-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove automatic (delayed) reseed-on-fork #1379
Conversation
The only thing these achieve is a different error message
/// (every 64 kiB — see [`ReseedingRng`] documentation for details). | ||
/// | ||
/// `ThreadRng` is not automatically reseeded on fork. It is recommended to | ||
/// explicitly call [`ThreadRng::reseed`] immediately after a fork, for example: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It also could be worth to mention pthread_atfork
as a potential approach for doing this.
UPD: Further in the docs fork handlers are discussed and it's indeed not safe to mess with ThreadRng
state in fork handlers, including child ones.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically, it might be okay: ThreadRng
methods should not be called at the time fork()
happens. But I don't see the need to advertise this beyond what is already said.
Nightly builds fail due to zerocopy (google/zerocopy#844). Probably a good idea to leave this PR open a little longer anyway in case anyone has concerns about the removal of automatic reseed-on-fork. |
No further comments, so I'll merge now. In case @tarcieri @briansmith or others have concerns, we still have the option to revert before 0.9. |
See also #1362 #1377
CC @thomcc
Remove integrated fork protection.
Add
ThreadRng::reseed
and doc to suggest calling this on fork.Make
ReseedingRng::reseed
also clear the random value cache.