Skip to content

Conversation

@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes #96449, but I haven't yet been able to
make the reproducer work using #[cfg] attributes,
so we can't use the 'revision' infra to write a test

The previous implementation relied on sorting by PlaceRef.
This requires sorting by a DefId, which uses untracked state
(see #93315)

This fixes rust-lang#96449, but I haven't yet been able to
make the reproducer work using `#[cfg]` attributes,
so we can't use the 'revision' infra to write a test

The previous implementation relied on sorting by `PlaceRef`.
This requires sorting by a `DefId`, which uses untracked state
(see rust-lang#93315)
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 10, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 10, 2022
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aaron1011 commented May 10, 2022

See #90317

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 10, 2022

📌 Commit aa0cc9c has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 10, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit aa0cc9c with merge b862b43...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 11, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing b862b43 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 11, 2022
@bors bors merged commit b862b43 into rust-lang:master May 11, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 11, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b862b43): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 1 0 0 0
mean2 N/A 1.2% N/A N/A N/A
max N/A 1.2% N/A N/A N/A

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incremental ICE in exported_symbols query

6 participants