Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miri: port error backtraces to std::backtrace #71712

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2020

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

No need to pull in an external dependency if libstd already includes this feature (using the same dependency internally, but... still).

r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 30, 2020
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

I checked in the code that std::backtrace lazily resolves symbols, but let's still make sure that this does not make anything slower.

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 30, 2020

⌛ Trying commit 30b32c6 with merge f1ecbbb3d28b7ebfb433e60f9a78a39ec8a6380a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 30, 2020

☀️ Try build successful - checks-azure
Build commit: f1ecbbb3d28b7ebfb433e60f9a78a39ec8a6380a (f1ecbbb3d28b7ebfb433e60f9a78a39ec8a6380a)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued f1ecbbb3d28b7ebfb433e60f9a78a39ec8a6380a with parent eece58a, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit f1ecbbb3d28b7ebfb433e60f9a78a39ec8a6380a, comparison URL.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented May 1, 2020

Well, I'd say there is no measurable difference.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented May 1, 2020

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 1, 2020

📌 Commit 30b32c6 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 1, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2020
Miri: port error backtraces to std::backtrace

No need to pull in an external dependency if libstd already includes this feature (using the same dependency internally, but... still).

r? @oli-obk
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2020
Miri: port error backtraces to std::backtrace

No need to pull in an external dependency if libstd already includes this feature (using the same dependency internally, but... still).

r? @oli-obk
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2020
Miri: port error backtraces to std::backtrace

No need to pull in an external dependency if libstd already includes this feature (using the same dependency internally, but... still).

r? @oli-obk
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#71712 (Miri: port error backtraces to std::backtrace)
 - rust-lang#71736 (bootstrap: also apply unused-attributes hack without deny_warnings)
 - rust-lang#71738 (remove AllocId generalization of Pointer)
 - rust-lang#71739 (remove obsolete comment)
 - rust-lang#71781 (Uncomment test code for failure to use `Box::pin`)
 - rust-lang#71782 (Use a non-existent test path instead of clobbering /dev/null)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit cd824a5 into rust-lang:master May 2, 2020
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the error-backtrace branch May 3, 2020 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants