-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use FxIndexSet
for region_bound_pairs
#99725
Conversation
8224cf7
to
2e796ac
Compare
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 2e796ac with merge c806a63d71145dfc9d118c63fe11d086162304d4... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued c806a63d71145dfc9d118c63fe11d086162304d4 with parent 2fdbf07, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (c806a63d71145dfc9d118c63fe11d086162304d4): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
cool 🎉 @bors r+ rollup=never |
⌛ Testing commit 2e796ac with merge 0ec194b7af122526d0f8270498b3a5660f8c5ae2... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors retry |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
same issue again afaict? cc @rust-lang/infra @bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (ada80a1): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
should help with #99217 and might generally be a perf improvement.
r? types