Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expand: Turn ast::Crate into a first class expansion target #91313

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2021

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

And stop creating a fake mod item for the crate root when expanding a crate, thus addressing FIXMEs left in #82238, and making a step towards a proper support for crate-level macro attributes (cc #54726).

I haven't added token collection support for the whole crate in this PR, maybe later.
r? @Aaron1011

And stop creating a fake `mod` item for the crate root when expanding a crate.
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 28, 2021
let mut fold_crate = |krate: ast::Crate| {
let mut krate = match self.configure(krate) {
Some(krate) => krate,
None => return empty_crate(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can the entire crate really be removed with something like #![cfg(FALSE)]? Is there a test case for this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, libcore has #![cfg(not(test))] in its root in particular.
There are some tests for this as well, e.g. src\test\ui\issues\issue-34932.rs and src\test\ui\conditional-compilation\cfg-in-crate-1.rs.

@Aaron1011
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 1, 2021

📌 Commit 141c6cc has been approved by Aaron1011

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 1, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#88502 (Add slice take methods)
 - rust-lang#91313 (expand: Turn `ast::Crate` into a first class expansion target)
 - rust-lang#91424 (Update LLVM with patches for better llvm-cov diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#91425 (Include lint errors in error count for `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`)
 - rust-lang#91430 (Add tests for `normalize-docs` overflow errors)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 1, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 519a842 into rust-lang:master Dec 1, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 1, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2021
ast: Avoid aborts on fatal errors thrown from mutable AST visitor

Set the node to some dummy value and rethrow the error instead.

When using the old aborting `visit_clobber` in `InvocationCollector::visit_crate` the next tests abort due to fatal errors:
```
ui\modules\path-invalid-form.rs
ui\modules\path-macro.rs
ui\modules\path-no-file-name.rs
ui\parser\issues\issue-5806.rs
ui\parser\mod_file_with_path_attr.rs
```

Follow up to rust-lang#91313.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
ast: Always keep a `NodeId` in `ast::Crate`

This makes it more uniform with other expanded nodes.
It makes generic code in rust-lang#92573 simpler in particular.

This is another follow-up to rust-lang#91313.
r? `@Aaron1011`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants