-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 7 pull requests #92031
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #92031
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think it's helpful to know what type was unused when looking at these warnings. The type will likely determine whether the result *should* be used, or whether it should just be ignored. Including the type also matches the behavior of the `must_use` lint: unused `SomeType` that must be used.
This reverts commit 3281022.
See rust-lang#91867 for more information.
Given ```rust match Some(42) {} ``` suggest ```rust match Some(42) { None | Some(_) => todo!(), } ```
…st it Given ```rust match Some(42) { Some(0) => {} } ``` suggest ```rust match Some(42) { Some(0) => {} None | Some(_) => todo!(), } ```
…est it Given ```rust match Some(42) { Some(0) => {} Some(1) => {} } ``` suggest ```rust match Some(42) { Some(0) => {} Some(1) => {} None | Some(_) => todo!(), } ```
… `span_label` This makes the order of the output always consistent: 1. Place of the `match` missing arms 2. The `enum` definition span 3. The structured suggestion to add a fallthrough arm
Apply path remapping to DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name when producing split DWARF `--remap-path-prefix` doesn't apply to paths to `.o` (in case of packed) or `.dwo` (in case of unpacked) files in `DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name`. GCC also has this bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91888
Show the unused type for `unused_results` lint I think it's helpful to know what type was unused when looking at these warnings. The type will likely determine whether the result *should* be used, or whether it should just be ignored. Including the type also matches the behavior of the `must_use` lint: unused `SomeType` that must be used.
Remove `in_band_lifetimes` for `rustc_passes` rust-lang#91867
miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct Fixes rust-lang#91827. r? ``@RalfJung``
…mpl, r=michaelwoerister Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_query_impl` See rust-lang#91867 for more information.
…li-obk Tweak output for non-exhaustive `match` expression * Provide structured suggestion when missing `match` arms * Move pointing at the missing variants *after* the main error <img width="1164" alt="" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1606434/146312085-b57ef4a3-6e96-4f32-aa2a-803637d9eeba.png">
…sing, r=Amanieu builtin_macros: allow external consumers for AsmArgs parsing As discussed in Zulip (https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/parsing.20of.20AsmArgs.20for.20inline.20assembly), we need a function entry point that rustfmt can leverage from a pre-expansion context to get a more structured representation of the asm args without having to duplicate/maintain the token stream parsing r? `@Amanieu` and/or `@joshtriplett`
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Dec 17, 2021
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
📌 Commit 3358fb4 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Dec 17, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 3358fb4 with merge da34d8956b3c014bc48a33211b157190c6ddfad4... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Dec 17, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #89841) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
unused_results
lint #91818 (Show the unused type forunused_results
lint)in_band_lifetimes
forrustc_passes
#91896 (Removein_band_lifetimes
forrustc_passes
)in_band_lifetimes
fromrustc_query_impl
#91923 (Removein_band_lifetimes
fromrustc_query_impl
)match
expression #91993 (Tweak output for non-exhaustivematch
expression)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup