App-lint-cability #52968
Merged
App-lint-cability #52968
+57
−19
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Andrew Chin recently pointed out (rust-lang/cargo#5846) that it's surprising that `cargo fix` (now shipping with Cargo itself!) doesn't fix very common lint warnings, which is as good of a reminder as any that we should finish rust-lang#50723.
zackmdavis
force-pushed
the
app-lint-cability
branch
from
581bde7 to
6e63b0d
Compare
|
Thank you! I'd really like to see rustfix tests for this, though :) |
|
@killercup My understanding is that there's nothing to test (in this repo), because rustc's compiletest isn't filtering by machine-applicability, as borne out by the existence of run-rustfix tests that succeed despite the relevant diagnostic being marked MaybeIncorrect. |
|
@zackmdavis oh, right, we should really upgrade these tests to use a newer rustfix and enable filtering! |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 6e63b0d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2018
…ebank App-lint-cability @eminence recently pointed out (rust-lang/cargo#5846) that it's surprising that `cargo fix` (now shipping with Cargo itself!) doesn't fix very common lint warnings, which is as good of a reminder as any that we should finish rust-lang#50723. (Previously, we did this on the librustc and libsyntax crates in rust-lang#50724. I filed rust-lang/this-week-in-rust#685 in hopes of recruiting new contributors to do the rest.) r? @estebank
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2018
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #51919 (Provide `{to,from}_{ne,le,be}_bytes` functions on integers) - #52940 (Align 6-week cycle check with beta promotion instead of stable release.) - #52968 (App-lint-cability) - #52969 (rustbuild: fix local_rebuild) - #52995 (Remove unnecessary local in await! generator) - #52996 (RELEASES.md: fix the `hash_map::Entry::or_default` link) - #53001 (privacy: Fix an ICE in `path_is_private_type`) - #53003 (Stabilize --color and --error-format options in rustdoc) - #53022 (volatile operations docs: clarify that this does not help wrt. concurrency) - #53024 (Specify reentrancy gurantees of `Once::call_once`) - #53041 (Fix invalid code css rule) - #53047 (Make entire row of doc search results clickable) - #53050 (Make left column of rustdoc search results narrower) - #53062 (Remove redundant field names in structs)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@eminence recently pointed out (rust-lang/cargo#5846) that it's
surprising that
cargo fix(now shipping with Cargo itself!) doesn'tfix very common lint warnings, which is as good of a reminder as any
that we should finish #50723.
(Previously, we did this on the librustc and libsyntax crates in #50724. I filed rust-lang/this-week-in-rust#685 in hopes of recruiting new contributors to do the rest.)
r? @estebank