Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #99047

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 8, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #99047

merged 15 commits into from
Jul 8, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

yoshuawuyts and others added 15 commits June 30, 2022 17:22
When moving this to rustbuild, I introduced a bug: if you had the file already downloaded, but
deleted the sysroot for whatever reason, rustbuil would fail to unpack the cached tarball.

This only affects people if they have a cached tarball, which is probably why we haven't seen an issue yet -
wiping `build/cache` would work around the issue, or just not deleting `build/$TARGET/stage2`.
Formerly `-Zterminal-width`, `--terminal-width` allows the user or build
tool to inform rustc of the width of the terminal so that diagnostics
can be truncated.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Rename the `--terminal-width` flag to `--output-width` as the behaviour
doesn't just apply to terminals (and so is slightly less accurate).

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Rename the `--output-width` flag to `--diagnostic-width` as this appears
to be the preferred name within the compiler team.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
This lint seems to have been broken by rust-lang#98446
…ion, r=oli-obk

sess: stabilize `--terminal-width` as `--diagnostic-width`

Formerly `-Zterminal-width`, `--terminal-width` allows the user or build
tool to inform rustc of the width of the terminal so that diagnostics
can be truncated.

Pending agreement to stabilize, see tracking issue at rust-lang#84673.

r? ```@oli-obk```
…r=yaahc

Stabilize `into_future`

rust-lang#67644 has been labeled with [S-tracking-ready-to-stabilize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/S-tracking-ready-to-stabilize) - which mentions someone needs to file a stabilization PR. So hence this PR! ✨ Thanks!

Closes rust-lang#67644

r? ``@joshtriplett``
…anup, r=compiler-errors

A few cleanups

Each commit is (mostly) self-explanatory. These changes have come as I try to remove `ReEmpty` (rust-lang#98559).
…k-Simulacrum

Fix caching bug in `download-rustc = true`

When moving this to rustbuild, I introduced a bug: if you had the file already downloaded, but
deleted the sysroot for whatever reason, rustbuil would fail to unpack the cached tarball.

This only affects people if they have a cached tarball, which is probably why we haven't seen an issue yet -
wiping `build/cache` would work around the issue, or just not deleting `build/$TARGET/stage2`.

Fixes the following error:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(&lib_dir) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2) ("/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust2/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ci-rustc/lib")', config.rs:1563:20
```

r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Add test for and fix rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131

This lint seems to have been broken by rust-lang#98446 -- but of course, there was no clippy test for this case at the time.

`expr.span.ctxt().outer_expn_data()` now has `MacroKind::Derive` instead of `MacroKind::Attr` for something like:

```
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct UnderscoreInStruct {
    _foo: u32,
}
```

---

changelog: none

closes: rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 8, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2022

📌 Commit 445702d has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 8, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 445702d with merge 0f97e02...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 0f97e02 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 8, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 0f97e02 into rust-lang:master Jul 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 8, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0f97e02): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
1.9% 4.0% 13
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-0.2% -0.2% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) -0.2% -0.2% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
3.8% 4.5% 2
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-3.4% -3.4% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) -3.4% -3.4% 1

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 8, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Looks to be a genuine regression, far exceeding the noise bound for the deeply-nested-multi benchmark. (This is the 4% spike on that graph).

Maybe caused by #98795? That looks to be moving some potentially sensitive code around, maybe needs some inlining help. cc @jackh726

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-01vn70s branch July 30, 2022 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive on used_underscore_binding