-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doc: improve random, thread_rng, ThreadRng docs #1257
Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. As for the once-cell
issue, ideally rust-version
should be used for dependencies resolution, but alas...
Another option is to remove |
|
@dhardy |
@newpavlov I reuse "work" branches — that's why it doesn't have a topical name. Which branches should be deleted? This should possibly be a new issue. |
It's just that I usually use per-feature branches, i.e. I create a new branch for every PR. I think you can keep reusing "work" branches even with automatic deletion, you would simply need to do remote push for each new PR. |
/// (every 64 kiB, as well as "soon" after a fork on Unix — see [`ReseedingRng`] | ||
/// documentation for details). | ||
/// | ||
/// Security must be considered relative to a thread model and validation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo: threat -> threat
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, but this is merged already. Can you make a PR? (Should be possible through the GitHub web UI.)
Closes #1256.
@newpavlov review please?