-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #94485
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #94485
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature.
Continuation of rust-lang#94376. cc rust-lang#53667
…olnay Add a `process_group` method to UNIX `CommandExt` - Tracking issue: rust-lang#93857 - RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#3228 Add a `process_group` method to `std::os::unix::process::CommandExt` that allows setting the process group id (i.e. calling `setpgid`) in the child, thus enabling users to set process groups while leveraging the `posix_spawn` fast path.
ARM: Only allow using d16-d31 with asm! when supported by the target Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature. r? `@nagisa`
…henkov Improve allowness of the unexpected_cfgs lint This pull-request improve the allowness (`#[allow(...)]`) of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint. Before this PR only crate level `#![allow(unexpected_cfgs)]` worked, now with this PR it also work when put around `cfg!` or if it is in a upper level. Making it work ~for the attributes `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, ...~ for the same level is awkward as the current code is design to give "Some parent node that is close to this macro call" (cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_expand/base/struct.ExpansionData.html) meaning that allow on the same line as an attribute won't work. I'm note even sure if this would be possible. Found while working on rust-lang#94298. r? `@petrochenkov`
…an-DPC 7 - Make more use of `let_chains` Continuation of rust-lang#94376. cc rust-lang#53667
compiler: fix some typos
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 1, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never |
📌 Commit 77d5946 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Mar 1, 2022
@bors p=5 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
process_group
method to UNIXCommandExt
#93858 (Add aprocess_group
method to UNIXCommandExt
)let_chains
#94476 (7 - Make more use oflet_chains
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup