Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tests of "unused_lifetimes" lint for async functions and corresponding source code #79689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2021

Conversation

Vooblin
Copy link
Contributor

@Vooblin Vooblin commented Dec 4, 2020

Before this PR the following code would cause an error:

#![deny(unused_lifetimes)]
async fn f<'a>(_: &'a i32) {}
fn main() {}

It was happening because of the desugaring of return type in async functions. As a result of the desugaring, the return type contains all lifetimes involved in the function signature. And these lifetimes were interpreted separately from the same in the function scope => so they are unused.

Now, all lifetimes from the return type are interpreted as used. It is also not perfect, but at least this lint doesn't cause wrong errors now.

This PR connected to issues #78522, #77217

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @matthewjasper (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 4, 2020
@Vooblin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Vooblin commented Dec 14, 2020

r? @tmandry

@tmandry
Copy link
Member

tmandry commented Jan 14, 2021

Thanks for the fix!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2021

📌 Commit 64f11b9 has been approved by tmandry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 14, 2021
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021
Update tests of "unused_lifetimes" lint for async functions and corresponding source code

Before this PR the following code would cause an error:
```
#![deny(unused_lifetimes)]
async fn f<'a>(_: &'a i32) {}
fn main() {}
```
It was happening because of the desugaring of return type in async functions. As a result of the desugaring, the return type contains all lifetimes involved in the function signature. And these lifetimes were interpreted separately from the same in the function scope => so they are unused.

Now, all lifetimes from the return type are interpreted as used. It is also not perfect, but at least this lint doesn't cause wrong errors now.

This PR connected to issues rust-lang#78522, rust-lang#77217
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021
Update tests of "unused_lifetimes" lint for async functions and corresponding source code

Before this PR the following code would cause an error:
```
#![deny(unused_lifetimes)]
async fn f<'a>(_: &'a i32) {}
fn main() {}
```
It was happening because of the desugaring of return type in async functions. As a result of the desugaring, the return type contains all lifetimes involved in the function signature. And these lifetimes were interpreted separately from the same in the function scope => so they are unused.

Now, all lifetimes from the return type are interpreted as used. It is also not perfect, but at least this lint doesn't cause wrong errors now.

This PR connected to issues rust-lang#78522, rust-lang#77217
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 64f11b9 with merge 4275ef6...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: tmandry
Pushing 4275ef6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 14, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 4275ef6 into rust-lang:master Jan 14, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Jan 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants