Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SQDEV-3550] Make unnecessary fields optional in widgets #85

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

slisaasquatch
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change

Description here

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation or Development tools (readme, specs, tests, code formatting)

Links

  • Jira issue number: (PUT IT HERE)
  • Process.st launch checklist: (PUT IT HERE)

Checklists

Development

  • Prettier was run (if applicable)
  • The behaviour changes in the pull request are covered by specs
  • All tests related to the changed code pass in development

Paperwork

  • This pull request has a descriptive title and information useful to a reviewer
  • This pull request has a Jira number
  • This pull request has a Process.st launch checklist

Code review

  • Changes have been reviewed by at least one other engineer
  • Security impacts of this change have been considered

@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch changed the title Make "plugins" optional in widgets Make unnecessary fields optional in widgets Feb 15, 2024
@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch changed the title Make unnecessary fields optional in widgets [SQDEV-3550] Make unnecessary fields optional in widgets Feb 15, 2024
johanventer
johanventer previously approved these changes Feb 15, 2024
@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch merged commit ce5913b into master Feb 16, 2024
8 checks passed
@slisaasquatch slisaasquatch deleted the widget-20240214 branch February 16, 2024 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants