Rebase LLVM submodule

[nikic]

This is a rebase of our LLVM fork onto LLVM 14.0.5, which is intended to be the last release of the 14.x series. Additionally:

• I've dropped three patches that were needed to build on FreeBSD 11, which is no longer necessary after Update FreeBSD toolchain to 12.3 #97944.
• I've dropped some cherry-picks that were later reverted.
• I've cherry-picked llvm/llvm-project@caa2a82 for Functions referenced by global_asm merged into other functions by LLVM #96797 (fyi @Amanieu)

[rust-highfive]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[rust-highfive]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify submodules.

[nikic]

r? @cuviper

[cuviper]

@tstellar tells me there will be a 14.0.6 this week, so I suppose we should hold for that. Maybe your additional cherry-pick can sneak in there as well?

[nikic]

I don't think I can force-push rust-lang/llvm-project, so I'd probably keep this branch and merge additional commits if needed. I opened llvm/llvm-project#56150 for the upstream cherry-pick though.

[nikic]

Okay, looks like the 14.0.6 release is a very small one (https://discourse.llvm.org/t/llvm-14-0-6-release/63431), that fixes an AVR regression in clang. I've merged the three new commits.

[cuviper]

@bors r+ rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit 6e6b3ea has been approved by cuviper

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6e6b3ea with merge bd2e51a...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cuviper
Pushing bd2e51a to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bd2e51a): comparison url.

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

• Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
• Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	2.8%	2.8%	1
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-2.0%	-2.0%	1
All 😿🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩

2. number of relevant changes ↩