Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove (transitive) reliance on sorting by DefId in pretty-printer #96955

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2022

Conversation

Aaron1011
Copy link
Member

This moves us a step closer to removing the PartialOrd/Ordimpls forDefId`. See #90317

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 11, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 11, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Aaron1011 Aaron1011 force-pushed the pretty-print-sort branch from 39d09c6 to 03f6668 Compare May 11, 2022 23:29
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r=me with the suggestion from #96955 (comment) applied.

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 13, 2022
@pierwill
Copy link
Member

This is great, @Aaron1011! 🙏

This moves us a step closer to removing the `PartialOrd/`Ord` impls
for `DefId`. See rust-lang#90317
@Aaron1011 Aaron1011 force-pushed the pretty-print-sort branch from 03f6668 to 36ccdbe Compare June 22, 2022 17:59
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=petrochenkov

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 22, 2022

📌 Commit 36ccdbe has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 22, 2022

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 22, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
…ochenkov

Remove (transitive) reliance on sorting by DefId in pretty-printer

This moves us a step closer to removing the `PartialOrd/`Ord` impls
for `DefId`. See rust-lang#90317
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91264 (Add macro support in jump to definition feature)
 - rust-lang#96955 (Remove (transitive) reliance on sorting by DefId in pretty-printer)
 - rust-lang#97633 (Session object: Set OS/ABI)
 - rust-lang#98039 (Fix `panic` message for `BTreeSet`'s `range` API and document `panic` cases)
 - rust-lang#98214 (rustc_target: Remove some redundant target properties)
 - rust-lang#98280 (Improve suggestion for calling fn-like expr on type mismatch)
 - rust-lang#98394 (Fixup missing renames from `#[main]` to `#[rustc_main]`)
 - rust-lang#98411 (Update tendril)
 - rust-lang#98419 (Remove excess rib while resolving closures)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2c6feb5 into rust-lang:master Jun 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants