Inline a few trivial conversion functions

[tmiasko]

No description provided.

[rust-highfive]

r? @nagisa

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[rust-highfive]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify compiler targets. (See the Target Tier Policy.)

[tmiasko]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 8652869c9daa06e306d9f0c169beef1345c7437b with merge efbb34e2a6d22a3aa83b7b108efed88c95141f59...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: efbb34e2a6d22a3aa83b7b108efed88c95141f59 (efbb34e2a6d22a3aa83b7b108efed88c95141f59)

[rust-timer]

Queued efbb34e2a6d22a3aa83b7b108efed88c95141f59 with parent 6421a49, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (efbb34e2a6d22a3aa83b7b108efed88c95141f59): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run shows 44 relevant improvements 🎉 to instruction counts.

• Average relevant improvement: -0.5%
• Largest improvement in instruction counts: -1.0% on full builds of projection-caching check

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

[nagisa]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit ea71420 has been approved by nagisa

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ea71420 with merge 393fdc1...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing 393fdc1 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (393fdc1): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 103 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression