Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[perf only] Test SimplifyCFG patch #93027

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nikic
Copy link
Contributor

@nikic nikic commented Jan 18, 2022

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor Author

nikic commented Jan 18, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 7411334 with merge 4855d02ff6d02b33d0cd181f5e574ad17c2e6284...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 4855d02ff6d02b33d0cd181f5e574ad17c2e6284 (4855d02ff6d02b33d0cd181f5e574ad17c2e6284)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 4855d02ff6d02b33d0cd181f5e574ad17c2e6284 with parent e4ff903, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4855d02ff6d02b33d0cd181f5e574ad17c2e6284): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jan 18, 2022
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor Author

nikic commented Jan 18, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 13481be with merge 536b3684039689d2e0649d093ad6d4e15479d6fa...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #87648) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 536b3684039689d2e0649d093ad6d4e15479d6fa (536b3684039689d2e0649d093ad6d4e15479d6fa)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 536b3684039689d2e0649d093ad6d4e15479d6fa with parent 7531d2f, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (536b3684039689d2e0649d093ad6d4e15479d6fa): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 18, 2022
@nikic nikic closed this Jan 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants