-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Internal lints #58701
[WIP] Internal lints #58701
Conversation
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
You can probably add the flag in Line 849 in c1911ba
mode variable.
|
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
@@ -1410,6 +1410,9 @@ options! {DebuggingOptions, DebuggingSetter, basic_debugging_options, | |||
merge_functions: Option<MergeFunctions> = (None, parse_merge_functions, [TRACKED], | |||
"control the operation of the MergeFunctions LLVM pass, taking | |||
the same values as the target option of the same name"), | |||
internal_lints: bool = (false, parse_bool, [UNTRACKED], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of adding a new flag we could just reuse the -Zunstable-features flag. If the lints are allow by default, we can add deny attributes to crates in steps, and even with cfg_attr to only turn them on after stage0. That will get us around having to touch bootstrap
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I think that is way easier. I'll try that ASAP.
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #58250) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
ping from triage @flip1995 you need to resolve the conflicts |
Oh sorry, I'll get to this tomorrow, but I have to redo this and I will open a new PR |
…li-obk Internal lints take 2 cc rust-lang#58701 cc rust-lang#49509 TODO: Add `#![warn(internal)]` to crates (and fix violations) Crates depending on `rustc_data_structures` - [x] librustc_resolve - [x] librustc_driver - [x] librustc_passes - [x] librustc_metadata - [x] librustc_interface - [x] librustc_save_analysis - [x] librustc_lint - [x] librustc - [x] librustc_incremental - [x] librustc_codegen_utils - [x] libarena - [x] librustc_target - [x] librustc_allocator - [x] librustc_privacy - [x] librustc_traits - [x] librustc_borrowck - [x] libsyntax - [x] librustc_codegen_ssa - [x] libsyntax_ext - [x] librustc_errors - [x] librustc_mir - [x] libsyntax_pos - [x] librustc_typeck Crates with `feature(rustc_private)` Excluding crates, which are already in the list above. Also excluding tools and tests. - [ ] ~~libstd~~ - [x] libfmt_macros - [x] librustdoc r? @oli-obk
…li-obk Internal lints take 2 cc rust-lang#58701 cc rust-lang#49509 TODO: Add `#![warn(internal)]` to crates (and fix violations) Crates depending on `rustc_data_structures` - [x] librustc_resolve - [x] librustc_driver - [x] librustc_passes - [x] librustc_metadata - [x] librustc_interface - [x] librustc_save_analysis - [x] librustc_lint - [x] librustc - [x] librustc_incremental - [x] librustc_codegen_utils - [x] libarena - [x] librustc_target - [x] librustc_allocator - [x] librustc_privacy - [x] librustc_traits - [x] librustc_borrowck - [x] libsyntax - [x] librustc_codegen_ssa - [x] libsyntax_ext - [x] librustc_errors - [x] librustc_mir - [x] libsyntax_pos - [x] librustc_typeck Crates with `feature(rustc_private)` Excluding crates, which are already in the list above. Also excluding tools and tests. - [ ] ~~libstd~~ - [x] libfmt_macros - [x] librustdoc r? @oli-obk
cc #49509
I just implemented rust-lang/rust-clippy#3787 and wanted to replace the manual
filter*()
calls with the new iterators. Then I remembered that I still had this in the pipeline.I will need some help how to add the
-Z internal_lints
flag to the bootstrap script. Especially if it is possible to enable the flag for all subcrates butlibstd
(and maybe some other subcrates).r? @oli-obk