Rollup of 6 pull requests #99044
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #99044
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Formerly `-Zterminal-width`, `--terminal-width` allows the user or build tool to inform rustc of the width of the terminal so that diagnostics can be truncated. Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Rename the `--terminal-width` flag to `--output-width` as the behaviour doesn't just apply to terminals (and so is slightly less accurate). Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Rename the `--output-width` flag to `--diagnostic-width` as this appears to be the preferred name within the compiler team. Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
This lint seems to have been broken by rust-lang#98446
…esolve_region, and remove RootEmptyRegion
…ion, r=oli-obk sess: stabilize `--terminal-width` as `--diagnostic-width` Formerly `-Zterminal-width`, `--terminal-width` allows the user or build tool to inform rustc of the width of the terminal so that diagnostics can be truncated. Pending agreement to stabilize, see tracking issue at rust-lang#84673. r? ``@oli-obk``
…stebank
Fix last `let_chains` blocker
In order to forbid things like `let x = (let y = 1);` or `if let a = 1 && { let x = let y = 1; } {}`, the parser **HAS** to know the context of `let`.
This context thing is not a surprise in the parser because you can see **a lot** of ad hoc fixes mixing parsing logic with validation logic creating code that looks more like spaghetti with tomato sauce.
To make things even greater, a new ad hoc fix was added to only allow `let`s in a valid `let_chains` context by checking the previously processed token. This was the only solution I could think of and believe me, I thought about it for a long time 👍
In the long term, it should be preferable to segregate different responsibilities or create a more robust and cleaner parser framework.
cc rust-lang#94927
cc rust-lang#53667
…r=yaahc Stabilize `into_future` rust-lang#67644 has been labeled with [S-tracking-ready-to-stabilize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/S-tracking-ready-to-stabilize) - which mentions someone needs to file a stabilization PR. So hence this PR! ✨ Thanks! Closes rust-lang#67644 r? `@joshtriplett`
…anup, r=compiler-errors A few cleanups Each commit is (mostly) self-explanatory. These changes have come as I try to remove `ReEmpty` (rust-lang#98559).
Add doc comments in `rustc_middle::mir`
Add test for and fix rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131 This lint seems to have been broken by rust-lang#98446 -- but of course, there was no clippy test for this case at the time. `expr.span.ctxt().outer_expn_data()` now has `MacroKind::Derive` instead of `MacroKind::Attr` for something like: ``` #[derive(Clone, Debug)] pub struct UnderscoreInStruct { _foo: u32, } ``` --- changelog: none closes: rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r- |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #98482) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
-Zterminal-widthas--diagnostic-width#95635 (sess: stabilize--terminal-widthas--diagnostic-width)let_chainsblocker #98633 (Fix lastlet_chainsblocker)into_future#98718 (Stabilizeinto_future)rustc_middle::mir#99019 (Add doc comments inrustc_middle::mir)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup