rustc_mir: use nicer path printing for #[rustc_regions] NLL tests. #66911
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 84bad09 has been approved by |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
RalfJung
added a commit
to RalfJung/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2019
…wjasper rustc_mir: use nicer path printing for #[rustc_regions] NLL tests. Similar to rust-lang#66850, spotted while working on rust-lang#66907. r? @matthewjasper
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2019
rustc_mir: use nicer path printing for #[rustc_regions] NLL tests. Similar to #66850, spotted while working on #66907. r? @matthewjasper
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to #66850, spotted while working on #66907.
r? @matthewjasper