Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: correct soft-foat #93814

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2022

Conversation

Grommish
Copy link
Contributor

@Grommish Grommish commented Feb 9, 2022

MIPS64 targets under OpenWrt require soft-float fpu support.

Rust-lang requires soft-float defined in tuple definition and
isn't over-ridden by toolchain compile-time CFLAGS/LDFLAGS

Set explicit soft-float for tuple.

Signed-off-by: Donald Hoskins [email protected]

MIPS64 targets under OpenWrt require soft-float fpu support.

Rust-lang requires soft-float defined in tuple definition and
isn't over-ridden by toolchain compile-time CFLAGS/LDFLAGS

Set explicit soft-float for tuple.

Signed-off-by: Donald Hoskins <[email protected]>
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 9, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @wesleywiser

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 9, 2022
@Grommish
Copy link
Contributor Author

Grommish commented Feb 9, 2022

I will probably need to push another change that I'm testing now.

@Grommish
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok.. I think this is all the changes I need at this point.

@wesleywiser - Thank you for your patience!

Copy link
Member

@bjorn3 bjorn3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but given that I suggested this change I will defer to @wesleywiser to approve this PR.

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented Feb 17, 2022

Looks like none of the mips64 targets supported by openwrt have an fpu and thus all of them use soft-float: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/search?q=mips64+fpu+path%3Atarget

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2022

📌 Commit bfd16ab has been approved by bjorn3

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89892 (Suggest `impl Trait` return type when incorrectly using a generic return type)
 - rust-lang#91675 (Add MemTagSanitizer Support)
 - rust-lang#92806 (Add more information to `impl Trait` error)
 - rust-lang#93497 (Pass `--test` flag through rustdoc to rustc so `#[test]` functions can be scraped)
 - rust-lang#93814 (mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: correct soft-foat)
 - rust-lang#93847 (kmc-solid: Use the filesystem thread-safety wrapper)
 - rust-lang#93877 (asm: Allow the use of r8-r14 as clobbers on Thumb1)
 - rust-lang#93892 (Only mark projection as ambiguous if GAT substs are constrained)
 - rust-lang#93915 (Implement --check-cfg option (RFC 3013), take 2)
 - rust-lang#93953 (Add the `known-bug` test directive, use it, and do some cleanup)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 32c8acd into rust-lang:master Feb 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants