Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SQDEV-3594] Feature enforcement backend #87

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

slisaasquatch
Copy link
Contributor

@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch commented Jun 10, 2024

Description of the change

  • Added the new RETRACT_REFERRAL_CONVERSION mutation for program transactions

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation or Development tools (readme, specs, tests, code formatting)

Links

Checklists

Development

  • Prettier was run (if applicable)
  • The behaviour changes in the pull request are covered by specs
  • All tests related to the changed code pass in development

Paperwork

  • This pull request has a descriptive title and information useful to a reviewer
  • This pull request has a Jira number
  • This pull request has a Process.st launch checklist

Code review

  • Changes have been reviewed by at least one other engineer
  • Security impacts of this change have been considered

Copy link
Member

@johanventer johanventer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just needs final deploy before merge

@ianhitchcock ianhitchcock changed the title Feature enforcement backend [SQDEV-3594] Feature enforcement backend Jun 28, 2024
@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch merged commit d069991 into master Jul 3, 2024
8 checks passed
@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch deleted the feature-enforcement branch July 3, 2024 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants