Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix invalid suggestion on &mut iterators yielding & references #70264

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2020

Conversation

tirr-c
Copy link
Contributor

@tirr-c tirr-c commented Mar 22, 2020

Fixes #69789.

rustc suggested an invalid code when & reference from &mut iterator is mutated. The compiler knew we're mutating a value behind & reference, but as the assignment RHS is from desugaring, it could only see the iterator expression from source and inserted mut there.

r? @estebank

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 22, 2020
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 23, 2020

📌 Commit 1e5d81d has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 23, 2020
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2020
…r=estebank

Fix invalid suggestion on `&mut` iterators yielding `&` references

Fixes rust-lang#69789.

rustc suggested an invalid code when `&` reference from `&mut` iterator is mutated. The compiler knew we're mutating a value behind `&` reference, but as the assignment RHS is from desugaring, it could only see the iterator expression from source and inserted `mut` there.

r? @estebank
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2020
…r=estebank

Fix invalid suggestion on `&mut` iterators yielding `&` references

Fixes rust-lang#69789.

rustc suggested an invalid code when `&` reference from `&mut` iterator is mutated. The compiler knew we're mutating a value behind `&` reference, but as the assignment RHS is from desugaring, it could only see the iterator expression from source and inserted `mut` there.

r? @estebank
This was referenced Mar 23, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#67761 (Move the dep_graph construction to a dedicated crate.)
 - rust-lang#69740 (Replace some desc logic in librustc_lint with article_and_desc)
 - rust-lang#69981 (Evaluate repeat expression lengths as late as possible)
 - rust-lang#70087 (Remove const eval loop detector)
 - rust-lang#70242 (Improve E0308 error message wording)
 - rust-lang#70264 (Fix invalid suggestion on `&mut` iterators yielding `&` references)
 - rust-lang#70267 (get rid of ConstPropUnsupported; use ZST marker structs instead)
 - rust-lang#70277 (Remove `ReClosureBound`)
 - rust-lang#70283 (Add regression test for rust-lang#70155.)
 - rust-lang#70294 (Account for bad placeholder types in where clauses)
 - rust-lang#70309 (Clean up E0452 explanation)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit ab2817b into rust-lang:master Mar 24, 2020
@tirr-c tirr-c deleted the issue-69789-mut-suggestion branch March 24, 2020 04:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

compiler suggests "&mut mut"
4 participants