Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a chapter on the test harness. #82350

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2021
Merged

Add a chapter on the test harness. #82350

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2021

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Feb 20, 2021

There isn't really any online documentation on the test harness, so this adds a chapter to the rustc book which provides information on how the harness works and details on the command-line options.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 20, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

"Write logs to the specified file instead \
of stdout",
"Write logs to the specified file",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this change made?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is incorrect. Normal output continues to go to stdout with --logfile. I discovered some of the help text was incorrect while writing the chapter.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Normal output continues to go to stdout with --logfile.

What is "normal output"? Do you meant that with --logfile logs still go to stdout, but they also go to the log file?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Normal output is the output the harness normally displays, such as:

 test it_works ... ok 

With --logfile, it writes a specific format to the given file, which looks like:

ok it_works

I was reluctant to document the specific format, since I don't know if it is intended to be stable or relied upon. It was added without much detail in #2127, and I'm not sure anyone actually uses it (I haven't seen it used before).

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. If an english-native could double-check for the spelling, it'd be great.

cc @rust-lang/docs

@theotherphil
Copy link
Contributor

theotherphil commented Feb 21, 2021

Looks good to me. If an english-native could double-check for the spelling, it'd be great.

I’ve flagged a couple of typos but otherwise the spelling and grammar looks fine.

src/doc/rustc/src/tests/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +33 to +35
* Enables building of functions annotated with the [`test`][attribute-test]
and [`bench`](#benchmarks) attributes, which will be run by the test
harness.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh huh, TIL that #[test] functions are omitted even with --cfg test if you don't pass --test.

$ cat src/main.rs
#[test]
pub fn it_works() {
}
$ cargo rustc -q -- --cfg test
$ nm /home/joshua/src/rust/test-rustdoc/hello-world/target/debug/hello-world | grep works | wc -l
0

src/doc/rustc/src/tests/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jyn514 jyn514 added A-libtest Area: `#[test]` / the `test` library S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 22, 2021
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor Author

ehuss commented Feb 22, 2021

Pushed an update, thanks @GuillaumeGomez, @theotherphil, and @jyn514 for taking a look!

@jyn514 jyn514 added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 22, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Feb 27, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 27, 2021

📌 Commit 7d99d6d has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 27, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 7d99d6d with merge 247337f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jyn514
Pushing 247337f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 28, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 247337f into rust-lang:master Feb 28, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Feb 28, 2021
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
epage added a commit to epage/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`.
The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a
limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at
the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such
mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in
libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with
programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated
but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering
requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect
any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to
new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to
apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are
instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the
compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would
put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include
`--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways
(rust-lang@5cc050b,
rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended
feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)).
Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated.
By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html),
this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
fix(libtest): Deprecate '--logfile'

rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`. The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include `--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways (rust-lang@5cc050b, rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)). Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated. By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses (rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html), this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.

Closes rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2025
fix(libtest): Deprecate '--logfile'

rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`. The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include `--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways (rust-lang@5cc050b, rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)). Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated. By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses (rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html), this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.

Closes rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2025
fix(libtest): Deprecate '--logfile'

rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`. The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include `--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways (rust-lang@5cc050b, rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)). Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated. By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses (rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html), this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.

Closes rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134283 - epage:logfile, r=Amanieu

fix(libtest): Deprecate '--logfile'

rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 proposed changing the behavior of `--logfile`. The given reasons were:

(1) Bazel can't programmatically process stdout.  This seems like a limitation in Bazel and we recommend focusing on that.  If we look at the wider Rust ecosystem, Rustc and Cargo don't support any such mechanism and the Cargo team rejected having one.  Expecting this in libtest when its not supported elsewhere seems too specialized.

(2) Tests that leak out non-programmatic output that intermixes with programmatic output.  We acknowledge this is a problem to be evaluated but we need to make sure we are stepping back and gathering requirements, rather than assuming `--logfile` will fit the needs.

Independent of the motive, regarding using or changing  `--logfile`

(1) Most ways to do it would be a breaking change, like if we respect any stable `--format`.  As suggested above, we could specialize this to new `--format` values but that would be confusing for some values to apply but not others.

(2) Other ways of solving this add new features to lib`test` when we are instead wanting to limit the feature set it has to minimize the compatibility surface that has to be maintained and the burden it would put on third party harnesses which are a focus area.  Examples include `--format compact` or a `--log-format` flag

(3) The existence of `--logfile` dates back quite a ways (rust-lang@5cc050b, rust-lang#2127) and the history gives the
impression this more of slipped through rather than being an intended feature (see also
rust-lang#82350 (comment)). Deprecation would better match to how it has been treated. By deprecating this, we do not expect custom test harnesses (rust-lang/testing-devex-team#2) to implement this.

T-testing-devex held an FCP for deprecating in rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9 though according to
[RFC rust-lang#3455](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3455-t-test.html), this is still subject to final approval from T-libs-api.

Closes rust-lang/testing-devex-team#9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools A-libtest Area: `#[test]` / the `test` library merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants