- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 13.9k
 
[RFC 2011] Optimize non-consuming operators #98337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    
              
                    oli-obk
  
              
              reviewed
              
                  
                    Jun 21, 2022 
                  
              
              
            
            
492364a    to
    a0eba66      
    Compare
  
    | 
           @bors r+  | 
    
| 
           📌 Commit a0eba66 has been approved by   | 
    
| 
           Thank you @oli-obk  | 
    
    
  Dylan-DPC 
      added a commit
        to Dylan-DPC/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 22, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
[RFC 2011] Optimize non-consuming operators Tracking issue: rust-lang#44838 Fifth step of rust-lang#96496 The most non-invasive approach that will probably have very little to no performance impact. ## Current behaviour Captures are handled "on-the-fly", i.e., they are performed in the same place expressions are located. ```rust // `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);` if !( { ***try capture `a` and then return `a`*** } > 1 && { ***try capture `b` and then return `b`*** } < 100 ) { panic!( ... ); } ``` As such, some overhead is likely to occur (Specially with very large chains of conditions). ## New behaviour for non-consuming operators When an operator is known to not take `self`, then it is possible to capture variables **AFTER** the condition. ```rust // `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);` if !( a > 1 && b < 100 ) { { ***try capture `a`*** } { ***try capture `b`*** } panic!( ... ); } ``` So the possible impact on the runtime execution time will be diminished. r? `@oli-obk`
    
  Dylan-DPC 
      added a commit
        to Dylan-DPC/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 24, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
[RFC 2011] Optimize non-consuming operators Tracking issue: rust-lang#44838 Fifth step of rust-lang#96496 The most non-invasive approach that will probably have very little to no performance impact. ## Current behaviour Captures are handled "on-the-fly", i.e., they are performed in the same place expressions are located. ```rust // `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);` if !( { ***try capture `a` and then return `a`*** } > 1 && { ***try capture `b` and then return `b`*** } < 100 ) { panic!( ... ); } ``` As such, some overhead is likely to occur (Specially with very large chains of conditions). ## New behaviour for non-consuming operators When an operator is known to not take `self`, then it is possible to capture variables **AFTER** the condition. ```rust // `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);` if !( a > 1 && b < 100 ) { { ***try capture `a`*** } { ***try capture `b`*** } panic!( ... ); } ``` So the possible impact on the runtime execution time will be diminished. r? ``@oli-obk``
    
  Dylan-DPC 
      added a commit
        to Dylan-DPC/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 28, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
[RFC 2011] Optimize non-consuming operators Tracking issue: rust-lang#44838 Fifth step of rust-lang#96496 The most non-invasive approach that will probably have very little to no performance impact. ## Current behaviour Captures are handled "on-the-fly", i.e., they are performed in the same place expressions are located. ```rust // `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);` if !( { ***try capture `a` and then return `a`*** } > 1 && { ***try capture `b` and then return `b`*** } < 100 ) { panic!( ... ); } ``` As such, some overhead is likely to occur (Specially with very large chains of conditions). ## New behaviour for non-consuming operators When an operator is known to not take `self`, then it is possible to capture variables **AFTER** the condition. ```rust // `let a = 1; let b = 2; assert!(a > 1 && b < 100);` if !( a > 1 && b < 100 ) { { ***try capture `a`*** } { ***try capture `b`*** } panic!( ... ); } ``` So the possible impact on the runtime execution time will be diminished. r? ```@oli-obk```
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 28, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#97346 (Remove a back-compat hack on lazy TAIT) - rust-lang#98261 (Remove `MAX_SUGGESTION_HIGHLIGHT_LINES`) - rust-lang#98337 ([RFC 2011] Optimize non-consuming operators) - rust-lang#98384 (Fix RSS reporting on macOS) - rust-lang#98420 (translation: lint fix + more migration) - rust-lang#98430 (Refactor iter adapters with less macros) - rust-lang#98555 (Hermit: Fix initializing lazy locks) - rust-lang#98595 (Implement `Send` and `Sync` for `ThinBox<T>`) - rust-lang#98597 (Remove unstable CStr/CString change from 1.62 release note) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
      
        
      
      
  
    3 tasks
  
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    F-generic_assert
  `#![feature(generic_assert)]` 
  
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Tracking issue: #44838
Fifth step of #96496
The most non-invasive approach that will probably have very little to no performance impact.
Current behaviour
Captures are handled "on-the-fly", i.e., they are performed in the same place expressions are located.
As such, some overhead is likely to occur (Specially with very large chains of conditions).
New behaviour for non-consuming operators
When an operator is known to not take
self, then it is possible to capture variables AFTER the condition.So the possible impact on the runtime execution time will be diminished.
r? @oli-obk