Actually, in terms of topology this expression even seems to be wrong for the additive case!

CC: @egourgoulhon @tscrim

Component: geometry

Keywords: characteristic classes, vector bundles

Author: Michael Jung

Branch/Commit: a94b358

Reviewer: Varenyam Bakshi

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28854

[DeRhamSource]

Branch: u/gh-DeRhamSource/documentation_improvements_of_characteristic_classes

[DeRhamSource]

New commits:

d557f43

Trac #28854: term 'genus' removed in documentation

[DeRhamSource]

Commit: d557f43

[DeRhamSource]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
+In order to avoid possible misunderstandings, the term 'genus' was removed in the documentation.
 
+Perhaps some more improvements will come.

[DeRhamSource]

Changed keywords from none to characteristic classes, vector bundles

[DeRhamSource]

Author: Michael Jung

[DeRhamSource]

comment:3

Please give it a positive review as soon as possible. Thanks! :)

[DeRhamSource]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
-In order to avoid possible misunderstandings, the term 'genus' was removed in the documentation.
-
-Perhaps some more improvements will come.
+In order to avoid misunderstandings, the term 'genus' was removed in the documentation. Actually, in terms of topology this expression even seems to be wrong for the additive case!

[DeRhamSource]

comment:4

We are at beta9 already. Still, is it likely to have this change in Sage9?

[tscrim]

comment:6

I don't feel qualified enough to be able to answer this as it is not my area of expertise. I might be able to grab a geometer to check it, but I cannot promise that. I can say at least the changes are code-wise correct.

Eric, this is essentially a trivial ticket, can you quickly check it?