Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PERF ONLY] Revert #97786 #98978

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[PERF ONLY] Revert #97786 #98978

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lqd
Copy link
Member

@lqd lqd commented Jul 6, 2022

Tries to investigate the perf regression in rollup #98656 by reverting #97786.

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 6, 2022
@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Jul 6, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 6, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 6, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 7e81427 with merge b84f273a938608b554ad4ef2c48f9335816fdb79...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 6, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: b84f273a938608b554ad4ef2c48f9335816fdb79 (b84f273a938608b554ad4ef2c48f9335816fdb79)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued b84f273a938608b554ad4ef2c48f9335816fdb79 with parent 5b8cf49, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b84f273a938608b554ad4ef2c48f9335816fdb79): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
1.5% 2.3% 8
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-1.6% -10.4% 123
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-3.1% -10.4% 85
All 😿🎉 (primary) -1.6% -10.4% 123

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
2.2% 3.2% 5
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-1.0% -1.0% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-3.7% -3.7% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) -1.0% -1.0% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.8% 2.8% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
3.0% 3.0% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-3.4% -7.5% 14
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-5.7% -7.9% 24
All 😿🎉 (primary) -3.0% -7.5% 15

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jul 6, 2022
@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Jul 6, 2022

Looks like it was.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants