Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify universal impl trait lowering #97598

Merged

Conversation

spastorino
Copy link
Member

Closes #96644

r? @cjgillot

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 31, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @spastorino! I left a few questions.

/// Treat `impl Trait` as shorthand for a new universal generic parameter.
/// Example: `fn foo(x: impl Debug)`, where `impl Debug` is conceptually
/// equivalent to a fresh universal parameter like `fn foo<T: Debug>(x: T)`.
///
/// Newly generated parameters should be inserted into the given `Vec`.
Universal(&'b mut Vec<hir::GenericParam<'a>>, &'b mut Vec<hir::WherePredicate<'a>>, LocalDefId),
Universal(LocalDefId),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this LocalDefId always equal to self.current_hir_id_owner, or can there be a mismatch?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so but maybe worth checking. Do you think I should check that in this PR? or should we leave this for a followup?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok for follow-up.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I've just checked this and yes, it's always equal. We are always creating Universal passing self.current_hir_id_owner to it.

@@ -290,18 +293,6 @@ enum ImplTraitPosition {
ImplReturn,
}

impl<'a> ImplTraitContext<'_, 'a> {
fn reborrow<'this>(&'this mut self) -> ImplTraitContext<'this, 'a> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉

compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/item.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/item.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the simplify-universal-impl-trait-lowering branch from 793aca9 to 67deaf9 Compare June 1, 2022 18:02
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Jun 1, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 1, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 1, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 15a82d6 with merge 769c5ef1e28f2107770e476529d9aa7305a01e2c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 1, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 769c5ef1e28f2107770e476529d9aa7305a01e2c (769c5ef1e28f2107770e476529d9aa7305a01e2c)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 769c5ef1e28f2107770e476529d9aa7305a01e2c with parent 8256e97, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (769c5ef1e28f2107770e476529d9aa7305a01e2c): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-0.2% -0.2% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
2.5% 2.5% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-3.6% -3.6% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-8.3% -8.3% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) -3.6% -3.6% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.5% 2.5% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-2.6% -2.6% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) 2.5% 2.5% 1

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 1, 2022
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Jun 2, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2022

📌 Commit 15a82d6 has been approved by cjgillot

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 2, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 15a82d6 with merge 42bcd41...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing 42bcd41 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 3, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 42bcd41 into rust-lang:master Jun 3, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 3, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (42bcd41): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
0.6% 0.8% 6
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: mixed results
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.7% 2.7% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
1.1% 1.1% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-2.3% -2.3% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 0.2% 2.7% 2

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.0% 2.0% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 2.0% 2.0% 1

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Simplify universal impl-trait collection during lowering
8 participants