-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert accidental stabilization #94805
Conversation
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @Dylan-DPC |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 5f7ca55 has been approved by |
…askrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94440 (Better error for normalization errors from parent crates that use `#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`) - rust-lang#94587 (Document new recommended use of `FromIterator::from_iter`) - rust-lang#94644 (Fix soundness issue in scoped threads.) - rust-lang#94740 (Unify impl blocks by wrapping them into a div) - rust-lang#94753 (Improve rustdoc book) - rust-lang#94796 (Allow `cargo run` instead of `cargo run -p bootstrap`) - rust-lang#94805 (Revert accidental stabilization) - rust-lang#94809 (RustWrapper: add missing include) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Why did |
Butterfingers on mobile, didn't want to close |
I think it was a weird combination of |
i don't think it needs a re-r+ but just in case @bors r+ |
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
📌 Commit 5f7ca55 has been approved by |
switched team label because (if I am not mistaken) the changes seems more relevant to t-libs, so I thought they should decide on the backport. But in case it can be discussed also tomorrow during T-compiler team |
[beta] backports + bootstrap bump Add pending backports: * Revert accidental stabilization rust-lang#94805 * Do not recover from Ty? in macro parsing rust-lang#94593 * Fix cmake build. rust-lang#95050 And updates the bootstrap compiler to 1.59.0.
fixes #94804