Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #98236

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jyn514 and others added 12 commits June 7, 2022 22:21
This saves a lot of time compiling.
This allows implementing traits that require a raw FD on Arc and Box.

Previously, you'd have to add the function to the trait itself:

```rust
trait MyTrait {
    fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd;
}

impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> {
    fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd {
        (**self).as_raw_fd()
    }
}
```
4 commits in 4d92f07f34ba7fb7d7f207564942508f46c225d3..8d42b0e8794ce3787c9f7d6d88b02ae80ebe8d19
2022-06-10 01:11:04 +0000 to 2022-06-17 16:46:26 +0000
- Use specific terminology for sparse HTTP-based registry (rust-lang/cargo#10764)
- chore: Upgrade to clap 3.2 (rust-lang/cargo#10753)
- Improve testing framework for http registries (rust-lang/cargo#10738)
- doc: Improve example of using the links field (rust-lang/cargo#10728)
 * no-sequences
 * no-throw-literal
`impl<T: AsRawFd> AsRawFd for {Arc,Box}<T>`

This allows implementing traits that require a raw FD on Arc and Box.

Previously, you'd have to add the function to the trait itself:

```rust
trait MyTrait {
    fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd;
}

impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> {
    fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd {
        (**self).as_raw_fd()
    }
}
```

In particular, this leads to lots of "multiple applicable items in scope" errors because you have to disambiguate `MyTrait::as_raw_fd` from `AsRawFd::as_raw_fd` at each call site. In generic contexts, when passing the type to a function that takes `impl AsRawFd` it's also sometimes required to use `T: MyTrait + AsRawFd`, which wouldn't be necessary if I could write `MyTrait: AsRawFd`.

After this PR, the code can be simpler:
```rust
trait MyTrait: AsRawFd {}

impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> {}
```
…imulacrum

Don't build the compiler before building rust-demangler

This saves a lot of time compiling, since rust-demangler doesn't actually use any unstable features.

This is not quite ideal because it uses ToolStd, not ToolBootstrap, so rust-demangler would be able to add unstable library features in the future. But it's a lot better than before, and `builder.cargo` doesn't currently know how to handle stages other than 0.
… r=m-ou-se

once cell renamings

This PR does the renamings proposed in rust-lang#74465 (comment)

- Move/rename `lazy::{OnceCell, Lazy}` to `cell::{OnceCell, LazyCell}`
- Move/rename `lazy::{SyncOnceCell, SyncLazy}` to `sync::{OnceLock, LazyLock}`

(I used `Lazy...` instead of `...Lazy` as it seems to be more consistent, easier to pronounce, etc)

``@rustbot`` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
Update cargo

4 commits in 4d92f07f34ba7fb7d7f207564942508f46c225d3..8d42b0e8794ce3787c9f7d6d88b02ae80ebe8d19
2022-06-10 01:11:04 +0000 to 2022-06-17 16:46:26 +0000
- Use specific terminology for sparse HTTP-based registry (rust-lang/cargo#10764)
- chore: Upgrade to clap 3.2 (rust-lang/cargo#10753)
- Improve testing framework for http registries (rust-lang/cargo#10738)
- doc: Improve example of using the links field (rust-lang/cargo#10728)
…an-DPC

Add new eslint checks

r? ``@Dylan-DPC``
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 18, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 18, 2022

📌 Commit 7b8ce26 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 18, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 7b8ce26 with merge 535546e9ccc184be699e5eec2e1494765814c73a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 18, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 18, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-1 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
test src\thread\mod.rs - thread::spawn (line 606) ... ok

failures:

---- src\os\fd\raw.rs - os::fd::raw::crate::sync::Arc<T> (line 228) stdout ----
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: could not find `unix` in `os`
  |
6 | use std::os::unix::prelude::AsRawFd;
6 | use std::os::unix::prelude::AsRawFd;
  |              ^^^^ could not find `unix` in `os`
error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0433`.
Couldn't compile the test.
---
test result: FAILED. 1074 passed; 1 failed; 20 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 36.15s

error: test failed, to rerun pass '--doc'
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:45:38
make: *** [Makefile:70: ci-subset-1] Error 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants