Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change ResultShunt to be generic over Try #93572

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2022

Conversation

scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@scottmcm scottmcm commented Feb 2, 2022

Just a refactor (and rename) for now, so it's not Result-specific.

This could be used for a future Iterator::try_collect, or similar, but anything like that is left for a future PR.

@scottmcm scottmcm added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 2, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @yaahc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2022
Copy link
Member

@yaahc yaahc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very fun. I'm pretty much ready to approve, just a couple minor comments.

library/core/src/iter/traits/accum.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
library/core/src/iter/adapters/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
library/core/src/iter/adapters/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@yaahc
Copy link
Member

yaahc commented Feb 4, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 4, 2022

📌 Commit 399893d has been approved by yaahc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 4, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2022
Change `ResultShunt` to be generic over `Try`

Just a refactor (and rename) for now, so it's not `Result`-specific.

This could be used for a future `Iterator::try_collect`, or similar, but anything like that is left for a future PR.
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Failed in a rollup: #93702 (comment)
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 6, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Feb 6, 2022

Fixes for the 2021 stuff are now in #93719 -- I'll rebase this onto that later.

@scottmcm scottmcm added S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 6, 2022
Just a refactor (and rename) for now, so it's not `Result`-specific.

This could be used for a future `Iterator::try_collect`, or similar, but anything like that is left for a future PR.
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Feb 7, 2022

@bors r=yaahc

No new code changes; just rebased onto master now that my other PR landed.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2022

📌 Commit 413945e has been approved by yaahc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Feb 7, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Feb 7, 2022

@bors rollup=iffy (failed in rollup last time, so there might still be something I missed)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 8, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 413945e with merge 0c292c9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 8, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: yaahc
Pushing 0c292c9 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 8, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 0c292c9 into rust-lang:master Feb 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 8, 2022
@scottmcm scottmcm deleted the generic-iter-process branch February 8, 2022 17:55
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0c292c9): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 6 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
Let `try_collect` take advantage of `try_fold` overrides

No public API changes.

With this change, `try_collect` (rust-lang#94047) is no longer going through the `impl Iterator for &mut impl Iterator`, and thus will be able to use `try_fold` overrides instead of being forced through `next` for every element.

Here's the test added, to see that it fails before this PR (once a new enough nightly is out): https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=462f2896f2fed2c238ee63ca1a7e7c56

This might as well go to the same person as my last `try_process` PR  (rust-lang#93572), so
r? `@yaahc`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
Let `try_collect` take advantage of `try_fold` overrides

No public API changes.

With this change, `try_collect` (rust-lang#94047) is no longer going through the `impl Iterator for &mut impl Iterator`, and thus will be able to use `try_fold` overrides instead of being forced through `next` for every element.

Here's the test added, to see that it fails before this PR (once a new enough nightly is out): https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=462f2896f2fed2c238ee63ca1a7e7c56

This might as well go to the same person as my last `try_process` PR  (rust-lang#93572), so
r? ``@yaahc``
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants