Skip to content

Conversation

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Dec 9, 2025

This PR unifies our documentation a little bit, and rewrites the job queue documentation to reflect the latest state, and remove duplicated things that were already documented in the glossary and the DB schema.

I'd like to request a review also from someone who hasn't interacted with the new system at all (e.g. @marcoieni or @Mark-Simulacrum), to see if it's comprehensible to other people (mainly the job-queue.md document).

--collector_name "<name>" \
--target <target> \
--benchmark_set "<benchmark-set>" \
--is_active
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Presumably this needs to be run with credentials - maybe on the instance itself?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't need to be on the collector machine, but it needs access to the database where the collector will be stored, yeah.

Copy link
Contributor

@Jamesbarford Jamesbarford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think the content is great, good work. I just wonder about how we structure the docs

@Kobzol Kobzol added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit ba8021a Dec 11, 2025
14 checks passed
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the unify-docs branch December 11, 2025 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants