Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #80867

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jan 10, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #80867

merged 23 commits into from
Jan 10, 2021

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Julian Wollersberger and others added 23 commits November 28, 2020 13:35
The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
On structured suggestion for `let` -> `const`  and `const` -> `let`, use
a proper `Span` and update tests to check the correct application.

Follow up to rust-lang#80012.
It was only used once, in a function that was otherwise trivial.
In particular, the CI built `libLLVM-*.so` needs to have `libz.so`
RPATHed so that binaries like `llvm-config` work at all.
This makes it possible to have both std::panic and core::panic as a
builtin macro, by using different builtin macro names for each.

Also removes SyntaxExtension::is_derive_copy, as the macro name (e.g.
sym::Copy) is now tracked and provides that information directly.
This used to be necessary for `is_builtin` in the past, but is no longer required.

Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <[email protected]>
Hopefully this will prevent people from continuing to ask about this
over and over again :)

See [this Zulip discussion][1] for more.

[1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Vec.3A.3Atruncate.20implementation
…u64, r=withoutboats

Implement From<char> for u64 and u128.

With this PR you can write
```
let u = u64::from('👤');
let u = u128::from('👤');
```

Previously, you could already write `as` conversions ([Playground link](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=cee18febe28e69024357d099f07ca081)):
```
// Lossless conversions
dbg!('👤' as u32);    // Prints 128100
dbg!('👤' as u64);    // Prints 128100
dbg!('👤' as u128);   // Prints 128100

// truncates, thus no `From` impls.
dbg!('👤' as u8);     // Prints 100
dbg!('👤' as u16);    // Prints 62564

// These `From` impls already exist.
dbg!(u32::from('👤'));               // Prints 128100
dbg!(u64::from(u32::from('👤')));    // Prints 128100
```

The idea is from ``@gendx`` who opened [this Internals thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/implement-from-char-for-u64/13454), and ``@withoutboats`` responded that someone should open a PR for it.
Some people mentioned `From<char>` impls for `f32` and `f64`, but that doesn't seem correct to me, so I didn't include them here.

I don't know what the feature should be named. Must it be registered somewhere, like unstable features?

r? ``@withoutboats``
…r=matthewjasper

Improve core::ptr::drop_in_place debuginfo

* Use span of the dropped type as function span when possible.
* Rename symbol from `core::ptr::drop_in_place::$hash` to `{{drop}}::<$TYPE>::$hash`.

Fixes rust-lang#77465

(I haven't yet updated the tests)
Fix safety comment

The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
… r=petrochenkov

Use correct span for structured suggestion

On structured suggestion for `let` -> `const`  and `const` -> `let`, use
a proper `Span` and update tests to check the correct application.

Follow up to rust-lang#80012.
…Gomez

Remove useless `fill_in` function

It was only used once, in a function that was otherwise trivial.
…ulacrum

Support `download-ci-llvm` on NixOS

In particular, the CI built `libLLVM-*.so` needs to have `libz.so`
RPATHed so that binaries like `llvm-config` work at all.
…repetita, r=jyn514

Remove under-used ImplPolarity enum

It doesn't make much sense to have an enum with only two possible values and to store it inside an `Option` in my opinion when you can do all the same with a simple boolean. I don't expect any chances, performance or RSS usage wise.

r? ``@jyn514``
…=petrochenkov

Allow #[rustc_builtin_macro = "name"]

This adds the option of specifying the name of a builtin macro in the `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` attribute: `#[rustc_builtin_macro = "name"]`.

This makes it possible to have both `std::panic!` and `core::panic!` as a builtin macro, by using different builtin macro names for each. This is needed to implement the edition-specific behaviour of the panic macros of RFC 3007.

Also removes `SyntaxExtension::is_derive_copy`, as the macro name (e.g. `sym::Copy`) is now tracked and provides that information directly.

r? ``@petrochenkov``
…ttmcm

Add comment to `Vec::truncate` explaining `>` vs `>=`

Hopefully this will prevent people from continuing to ask about this
over and over again :)

See [this Zulip discussion][1] for more.

[1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Vec.3A.3Atruncate.20implementation

r? ``@scottmcm``
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jan 10, 2021
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=9 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 10, 2021

📌 Commit 19b8c65 has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 10, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 10, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 19b8c65 with merge 34628e5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 10, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing 34628e5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.