-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #98236
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #98236
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This saves a lot of time compiling.
This allows implementing traits that require a raw FD on Arc and Box. Previously, you'd have to add the function to the trait itself: ```rust trait MyTrait { fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd; } impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> { fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd { (**self).as_raw_fd() } } ```
4 commits in 4d92f07f34ba7fb7d7f207564942508f46c225d3..8d42b0e8794ce3787c9f7d6d88b02ae80ebe8d19 2022-06-10 01:11:04 +0000 to 2022-06-17 16:46:26 +0000 - Use specific terminology for sparse HTTP-based registry (rust-lang/cargo#10764) - chore: Upgrade to clap 3.2 (rust-lang/cargo#10753) - Improve testing framework for http registries (rust-lang/cargo#10738) - doc: Improve example of using the links field (rust-lang/cargo#10728)
* no-sequences * no-throw-literal
`impl<T: AsRawFd> AsRawFd for {Arc,Box}<T>` This allows implementing traits that require a raw FD on Arc and Box. Previously, you'd have to add the function to the trait itself: ```rust trait MyTrait { fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd; } impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> { fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd { (**self).as_raw_fd() } } ``` In particular, this leads to lots of "multiple applicable items in scope" errors because you have to disambiguate `MyTrait::as_raw_fd` from `AsRawFd::as_raw_fd` at each call site. In generic contexts, when passing the type to a function that takes `impl AsRawFd` it's also sometimes required to use `T: MyTrait + AsRawFd`, which wouldn't be necessary if I could write `MyTrait: AsRawFd`. After this PR, the code can be simpler: ```rust trait MyTrait: AsRawFd {} impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> {} ```
…imulacrum Don't build the compiler before building rust-demangler This saves a lot of time compiling, since rust-demangler doesn't actually use any unstable features. This is not quite ideal because it uses ToolStd, not ToolBootstrap, so rust-demangler would be able to add unstable library features in the future. But it's a lot better than before, and `builder.cargo` doesn't currently know how to handle stages other than 0.
… r=m-ou-se once cell renamings This PR does the renamings proposed in rust-lang#74465 (comment) - Move/rename `lazy::{OnceCell, Lazy}` to `cell::{OnceCell, LazyCell}` - Move/rename `lazy::{SyncOnceCell, SyncLazy}` to `sync::{OnceLock, LazyLock}` (I used `Lazy...` instead of `...Lazy` as it seems to be more consistent, easier to pronounce, etc) ``@rustbot`` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
Update cargo 4 commits in 4d92f07f34ba7fb7d7f207564942508f46c225d3..8d42b0e8794ce3787c9f7d6d88b02ae80ebe8d19 2022-06-10 01:11:04 +0000 to 2022-06-17 16:46:26 +0000 - Use specific terminology for sparse HTTP-based registry (rust-lang/cargo#10764) - chore: Upgrade to clap 3.2 (rust-lang/cargo#10753) - Improve testing framework for http registries (rust-lang/cargo#10738) - doc: Improve example of using the links field (rust-lang/cargo#10728)
…an-DPC Add new eslint checks r? ``@Dylan-DPC``
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jun 18, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit 7b8ce26 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jun 18, 2022
⌛ Testing commit 7b8ce26 with merge 535546e9ccc184be699e5eec2e1494765814c73a... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jun 18, 2022
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
impl<T: AsRawFd> AsRawFd for {Arc,Box}<T>
#97437 (impl<T: AsRawFd> AsRawFd for {Arc,Box}<T>
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup